Islam - A Terrifying Monster Unchained in Our Time

Time for Action . . . NOW !

2009-03-18T03:52:00.000-07:00

The articles in this blog have been, so far, merely commentaries on the evils and barbarianism of Islam. Now, however, we are going to move farther toward the edge of the abyss into which Islam and the Mohammedans are attempting to force the rest of the world.

When the United Nations Human Rights Council dominated by thirty of the most barbaric countries on the face of the earth, held its ninth Special Session on January 9th, 2009 condemning the Israeli defensive action against the eight year rocket campaign launched by Arabs in Gaza specifically targeting Israeli civilian centers, the vote of 33 nations in favor, 1 against and 13 abstentions set off screaming alarm signals in the civilized world. When the resolution was passed, not one word referred to continuing Arab attacks against civilians, the on-going support by fanatical Islamic countries for terrorist activities both against Israel and across the globe, or any other of the violent and oppressive manesfestations of Islam.

Now, the dominent Islamic bloc in the U.N. is working on a resolution that would "criminalize" ( please remember that wording and let it be seared into your mind) any criticism of Islam anywhere in the world and establish harsh penalties for any such criticism. This resolution does not, of course, extend that prohibition to Islam's "right" to criticise and blaspheme other religions. This is strictly a one-way street.

The resolution passed by the 9th session of the U.N. Human Rights Council and this impending attempt to extend Islam's domination across the face of the earth parallel exactly the first steps taken by the German National Socialists Workers Party in their meteoric rise to power between the years 1933 and 1936.

In 1933, many Germans and, indeed, other Europeans with clear political and historical foresight, had the good sense to leave Germany and find early refuge abroad. Others stayed behind and organized resistance movements whose early efforts materially aided the Allies by disrupting and impeding the Germans' efforts to dominate the countries they overran with their Biltzkreig war.

Unfortunately, today, Islam is a global network from which there is no safe haven. No country on the face of the earth is proof against the terror of the Mohammedan. No village, no town, no city, state or nation is safe.

Therefore, logic ( and common sense ) dictates that if you cannot run, then you take your stand and resist to the best of your capabilities. Now is the time for all individuals who value liberty, human rights and their lives and the lives of their children to take direct and effective action to stem this tide of Islamic fascism.

Now is the time for organizing and establishing communication among religious, political and social groups who can aid one another in combating this new threat to liberty, democracy and the stableizing influence of social pluralism. We have to learn from the mistakes of the past and ensure that the petty differences between the ideologies of these groups or the ambitions of their leaders do not create disruptive conflicts that can affect the focus on the mission of the resistance as they did in the occupied countries of World War Two, especially, as we saw, in France.

When, as will eventually happen, Islam is defeated and its threat to world peace and stability becomes a footnote to history, there will be the satisfaction of telling our children's children that, like the Danes during their fight against Hitler's minions, "We were ALL resistance fighters!"

Here are some of the other resistence fighters who are putting their lives and their principles on the line every day in the struggle against the Islamo-Fascists who are hell-bent, as were the Nazis, at destroying every vestige of freedom and culture on the face of the earth. We strongly recommend that you give them the same support and encouragement that the staff of this blog and our blogfans give:

http://www.shoebat.org/ ( A former P.L.O. terrorist turned true "Feedom Fighter"! One of the most graphic and uncontestable blogs concerning Mohammedan terrorism and atrocities)

http://www.islam-watch.org/ExMuslims/Honour-killings-in-Europe.htm ( No better witnesses to the evils of Islam)

http://www.jpost.com/ (Israel's major English language daily)

http://www.honestreporting.com/ ( Calling every Arab anti-Semitic campaign to account)

http://www.arabsforisrael.com/ ( Showing the "Israel is Apartheid" for the lie it is)

http://www.memri.org/ (English translations of Arabic media for the Arab world-a MUST-SEE!)

http://www.memritv.org/ ( Videos of Mohammedan speeches, hate propoganda and "kill all Jews and Christians" children's television shows with English sub-titles-another MUST-SEE!)

http://www.answering-islam.org/ ( A major anti-Islamic propoganda source. Well documented)

http://news.spirithit.com/index/asia/mor... ( Alternative spirituality in an increasingly violent Islam-threatened world)

http://www.faithfreedom.org/gallery/26.h ( When the "Error 404" message - inserted by racist Mohammedan hackers to confuse you - appears, just click on "Articles" in the left-hand column and go from there. This site terrifies Mohammedans. More graphic evidence of the nature of Islam's true face)

http://middleeastfacts.com/yashiko (Excellently researched and written articles by one of today's fiestiest anti-Islamic campaigners)

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ ( As with Shoebat, extremely graphic evidence of Islamic atrocities as well as penetrating articles on the nature of the Mohammedan psyche)

http://www.al-fatiha.org/ ( An excellent resource and refuge for homosexual and lesbian Mohammedans)

http://misrdigital.blogspirit.com/ ( Egyptian human rights campaigner who was censored and shut down - by Yahoo and YouTube - but re-instated after outrage at their censorship! Articles in Arabic and English - definitely an "In-your-face" human rights activist of heroic stature.)

Any other anti-Islamo-Fascist websites you find will be added as we are notified of them. We need your help to spread the word and keep the flame of Liberty burning in our generation!

On Human Values . . .

2009-03-11T02:04:00.000-07:00

There are certain qualities and values that define each person on this planet. These qualities and values find their expression in the way a person conducts his or her life and the principles they embace as they move through this world during the brief time they spend in this life.. While every man or woman on the face of the earth is, by definition, a universe unto themselves, they are also, whether by chance or by choice, a part of the greater forces that societies generate and can turn from the minor, eye-catching, swirling social dust-devils of a passing fad or eccentric mystical sect into the raging, earth-shattering, cataclysmic tornadoes of extremism wrought by political, religious or social movements which are fueled by the baser human passions of hatred, greed and the lust for power.

In today's world, these more violent and destructive movements are gaining an ascendency which hasn't been witnessed since the Second World War and, sadly, that historically unparalleled horror is barely seventy years behind us. Human nature seems to have a penchant for revisiting its worst evils time and time again.

While the world, with a very few brave exceptions, stood impotently by while the German National Socialist Workers' Party of Germany took seed in a country devastated by war, then defeat and the subsequent humiliation by a coalition of arrogant and short-sighted Allies, the small and then-insignificant political movement became, virtually overnight, the mightiest military and political power of the time growing in the fertile soil of a society bent on recovering its lost glory, dignity and self-respect. The only factor that saved the world from the domination of German arms was that Germany's sole source of social, political and military ambition lay in the hands and mind of a single individual; Adolph Hitler. Once that mind became unstable, once the focus was lost and irrelevant minutae took precedence over political and military pragmatism, the war and the German people were lost. When the German nation condoned, by turning a blind eye to, the growing injustices and atrocities in their midst, they were themselves already lost.

We are now passing through the same political fires that swept the world a mere sixty years ago and, like the Germans, there are those who are, at the least, turning a blind eye to the injustices and atrocities that are occuring daily in every country where Islam has put down its roots. There are the same actors in this recurring drama, such as the B.B.C. which condemned the Jews and sang Hitler's praise during his rise to power and today castigates the tiny State of Israel while lavishing the most unblushing flattery on the Arab nations which worship Mohammed and his writings. In today's world, we see other organizations like Amnesty International and the Red Cross ignore the most obscene abuses of human rights and the articles of the Geneva Convention such as in the cases of the capture and torture of the Israeli Air Force navigator Ron Arad who has been in the hands of Mohammedans for almost thirty-five years and the torture and murder of the two kidnapped Israeli soldiers recently. While turning an intentional and decisively blind eye to these Islamic atrocities, both Amnesty International and the Red Cross work hand-in-hand with recognized terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Fatah to gather real or imagined "evidence" (confirmation of evidence is, to Amnesty International and the Red Cross, irrelevant) with which to castigate the Jews.

As we have pointed out in earlier articles, few souls on the face of the planet could excuse themselves from culpability in Hitler's meteoric rise to power when every word, every line, every paragraph of "Mein Kampf", written in 1924, stated with crystal clarity his intentions of exterminating the Jews, subjugating the "sub-human" non-Aryans of the world and, most explicitly and in the greatest detail, outlined his intentions of invading Russia in order to obtain "Lebensraum", or "living space", for the German nation.

Today, as it has for the past one thousand four hundred years, the "Koran" of the Mohammedans has displayed exactly the same explicit intent of world domination that made "Mein Kampf" the sacred scripture of the German National Socialist Workers' Party.

We are now witnessing the major news networks and media maximizing Israeli flaws, whether real or intentially created out of thin air, while minimizing the horrors and atrocities which are the fruit of Mohammedan theology. The West focused all its energy and political currency on attacking, hunting down and then taunting Sadaam Hussain when they hung him. Why? Because he was a "dictator", was "involved" in 9/11, had "weapons of mass destruction" and had to be removed so "democracy" could grow and thrive in that country.

But what about Saudi Arabia? Are the Saudi Royal family not "dictators"? Weren't fifteen of the nineteen terrorists of the 9/11 atrocity Saudi Arabians? Weren't the Saudi Arabians funding thousands upon thousands of "madrassas" around the world in order to inculcate the Wahabist hatred of the Western "infidels"? Aren't the Saudi Arabians directly responsible for the imminent collapse of Western economies by their raising the price of a barrel of oil to that unprecedented $150+ a barrel? Can a woman drive a car in Saudi Arabia? Can a Jew walk on Saudi soil? Can a woman's punishment as a gang-rape victim be raised from 100 lashes to 200 lashes because she contested the original sentence? Yes, it can . . . and it was.

And yet we are silent in the face of this human social tragedy and, unbelievably, there are individuals and organizations in the West who actually support and justify this society.

Between the Israelis and the Arabs, can Arabs live and work in Israel? What Jew can live and work in Gaza? Can Arabs hold political office in Israel? What Jew sits in the goverment in either Hamas' Gaza or Fatah's West Bank? Can Arabs worship in their mosques in Israel? What Christian can now worship without fear in Bethlehem? Where does the true apartheid lie? Where does the true face of racism and intolerance present itself?

When hatred of the magnitude the Mohammedans display for the West, and for Israel as the symbol of the West in their midst, drives them to their own destruction as we have seen time and again in their squandering of Western aid on weapons and terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians rather than spending it on building a strong and vibrant infrastructure, then there can be no dialogue. Hatred that intense bars any compromise. Hatred that intense becomes a cancer that devours the body and soul of the people who bear it. Hatred that intense bears within itself the seeds of its own destruction.

As we have seen, those who condemn Israel have one thing in common . . . a hatred of Jews. This hatred is so incandescent that it literally blinds them to the atrocities of Islam and the spreading terrorism this faith breeds.

Now, it is time to ask yourself; "What are my values? What are my principles? What will be the side upon which I will stand? Is it for life and hope I want to devote myself, or for hatred, violence and destruction of other human beings? Are the keystones of my soul the search for love, compassion, tolerance and freedom or do I harbor a hatred so deep for mankind that I want to devote it to the oppression of women, the murder of innocents and the barbarity of Sharia Law?"

It is on such personal, soul-searching, individual decisions like this that the fate of nations are founded and the future of the world determined.

It begins with you . . . in the face of all odds to the contrary, you can help change the history of the world by actively and vocally opposing the spread of hatred and intolerance that Islam breeds.

Start now . . . so that you, your children and your grandchildren can live in a world free of at least one more force bent on its destruction.

The Collaboraters. . . . Rachel Corrie

2009-02-27T14:22:00.000-08:00

Her Name Was Rachel Corrie

Rachel Aliene Corrie (April 10, 1979 – March 16, 2003) was an American member of the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) who traveled to the Gaza Strip during the Second Intifada. She was killed by a bulldozer operated by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) during a protest against the destruction of the homes of Palestinian terrorists by the IDF in the Gaza Strip.

One of the most publicized symbols of neo-anti-Semites, Rachel Corrie's life and prejudices are a microcosm of the soul-searing hatred that drive so many of those disparate groups who have banded together to dedicate their lives to finishing the work that the Nazis began and the Mohammedan terrorists are continuing . . . the destruction of the Jewish people.

Rachel Corrie's basic political philosophy dove-tailed well with that of the International Solidarity Movement of which she was a member. This organization has been actively and eagerly engaged in providing both logistical and material support for Mohammedan terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians, making no distiction among Jews, Mohammedans or Christians. Their most notorious support effort was in the arming, aiding and abetting of the two suicide bombers who attacked a Tel Aviv beachside pub, Mike's Place on April 30, 2003. An International Solidarity Movement volunteer later confirmed that the bombers had been among a group of known Palestinian terrorists who were offered tea when they paid a visit to an ISM office on the way to a memorial for Rachel Corrie.

The question now arises; "What are the moral, ethical and political values of those who, like Rachel Corrie, align themselves with Arab and Mohammedan terrorists?" Let's take a look at the values that anti-Israel groups hold so dear and what they find so reprehensible about the State of Israel.

First, the most obvious difference between Israel and the Mohammedan nations surrounding her is that Israel, like America, is a democratic govenment based on the equality of her citizens and the rule of law. Democracy, in the eyes of Islam is anathema.

Israel is also the only nation in the Middle East where Mohammedans, Jews and Christians live side-by-side with no restriction on the practice of their religions. Religious freedom, in the eyes of Islam, is anathema.

Israel is the only nation in the region where each citizen, regardles of sex, has the right and opportunity to pursue his or her chosen direction in life. Both men and women have access to higher education, the workplace, politics, etc. Equality of the sexes is searing anathema in the eyes of Islam.

The International Solidarity Movement, Hamas. Islamic Jihad, the P.L.O., in fact the entire Palestinian population ( or, at least, the entire male sector) despise the values that the Western World hold sacred and Rachel Corrie despised these values no less than the terrorists she supported. If there is any question about that statement, one picture is worth a thousand words.

This photo of Rachel Corrie burning both American and Israeli flags in an hysterical frenzy needs no further commentary. It shows in naked, graphic detail the searing, white-hot hatred she, and those like her, feel for individual freedom and democratic government. Her gut-wrenching hatred for Jews overode any consideration of the plight of the women and children she would be leaving when she tired of playing the dilletante in a land in which she had no personal stake.

We know what Rachel Corrie, and the other Western ISM supporters, despised, but now the next question that obviously arises is; "What do they stand for? What do they hold worth giving their lives for?"

If they hold individual freedom and religious plurality in contempt, then the following conclusions become glaringly obvious.

Rachel Corrie lent her full support to the institutionalized Islamic oppression of women, she fully backed Sharia law which allows girls as young as 6 years old to be subjected to sexual abuse, she had no problem whatsoever with the barbaric "honor killings" of mothers, wives, sisters or daughters as young a 12 years old, the summary, ex-judicial executions of those considered to be"collaboraters" with Israel.

She and her fellow ISM supporters unconditionally applaud the indefensible war crimes of the Palestinian terrorists who specifically target Israeli civilians, she idolized the corrupt Palestinian politicians who she plainly, and daily, witnessed profiting from the theft of international aid meant for the average Palestinian. She and her fellow ISM supporters encouraged, contributed to and facilitated the accumulation of both conventional and unconventional weapons to be used specifically against Israeli women and children.

After her death, in one of the most bizarre demonstrations of what can only be described as cynical Mohammedan humor, her body was "reverantly" draped with . . . guess what? An ersatz American flag!

For some reason, the humor of this bizarre gesture has totally escaped this writer.

Perhaps the ISM were intending to cremate her body along with the American flag she despised so fiercely. . .

While Rachel Corrie has been elevated to the status of an iconic "victim" of "the evil Zionist entity", her story is not an uncommon one. The neo-anti-Semites in the West and every dedicated Mohammedan alive today use the existence of the State of Israel as an excuse to perpetuate the millenia-old goal of exterminating the Jewish people.

As a minor postscript to this issue, it seems interesting to note that Amnesty International, while routinely lashing out against the democratic State of Israel, has, like the ISM, reportedly routinely supplied poloitical, logistical and material support to Palestinian terrorist groups who deliberately target Israeli civilians. We will look into those dark corners of the neo-anti-Semitism in later articles.

Hamas' field trial to a man suspected in drug dealing

2009-02-24T04:57:00.000-08:00

A Little Quiz . . . .

2009-02-13T05:29:00.000-08:00

====================================================================

Based on everything you know about the three great monotheistic religions of the world, this is most probably a photograph of:

1. A blood-thirsty, barbarian Christian Crusader's child.

2. An evil, world-dominating, satanic Zionist oppressor's child.

3. An heroic, peace-loving and infinitely tolerant child of glorious Islam.

======================================================================

Hint: one picture truly is worth a thousand words . . . . denying Mohammedan propaganda !

======================================================================

And the "Yasser" Award Now Goes To . . . Sophie Claudet of "France 24"

2009-02-11T22:49:00.000-08:00

=
=

Truth be told, we do miss Christiane Amanpour.

As the discredited ex-international C.N.N. journalist has faded from the world's media stage, there remain few truly Machiavellian pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic members of the international press, however Ms. Sophie Claudet of France 24 television is clearly nipping at Ms. Amanpour's heels in an effort to overtake and surpass the reputation for yellow journalism that Ms. Amanpour worked so hard to attain and perfect.

On Tuesday, February 10th, in an interview on the international media agency France 24, Ms. Claudet turned in one of the most breathtakingly virtuoso performances of disingenuous pro-terrorist propaganda this writer has ever seen. She actually raised the bar set by Ms. Amanpour by at least a couple of feet.

The vast majority of journalists who have made quite comfortable incomes through Israel-bashing and declaring "being anti-Israel doesn't mean I'm anti-Semitic", are mediocre at best and while, as the world has repeatedly witnessed, they continue to pump out undocumented and unverifiable statements by Arab sources, Ms. Claudet's interview went them one better.

Following the month-long anti-terrorist offensive launched by the Israeli Defence Forces against Hamas Ms. Claudet, who is allegedly based in Ramallah ( rather than in Gaza we might note . . .) but spends a rather inordinate amount of quality time in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, pounded Israel with an iron fist in a velvet glove during her interview.

For those who listened closely, a number of extremely interesting facts emerged about Ms. Claudet's journalistic style. First, while the world at large and the Israeli public as well as the entire Palestinian population were well aware of the impending military operation by the I.D.F against Hamas in the Gaza strip, the actual opening of hostilities found Ms. Claudet, surprisingly, among the hundreds of journalists who, by some odd coincidence, just happened to be caught off-guard outside of Gaza at the time.

During the Second World War, the most respected and dedicated American war correspondant was Ernie Pyle. A man who was always among the troops in the front lines, sending back both gut-wrenching photos and hard-hitting eye-witness descriptions of the naked truth of the war, his dedication to journalism ultimately cost him his life. Had Ms. Claudet been given the assignment of covering that conflict, one can easily imagine her being "caught off-guard" on the beach in Miami on the eve of the war and raging impotently against the U.S government for keeping her from being in the thick of the fighting.

As we watched the virtual traffic-jam of media vehicles, reporters ( Ms. Claudet included) and cameramen criticizing Israel for "forcibly excluding" them from Gaza during Operation Cast Lead, one wonders why they weren't in Gaza in the first place. They certainly had enough time and forewarning to scoot in there with all their equipment before the actual operation began and get up-close and on-the-spot coverage of the conflict. But, like Ms. Claudet, they seem to have been caught completely by surprise despite the stunningly massive build-up of tanks, troops, attack helicopters and other fairly obvious indications of an impending military operation.

Now, having been apparently duped by Israel's troop build-up, and finding herself "forcibly excluded" from the conflict zone by the Israeli military, Ms. Claudet began, apparently, frantically attempting to enter Gaza to cover the hostilities. However, despite her best efforts, and over a month-long operation, Ms. Claudet only managed to "sneak into" Gaza from the Egyptian side a bare two days before the operation ended. One can only imagine how disappointed she must have been to have managed to "sneak into" Gaza so late in the game.

By that time, what she coyly intimated in her interview must have been mountains of bodies of Palestinian women and children, all innocent victims of Israeli (read: Jewish) atrocities, had been removed so, unfortunately, she was unable to document the carnage. But she assured the world they had been there; she was just a bit too late to document it all. Oops . . .

Interestingly, this interview included a taped conversation with an Italian journalist who had actually stayed in Gaza during the hostilities and gave a graphic account of how the Israelis intentionally tried to kill him (omitting to mention that he was not wearing a "Press" jacket at the time) and showed the film crew bullet holes in a car to prove his accusation. The fact that it wasn't his car was beside the point. Our sources also turned up the interesting fact that this particular journalist has in the past acted as an eager conduit for undocumented and unverified accusations against Israel by Hamas officials. Somewhat like our dedicated Ms. Claudet.

While a cursory scan of Ms. Claudet's articles on the Arab-Israeli conflict show a dedication to "exposing" Israeli (again, read: Jewish) injustices, her attacks being somewhat comparable to a pit-bull attacking a small child, she has not, to our knowledge, spent any of her time covering the ex-judicial summary executions of innocent Palestinians by Hamas, the wide-spread practice of "honor killings" of Palestinian women, the rampant corruption of Palestinian politicians of all stripes, the kidnapping and torture of foreign journalists (which may explain her adorably coy reluctance to base herself in Gaza rather than West Jerusalem or Tel Aviv ), the indiscriminate firing of Kassam and Grad rockets into civilian centers in Israel, homicide terrorist bombings of Israeli civilians, the indoctrination of Palestinian children to consider "martyrdom" (read: homicide bomber) as the highest goal to which they can aspire, or any of the other more uncivilized aspects of Palestinian society.

While Ms. Christiane Amanpour's anti-Semitic journalistic vitriol was basically fueled by the financial advantages to be gained from accomodating Arab sources, Ms. Claudet's hatred of Jews seems to be so deeply rooted that it not only enables her to turn a blind eye to the most blatent examples of Islamic barbarism, it has actually driven her to become what Ms. Christiane Amanpour never was . . . an ideologically motivated terrorist collaborator and propagandist.

We also found it interesting to note that the France 24 interviewer never raised the question of why Ms. Claudet spent all but the last two days of the conflict safely ensconsed in Israel and well out of harm's way while other foreign journalists managed to stay in the danger zone and were able to cover the conflict first-hand. Nor did the interviewer bother to raise the question of what compelled Israel to launch this operation. Embarassing question, that . . . ?

And so . . . . we most respectfully and, with grudging admiration for her dedication to the Hearst principles of reportage, present Ms. Claudet with the coveted "Yasser" award for yellow journalism, bless her little heart . . .

=
=

Hamas leader admitting to using women and children as human shields

2009-02-11T04:45:00.000-08:00

While the various international news organizations like the B.B.C., C.N.N., France 24, Sky and myriad local and national European media devote a great deal of toil, sweat, tears and blood to "exposing" the "evils" of Israel's "disproportionate" response to Hamas' eight year long campaign of terrorist rocket attacks on civilian populations in Israel, they seem either strangely and inexplicably unaware of the most public pronouncements of Palestinian political officials and religious leaders such as the ones stated in the video posted above, or they are so sympathic to the Palestinian goal of exterminating the Jews that such baldly proclaimed admissions of internationally recognized war crimes justify the ends.

We find it a bit odd that, like so many of her journalistic collegues, Ms. Sophie Claudet, a senior Middle East correspondent for France 24 television, has, to our knowledge, never printed, spoken or broadcast the slightest criticism of these declarations while finding quite a bit of energy to condemn Israeli military operations against internationally recognized terrorist organizations such as Hamas, conveniently "misremembering" that the Israel Defence Forces and their elite commando units actually telephone intended targets prior to an attack in order to enable the families to evacuate their houses before they are hit. Apparently, Ms. Claudet doesn't consider it quite sporting to extend the same warnings to Jews.

We are still waiting for the U.N., Amnesty International, the Red Cross, U.N.R.W.A., the E.U. and, of course, the B.B.C. or C.N.N. to describe or officially classify these acts of terror and the openly proclaimed policy of using civilians as human shields by Hamas as "war crimes".

And, given the U.N.'s past history of rape, pillage and plunder in Africa, the Balkans and other areas under its "protection", as well as the demonstrated sympathy of the Red Cross, Amnesty International and the E.U. for Mohammedan outrages, we certainly aren't going to hold our breath . . . .

From the "Why Am I Not Surprised?" Files . . .

2009-02-07T00:38:00.000-08:00

The United Nations' premier "humanitarian works" agency, U.N.R.W.A., informed the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) on Friday, February 6th, that it is suspending its humanitarian aid deliveries to the Gaza Strip after Hamas had, in broad daylight, stolen hundreds of tons of supplies the United Nations organization had transferred to the Palestinian territory from donor countries around the world.

The seizure of the more than 200 tons of supplies took place Thursday and in response, U.N.R.W.A. officials informed the Gaza Coordination and Liaison Administration that it was suspending its deliveries to the Gaza Strip until further notice. The supplies confiscated included flour and other basic commodities as well as camoflage uniforms, boots, and other non-humanitarian items.

The transfer of 40 truckloads of "humanitarian supplies" - some 800 tons - planned for Sunday has already been canceled.

Officials in Jerusalem said the announcement by U.N.R.W.A. constituted an involuntary and grudging UN confirmation of Israel's position, that Hamas is using the Palestinian population in Gaza "cruelly and cynically" and is solely responsible for the hardship there and not the defensive closing of crossings by the Israeli military.

The theft of humanitarian aid exposes the true face of Hamas and of its supporters in Iran and completely discredits the picture of a starving and destitute population as portrayed by Reuters, the B.B.C., AP, France 24 and other Western pro-terrorist media organizations whose CEOs and senior editorial officials have profited quite handsomely from grateful Arab "gratuities" for their work over the years.

It was the second time this week that Hamas stole UN supplies transferred to the Gaza Strip for "impoverished" Palestinians. The first incident took place Tuesday evening when armed Hamas police broke into a Gaza warehouse packed with UN humanitarian supplies and seized tens of thousands of blankets and food packages as well as the non-humanitarian military material.

Interestingly, an earlier news item widely reported by the media on the damage to a U.N. warehouse in Gaza by an Israeli tank shell graphically showed the damage caused by the shell but also, inadvertantly, showed that the warehouse was stuffed to the rafters with supplies that the U.N. had agreed with both Hamams and Fatah to withold from the population in order to bolster the media images of the Palestinians' claims of "poverty" and "destitution" caused by the closing of crossing points by the Israeli military.

The seizure of these supplies by Hamas took place after U.N.R.W.A. staff earlier refused to hand over the aid supplies to the Hamas-run Ministry of Social Affairs.

"We received a phone call this morning from U.N.R.W.A. officials that they have decided to suspend their deliveries after Hamas stole supplies from one of the organization's warehouses in the Gaza Strip," explained a senior official.

The IDF had earlier noticed the trend during Operation Cast Lead last month, when despite the fighting, Israel transferred close to 80 trucks a day to the Strip which were promptly seized by Hamas officials and sold for exorbitant blackmarket prices to the Arab population.

While this particular incident resulted in a negative response from the U.N., this has been an on-going co-operative practice between the U.N. agency and Palestinian terrorist organizations ever since the establishment of U.N.R.W.A. offices inside the Palestinian camps and cities over the past forty years.

Nuaf Atar, a Fatah operative captured during the operation, confirmed the war profiteering by Hamas officials and party members when he told the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) that Hamas government officials "took over" humanitarian aid Israel allowed in to the Gaza Strip and sold it when it was supposed to be distributed for free.

While U.N.R.W.A. Spokesman Sami Mshasha confirmed that the organization had suspended its deliveries to Gaza after Hamas stole its supplies, he refused any comment on past complicity by his agency in withholding supplies from the Gaza and West Bank populations or his agency's close relationship with internationally designated terrorist organizations such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

"This is the second incident this week and this is a point of great concern for us and sets a bad precedent and if we are to provide services to people in Gaza after such an ordeal we need assurances that our work will be unimpeded," Mshasha said. He reportedly continued,"We cannot subjugate our work to the Ministry of Social Affairs in Gaza, since that cuts deeply into our profits"

If it weren't so tragic, it would be laughable to consider that the old adage about "there is no honor among theives" has rarely been so clearly illustrated as in this case where the U.N.'s premier "humanitarian aid agency", U.N.R.W.A., which for years has collaborated with and provided logistical and material support to Palestinian terrorists, has now been victimized by those same terrorists they so enthusiastically supported.

There truly is a G-d in this world . . .

Words of Wisdom . . .

2009-02-06T14:54:00.000-08:00

Whenever the violent and psychotic acts of the Mohammedans against the innocents provokes you to retaliate in kind, just remember the words of one of the wisest and most experienced humans to ever walk this earth:

"To refrain from imitation is the best revenge."

The Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius, "To Myself", Book 6, Verse 6

An Idle Thought . . .

2009-02-06T00:06:00.000-08:00

It just occured to me that the comparision by pro-Mohammedan, pro-terrorist groups and individuals of the Israeli defensive barrier wall to the Berlin wall erected by the Russians at the height of the Cold War seems more than a bit farcical.

The main images that have been burned into the conciousness of the world by the Berlin Wall are the photos and films of the East Germans who risked their lives diving through forests of barbed-wire and clambering over that slate-gray wall to escape from the oppression on Communism.

The interesting thing is that since the erection of the Israeli defensive barrier, not one image has been taken or one foot of film shot of an Israeli Arab risking his or her life by scrabbling over the wall INTO the Palestinian areas. Even Reuters and the AP, both noted for their staged and choreographed images of "oppressed Mohammedans" whether in the Palestinian areas or the Lebanon, have been unable to bring themselves ( as yet ) to create a fantasy image of that magnitude.

They do, however, routinely, show the tens of thousands of Palestinians who wait daily to get INTO the "despised Zionist Entity" for work and an honest living that Hamas and the corrupt and violent Palestinian leadership have denied them in their own lands.

That thought just brings an interesting perspective to the hysterical rantings of the Jew-haters in this world . . .

Notes from the Holy Land

2009-02-05T00:56:00.000-08:00

It's been a while since we've been able to post a new article on our blog and things have changed fairly drastically in many ways since our last posting. As always in this life, some of the changes were for the better and, to keep us on our toes, some were naturally for the worst, but we roll with the punches and, as this snowy-pated generation used to say, "We keep on truckin'".

Things are jogging along as best as can be expected given the looming cloud of economic Armageddon that's gathering world-wide these days. I feel like someone sitting quietly on a hilltop under a spreading oak tree on a crisp, clear summer's day watching with growing fascination and horror as I watch two thundering hundred-car freight trains hurtling toward each other at the foot of the hill around a blind bend at full steam.

Bucking the seemingly universal euphoria that has accompanied Obama's election as President, I just have a gut-wrenching feeling that this is a disaster of monumental proportions just waiting to happen. The fact that within the first couple of weeks of his administration he's chosen a couple of the most corrupt and scoff-law politicians on the Hill for positions of power, and then been forced to admit that he "screwed up" is hardly the stuff to inspire reckless confidence in his ability to handle the impending decisions he'll have to make that will, literally, mean life or death to millions, if not billions of people around the world.

While his election as a black president has undoubtedly been an historic event in the history of a traditionally white, conservative political community in America, he's not going to be able to coast on his color in the face of internationally color-blind power politics. For the aggressive, power-hungry and, increasingly religiously fanatic Mohammedan political forces rearing their heads, sniffing for the scent of fear in the West and testing the new opposition, the color of the blood in Obama's jugular vein is the same as any other victim's no matter the color of their skin.

Now, here in Israel, we're looking forward to our own elections in the near future and, hopefully, we'll see a more pragmatic and less corrupt administration under someone like Benjamin ( Bibi ) Netanyahu. Our dream team is Netanyahu, Moshe Arens, Natan Sharanski and a few of the political young Turks to the right of center. With Olmert leaving with a cloud of corruption trailing in his wake and other high ranking politicos facing serious police scrutiny, the nation's definitely ready for our own clean sweep for "Change" and Hope" for which the U.S. voted. Fortunately, the choices we have in Israel have already been battle-hardened and will be up to the tasks before them. Obama seems to feel he can pick up the hang of the presidency as he goes along. Not a good sign.

The major voting bloc in Israel is the Russian community and, contrary to the intentions of the Left Wing who brought them over by the hundreds of thousands in the hope they would bolster the Leftist Socialist parties, have been some of the most pragmatic, right-wing voters in the country. After so many of them endured the horrors of the Second World War and experienced first-hand the terror of the Nazi regime, they are listening with an extremely critical ear to the rhetoric of Ahmadinajad's anti-Semitic rants and the terrorist tactics of today's Muslims in general. They, before anyone else, realize that they no longer have the vast, empty, frozen wastelands of the Soviet steppes and the ferocious Russian winter to protect them from the Arabs as they protected them against the Nazis. Where they were used to measuring distances in tens of thousands of kilometers, now they measure in tens of hundreds of meters. This entire nation of Israel holds barely a third of the population of the city of Moscow. Now they can not only see the wolf at their doorstep, but can actually hear him panting. I think Bibi's going to be our next Prime Minister.

While the mainstream media is still overwhelmingly biased with oil-soaked reportage in this neck of the woods, there are growing signs that the Arabs grossly misplayed their hand when they jacked up the price of oil to over $150 a barrel last year. The reverberations from that money-grab have further crippled already reeling economies around the world and now the new Leader of the European Union, Czechoslovakia, is voicing, for the first time, a loud and unequivical denounciation of the Arab States and Islamic terror. The President came out and boldly stated that is was sheer insanity to pour billions and billions of dollars into the Palestinian territories for reconstruction, humanitarian projects and infrastructure when Hamas just takes the money, squirrels most of it away in Swiss numbered accounts and then turns around and provokes Israel by firing rockets into civilian populations which means repeated destruction of the "reconstructed" areas by the Israeli forces. . . and then, of course, another financial windfall for the corrupt Palestinian leaders who whine and whimper about their demolished homes and lands.

Our oldest son is thriving in the army now. He's back home almost every other weekend and it's a bizarre feeling for an ex-American G.I. ( me :-) who was posted halfway around the world during the Vietnam War to have a son whose most likely battleground would be just hours from his own house. I think it must be even more traumatic for the Russian parents of the soldiers serving in the Israeli Army. Again, it's that awareness of the distance thing.

I'm going to take a break here and add an e-mail that we got from one of the guys I work with. I think it deserves some kudos for giving a bit of insight into Israel that I don't have the talent for. The guy's name is Lior ( Lee - OR ) and he and his family went down south with some stuff for the troops fighting the terrorists in Gaza. I'll let it speak for itself:

========================================
Lior's Update:

I just got back from the Gaza Israeli border. Yesterday, as some of you may know, our son called us in the morning to tell us that his unit was being pulled for 2 days from Gaza to rest and refit and that they were going to let the parents of the soldiers come and visit briefly.

I immediately told my boss that I had to go and see him. He gave me the day off and offered to get a ride to that area., The company I work for was sending 2 cars to the area to the local hospital to take gifts to the wounded soldiers in the hospital in Beer Sheva.

Later he told me that the company was gathering things for me to take. Then shortly thereafter he offered a company car for me to take, his own personal company vehicle, as he went out and gathered items to send to our soldiers fighting in the south.

During the night we got calls from Pinny, our son, that they were moving out at dawn. We weren't happy. Then in the morning he told us they would move out at around 10 am.

We left at 8 am. Its about 250 kms to there from where we live in the north in Carmiel. In the car were my wife, a close friend of the family Paula and myself driving. Paula's boyfriend, Noah wanted to come but he was afraid he might lose his job if he took the day off. Our other son, Shlome, wanted to come and also our daughter, Chana.

It seemed a little too dangerous to take him with us. I would not been able to deal with it if he was hurt in a rocket attack.

And Chana wanted to come but we were too pressed for time to make the detour to get her in Tel Aviv.

We took off and were in constant communication with Pinny.

The car had a GPS that took me in the wrong direction. So I used the old fashioned way, pull over and check the map. LPS, (Lior Positioning System).

By the time his unit was on the move we were still 100 kms away. Also, as we left 3 rockets hit the northern Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona.

We were worried but, as I told my wife, our mission was to get to the south. The chances looked pretty slim that we would catch them before they deployed again. I have been on numerous US Army deployments and I know first hand that things get delayed. I relayed this to her and prayed to God silently that we would find him. Although personally at the time I gave it a 2% chance of success.

As all this was going on, the driver of the vehicle that was transporting the soldiers, a civilian, overheard my son speaking Spanish on his cellphone. He asked him where he was from and my son relayed the whole story. As it turned out the driver was from the same town, Carmiel, as we are.

Shortly after that the bus they were on experienced some mysterious mechanical malfunctionsn that kept delaying them.

In the mean time we were called by a liaison to the army that had heard we were coming with food and snacks for the soldiers from the north and told us how to get close to where they were being deployed and promised to get the items to the soldiers.

We ended up south of Sderot ( Google it ) at a crossroad to a kibbutz call Be'eri. Army activity was extreme. You could hear the jets and helicopters flying overhead.

As we came around the corner we saw a bus pulled over with 3 officers yelling at the driver and the driver scratching his head looking at the engine.

Just then our son came out with his sergeant and waved us in. We had quite an emotional moment. We got out and started to hand out bags of food and snacks, some brought by us, some provided by friends, some by the company and cookies baked by a friend of ours, Sarah, and of course Coca Cola and two large trays of food. ( Chicken Fajitas and a Cuban dish called Picadillo). . . Google it.

The officers came over and clearly they were upset. Once they realized who we were, how far we came and what we risked to get there they quickly realized they had been had by the bus driver.

It was a miracle, suddenly, the bus started and was running fine.

While we got to spend time with our son 2 rockets landed nearby. My wife asked me about the noise and I innocently told here it must be trucks bouncing down the road. We could clearly see the buildings on fire in Gaza from there, from the airstrikes.

We took pictures, ate and spent time with him.

The morale of the soldiers was low when we got there.. However when they saw us and realized also what it took for a family to drive there they were amazed. One came up to us and told us that up until they saw us they were wondering what the hell were they doing.

Then they said now they understood what they were fighting for and that if there were common citizens willing to risk their lives to bring them food and gifts they could understand who they were fighting for also.

They loved the hot food and the cookies, candies and cakes.

We stayed as long as we could and then we had to leave.

It was 505 kms roundtrip. Thank God for my stubbornness, the bus driver, my wife's ability to handle 2 cell phones simultaneously, her ability to cook, the company, especially my boss, and the chance to see my wife's and my son's faces light up when they saw each other.

You never know what tomorrow brings so we just went for it.

Life is full of good moments and bad.

Today was a good day.

Lior
=========================================

That's pretty much a "slice-of-life" peek at what goes on in this country. As in so many other situations, the key to the success of something can depend on the most unusual factors, in this case it was the simple ploy of a stubborn ( and typically compassionate ) bus driver that saved the day.

And now, on to more mundane matters. We're slowly coming out of winter now, with the last gasp of rain squalls drenching the north and center of the country. Pretty soon it will be Spring again in the Holyland, the weather will be hotting up and the sweltering winds coming off the Jordanian desert will be driving Israelis to the beaches of the Mediterranean and the Sea of Galilee. Slim, seductive, olive-skinned Israeli girls will be sharing the sands with the older Russian women who are, essentially, pallid beachballs with legs at the best of times. There will be the wafting, mouth-watering smells from the seasoned lamb kabobs over the charcoal grills, the sweet, cloying smoke of the mint and honey soaked tobacco of the nargilas ( hookah water pipes) and the throbbing sounds of the Middle East music blaring out of little Fiats and Skodas driven by teenage Arabs and Sephardic Jews crusing the beach-side drives.

While the tension of this neighborhood is always in the air, somehow Israelis, whether Jews, Arabs or Christians, all manage to find a way to relax together, even if it seems to be in constant high gear.

The on-going war against Hamas and the Palestinians is one in defense of this pluralistic democracy, the rule of law and a drive for progress scientifically, socially and religiously and it will be a never-ending one until the Palestinian Mohammedans have been pounded back into the desert.

For those who brand Israel as a "racist" state, I would ask them where the Jews are in Gaza? Where have the Christians of Bethlehem disappeared to? While Nazareth, the home of Jesus, in the Jewish State of Israel, boasts one of the largest and most prosperous Christian communities in the Middle East, Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus has seen its Christian community dwindle to less than 20% of what it was before the Palestinians took control. Now it has become a city where Christians live in fear, held to their homes only through their faith while enduring constant harassment and attacks by the Mohammedan occupiers.

As we continue our struggle against the forces of barbarism in the shape of Mohammedan terror fueled by Arab oil and the ever-present anti-Semitism spawned over the centuries by the Catholic Church and the Mohammedans, the iron-clad fact that sustains us is that we have not only endured and survived the terrors and tribulations of the Egyptians, the Babylonians, the Greeks, the mighty colossus that was once Rome, the scourge of the Church and the Mosque, the abasement by the Ottoman Turks, the satanic psychosis of the Nazis, and now the pure evil of Islamic terror, but we have, against all historical odds, actually regained our ancient homeland and thrived and prospered in the arts, the sciences, the humanities, blazing new pathways for healing and uplifting the mind, the body and the soul of the world.

Like Lior said . . . . it's been a good day.

Few really nice photos of the religion of peace.

2008-07-21T09:20:00.000-07:00

Appeasing Islam

2008-03-30T08:42:00.001-07:00

Fatah are supposed to be "the moderates",

2008-03-12T06:33:00.000-07:00

by helen o

Fatah are supposed to be "the moderates", with whom Israel is negotiating; how much harder to negotiate with Hamas, who consider Fatah to be a weak puppet organization, in the pocket of he Western world?Imagine a Christian walking into a Hindu school & opening fire on students as they were learning their holy books…… Then imagine that, not only had he murdered eight young students & wounded more than 30, but just try to visualize groups of Christians breaking out in song & dance to celebrate this "Brave victory".It's impossible to do so in the civilized world. But this is exactly what occurred in the recent Hamas terrorist attack in Jerusalem. The act itself was not only horrific & cowardly, but what took place afterwards in much of Gaza & in many parts of the Arabic world was downright revolting. Thousands of Hamas supporters came out into the streets to rejoice at their “brave Arabic martyr” who had the guts to shoot unarmed students as they were sitting & studying. Adults in Gaza passed out candies to the children & to passers-by who were honking their car horns in mad support. This display is indeed frightening, but it is also enlightening, for it shows their true colors for everyone to see.Islam under Hamas & Hezbollah has proven itself to be anything but a religion of peace. One needs only to look at nearly every hot spot on the planet to see that somehow, in some way, & usually very directly, the Moslems are frequently there making chaos, destroying, killing - all in the name of their “holy” beliefs - in Russia, Indonesia, Africa, the Middle East, Europe & the USA.On February 20, 1998 in London the Azzam Organization, issued the text of a dua (a prayer-sermon instructing the believer how to answer the call of Islam) to be read in mosques worldwide during the key Friday prayer. The Azzam Organization reminded the listeners and readers that Prophet Muhammad decreed that "indeed Dua is the weapon of the Believer."

Are you ready for this?

O ALLAH! Inspire Muslims in important, strategic and influential positions around the world to use their skills, whether it be computer knowledge or financial ability, to RETALIATE against the enemy in every part of the World!

O ALLAH! KUFR IS ONE NATION, so even though the MUJAHIDEEN may not be able to retaliate in Iraq, allow your MUJAHIDEEN fighters in the other parts of the World to retaliate against the KAFIR NATION!

O ALLAH! Cause this retaliation to come in the form of attacks by HAMAS on Israel!

O ALLAH! Cause this retaliation to come in the form of attacks by Ibnal-Khattab and the Foreign Mujahideen in CHECHNYA against the Russians!

O ALLAH! Cause this retaliation to come in the form of attacks by Osama bin Laden and other brave fighters from the Arabian Gulf on the FOREIGN FORCES in the GULF COUNTRIES!

O ALLAH! Cause this retaliation to come in the form of intensified attacks on the Hindu forces in KASHMIR!

O ALLAH! Cause this retaliation to come in the form of intensified attacks on ISRAEL from Mujahideen across the borders of Jordan and Lebanon!

O ALLAH! Cause the RIGHTEOUS SCHOLARS IN THE ARABIAN GULF to rebel against the foreign policies of their Governments and speak out for the TRUTH!

O ALLAH! Cause the authorities of Muslim countries to turn a BLIND EYE on retaliatory attacks by Mujahideen on Foreign Forces on their soils!

O ALLAH! CAUSE SO MUCH DAMAGE AND DESTRUCTION AND CONFUSION TO THE INVADING FORCES THAT THEY LEARN A LESSON WHICH WILL GO DOWN IN HISTORY AND CAUSE THEM LOSSES WHICH WILL MAKE THEIR GULF WAR LOSSES LOOK LIKE NOTHING!

DENMARK ! - Again, a Light to All the Free Nations!

2008-02-16T11:46:00.000-08:00

Denmark - once again, this tiny country among the nations of the world, has taken a stand that confirms its place as the enduring symbol of adamant opposition to totalitarianism and its dedication to the spirit of freedom and justice in a world where these values are too often overshadowed by political opportunism, appeasement and greed.

In recent weeks, the Danish Intelligence agencies arrested three Mohammedan terrorists who had been planning the assassination of the Danish political cartoonist who had portrayed a caricature of Mohammad as a terrorist, his head wrapped with a turban-swathed bomb.

When this information was made public, 17 Danish newspapers. in a courageous ( in today's atmosphere of knuckling-under to Mohammedan terrorist threats ) display of moral and ethical will, simultaneously re-published the most famous of those cartoons - the one whose artist's life had been threatened.

This was a collective act of defiance that stands unparalleled in today's oil-soaked media community.

Denmark stood alone, and far above, the European nations savaged by Nazi aggression during the Second World War. Only Denmark willingly, spontaneously and collectively, protected and saved the lives of tens of thousands of Jews who had for centuries been loyal Danes and had contributed so productively to their country's culture and society.

While others, notably the French and Eastern Europeans had sprung eagerly to the task of collaberating with the Nazis, the Danes were the most dedicated Europeans in their resistance to allowing the Nazis to entrench themselves in, and destroy, a civilized nation's society.

The are no superlatives in the English language worthy to be used in describing Denmark's collective national dedication to the highest of human morals and values.

Contrast this to the current policies in Europe today where, for example, Britain has banned children's books portraying pigs, since it would offend Mohammedans, or the insanity of the British Prison System which has mandated the realignment of toilets in the prisons away from the direction of Mecca, so as, again, not to offend Mohammedan sensibilities. These being, of course, the sensibilities of Mohammedan criminals who commited some of the most heinous crimes against civilized British society.

While the staff here at this blog are doing our utmost to defy and defeat the spread of Islam and its doctrines of hatred, terror and totalitarianism, we realize that this effort is merely a drop in the ocean of the electronic sea of the Internet. This is a small forum and one certainly not widely bruited about among the movers and shakers whose voices carry weight in the war against Islam. But in a war, even the lowly sandbag can contribute to the defense of the warriors actively engaged in opposition to the advance of evil.

If we can aid and support the Danes, as they aided and supported the Jews, then our small efforts here will not have been in vain.

God commanded Israel to be a light to all the nations . . . the Danes took that task upon themselves unasked and with no regard for reward either in this life or the next.

That places them, as a nation, on a pinnacle of moral, ethical and spiritual achievement that stands unmatched in human history.

More than that cannot be said of any mortal on the face of this earth.

The "Sacred" holiday of Ashura

2008-01-18T05:02:00.000-08:00

How touching...!

If anyone wants a clearer picture of the heart and essence of Islam, they need look no further than these images of one of the most sacred holidays of the Islamic calendar . . . Ashura.

While other major religions, as well as the vast majority of minor ones, focus their holiest observances on spiritual renewal and the atonement for past transgressions against their fellow men, Islam directs its attention to the darker side of human nature. It glorifies, as these representative images illustrate, violence, blood-lust and hatred of all that is truly spiritual in the souls of good individuals everywhere.

The obscenity of the "festival" of Ashura makes any sado-masochistic orgy in San Francisco look like a Victorian tea party. This is the core and root of Islam.

Even the Haj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia that is commanded of every Mohammedan at least once in their life, is an open dedication to the naked and aggressive hatred which Islam harbors against all "infidels".

For years, the symbolic stoning of the pillar representing Satan during the Haj was turned into a political as well as a religious act when the pillar was painted with both the Star of David and the Christian cross. This ingrained hatred of all that is not Islamic is rooted deep in the Surahs of the Koran. This doctrine was a direct result of the refusals by the Jews and Christians to acknowledge Mohammed as "the final prophet" of G-d during his early years of proselytizing

History and current events show how right they were to reject this Satanic cult.

Every major confrontation between cultures has had individuals who voiced their warnings . . . and were ignored. England turned a deaf ear to Churchill's prophetic opposition to Nazi Germany while embracing a weak-willed Chamberlain's pathetic attempts to appease Hitler, with results that devastated the Western World.

In our adamant opposition to, and denunciation of, Islam and its followers who stand silent in the face of its daily atrocities, we will stand with the modern Churchills who speak out boldly, honestly and bravely against this Islamic threat to mankind which is once again rearing its ugly head to destroy all that is good, spiritual and tolerant in the human heart and in the world at large.

Will you be a Churchill or a Chamberlain?

Your fate and the fate of your children and your children's children hang in the balance . . . !

Ahmed the dead terrorist

2008-01-14T06:47:00.001-08:00

The best revenge . . . . . !

While Islamic terrorism in itself is, like the Nazi atrocities it seeks to emulate, one of the greatest threats to modern civilization, one of the best defenses we have against such barbarism is our ability to rise above the Mohammedan mentality and turn it upon itself . . . to show its inate ignorance and primitiveness.

The ability to ridicule these Mohammedans is one of the greatest responses we can make to their bloody but ultimately futile attempts to intimidate all civilized cultures around the world.

The evidence of this is the fact that, at the time this video was downloaded from YouTube today, December 14, 2008, there had been over 24,000,000 ( that's right, boys and girls . . . . twenty four MILLION ) hits on this and the numbers are rising geometrically every day.

The Mohammedans are, truth be told, no more than psychotic clowns who will stain the name of Islam for tens of generations to come.

Enjoy the video . . . and know that truth, morality and traditional ethics wil overcome and outlast these barbarians.

Peace and love . . . !

Western Civilization at the Crossroad . . . !

2007-12-01T04:13:00.001-08:00

There have been many times when the fate of Western civilization has reached a critical crossroad and, whether through chance, choice or compulsion, has taken a direction which has had irreversible and incalculable effects on the future development of mankind.

When, in 490 B.C.E., the Persian monarch Darius I made his first concerted attempt at a land invasion to conquer the Greek city-states, his force of approximately 50,000+ Persian troops were met by a smaller force of 8,000+ Greek and allied troops under the command of Militiades, Callimachus and Arimestus on the plain of Marathon. Against all odds, the Greeks won a decisive victory and ensured the continued existence and development of Greek culture that would shape the future of Western Civilization.

Ten years later, in 480 B.C.E., the Athenian commander Themistocles won, against all odds and a Persian force more than twice the size of his own, a naval victory in the Straits of Salamis that led to the defeat of the Persian navy and the eventual crumbling of the Persian Empire.

That fate was sealed at the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 B.C.E. when Alexander the Great, with his 40,000 troops, faced the overwhelming might of Darius III and his estimated 200,000 Persian and allied forces. Alexander's brillant and tactically stunning generalship swept the field leaving over 50,000 Persian casualties while sustaining losses of less than 4,000 of his own troops.

During the Middle Ages, battles were fought by Crusaders and Mohammedans that determined the fate, not only of the Holy Land, but of European civilization itself. In 1187 the forces of Saladin overwhelmed and defeated the knights of Guy de Lusignon at the Battle of Hattin near Tiberius, opening the way for the Mohammedans' further conquests that eventually led to the expulsion of the Crusaders from the Middle East as both a political and religious influence and placed Israel under the iron heel of Islamic oppression for almost 750 years.

The most recent historical threat to civilized societies was the rise of the National Socialist Party in Germany prior to and during the Second World War. When Adolph Hitler wrote "Mein Kampf" while in Landsberg prison in 1924, he outlined in the most meticulous detail each and every policy he intended to follow should he ever gain political power in Germany.

For those of you who have never read this magnum opus of Hitler's, it contains, in stark black and white, the blueprint for his extermination of the Jews and all other "untermenchen", or sub-humans, such as the Slavs, Gypsies, Russians, etc. as well as an unabashed determination to acquire "lebensraum", or "living space", for the German nation which would be taken from the Russians.

In my personal opinion, "Mein Kampf" and "The Koran" should be required reading in every school and college Political Science class, to be read and analysed as the supreme examples of the roots of fascist and totalitarian political/religious philosophies throughout the civilized world.
Forewarned is forearmed . . . ! !

These goals and the methods by which Hitler intended to achieve them were there for all the world to see nine years before his Nazi Party gained seats in the German Reichstag and twelve years before he became Chancellor of the German nation.

And yet the world did nothing . . . . .

Ah, I apologize . . . the world did do something . . . it appeased Hitler.

The Western Powers waffled and wavered. They hemmed and hawed. They sacrificed the Danzig Corridor, they abandoned the Sudetenland, they watched in self-imposed impotency as Austria fell to the Wehrmacht and the Gestapo began its reign of terror.

Neville Chamberlain, to Britain's everlasting shame, licked Hitler's boots and brought home a piece of paper "guaranteeing peace in our times". That piece of paper cost Europe and Russia over 70 million dead and uncounted maimed, wounded and disabled. Over half of those were Russians.

Now, at this critical crossroads in the history of the world, we are faced with a greater threat than that of the Nazi juggernaut that cut such a brutal swathe through the nations of Eurpope and Africa.

That threat is Islam.

In the Koran, as in "Mein Kampf", the aims and methods of Islam to dominate the world and to lay waste Western Civilization are laid out in meticulous detail. There is no need to invent a plagarized "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" to incriminate the Mohammedan in his clearly stated intent. There is no need to invent a spurious "international conspiracy" as the anti-Semites have lodged against the Jews.

The Koran itself lays out in precise and exhaustive detail, as Hitler did in "Mein Kampf" for the Nazis, the ambition and intent of Islam to conquer, enslave or exterminate the "infidel" wherever he may be found.

Here, below, are Koranic verses, the "holy scriptures" of Islam itself, nothing added, nothing omitted.

This is Islam's detailed blueprint for your fate should they ever gain the upper hand. . . as we see so blatantly illustrated on a daily basis in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Malaysia, Syria, etc. :

=====================================================================

Bukhari:V4B52N260 -"The Prophet said, ‘If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him!’"

Sura ( 5:51) - "Believers, take not Jews and Christians for your friends."

Sura (8:12) - "I am with you; so support those who believed. I will strike terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved. You may strike them above the necks, and you may strike even every finger."

Sura (2:216) - Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.

Sura (3:151) - Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority.

Sura (9:5) Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the non-believers wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.

Sura (2: 98) – "Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers."

Sura (2: 191-193) – "Kill them [unbelievers] wherever you find them….Fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah."

Sura (2: 216) – "Fighting is enjoined on you, and it is an object of dislike to you; and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you love a thing while it is evil for you, and Allah knows, while you do not know."

Sura (3: 19) – "Surely the true religion with Allah is Islam…and whoever disbelieves in the communications of Allah then surely Allah is quick in reckoning."

Sura (4: 104) – "Be not weak in pursuit of the enemy."

Sura (5: 51) – "O you who believe! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whosoever among you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."

Sura (8: 12) – "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."

Sura (8: 15-17 ) – "O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve marching for war, turn not your backs to them. Whoever shall turn his back to them on that day – unless he turn aside for the sake of fighting or withdraws to a company – then he, indeed, becomes deserving of Allah’s wrath, and his abode is hell… So you did not slay them, but it was Allah who slew them…that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is Hearing, Knowing."

Sura (9: 29) – "Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth… until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection."

(N.B.: The "tax" referred to here is the "Dhimmi" tax which requires each non-Mohammedan to pay an exorbitant tax for the "privilege" of living relatively unmolested under Islam rule.)

Sura (9 :33 ) – "[Allah] it is who sent His Apostle with guidance and the religion of truth, that He might cause it to prevail over all religions, though polytheists may be averse."

Sura ( 8:60 ) - "Infidels (non-Muslims) should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them."

Bukhari [4:52:177]: Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him !"

Bukhari, V1B4N234: "The prophet advised them to drink the urine of the camels. Later on when they killed the prophet's shepherd, the prophet seized them, gouged out their eyes, cut their hands and legs, and left them thirsty in the desert to die."

Source(s):

Some other sources, many from EX-MOHAMMEDANS THEMSELVES can be found at:
http://camera.org/
http://www.islamwatch.org/ExMuslims/Hon...
http://www.americancongressfortruth.com/
http://www.jpost.com/
http://www.honestreporting.com/
http://www.arabsforisrael.com/
http://www.memri.org/
http://www.memritv.org/
http://www.answering-islam.org/
http://news.spirithit.com/index/asia/mor...
http://www.faithfreedom.org/gallery/26.h...
http://smoothstone.blogspot.com/2004/08/...
http://middleeastfacts.com/yashiko
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

====================================================================

Who among our readers are prepared to resist this new Nazism ?

Are you going to go down on your knees in the face of Islamic terrorism and hope that by appeasing this ravenous monster with "small sacrifices" ( . . . like Israeli Jews ) as the Allied nations did to Hitler in sacrificing the Danzig Corridor, the Sudetenland and Austria . . . hoping his hunger would be appeased by these dainty morsels?

Your only choices now, as in 1939, are resistance . . . . or enslavement and death !

And, as we've witnessed time after time in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen, Palestine, Oman, Iran, Iraq, etc., if you're a woman, of the latter, death, would be by far the more preferable of the two . . .

The Seventy-two Virgins . . . Heaven or Hell ?

2007-11-23T09:56:00.000-08:00

When, like Mohammed, you're inventing a new religion, one of the most difficult things is coming up with those snappy new gimmicks to attract followers. Unfortunately, Mohammed was living in the seventh century and was handicapped by the fact that T.V. and the Internet with all their high-tech bells and whistles hadn't been invented yet, so he was forced to fall back on pandering to basic human frailties like greed, lust, aggression and so on.

One day while he was enduring his annual bath, he, like Archimedes before him (who actually spent a lot of time in the suds), was struck by a magnificent inspiration, solving a problem of "hooking" new converts which had long perplexed him, and sprung excitedly from the tub with the Arabic equivalent of "Eureka" bursting from his lips, ran to his desk and jotted down the following note to himself;

"Any Mohammedan who commits suicide killing infidels will get seventy-two virgins in Paradise to do his bidding and fulfill his every whim and fantasy"

Now, at first glance, you have to admit that's a pretty effective proposition for a lot of pimply-faced young kids who keep getting shot down in the local singles bar by the hot chicks. Years of having drinks they've just bought for some babe who looks like a "Hooter's" centerfold poured down the front of their pants would tend to make make a lot of Mohammedan nerds begin to think seriously about those seventy-two virgins . . . and Mohammed knew this.

So far, so good . . . .

The only problem was that Mohammed never got around to thinking this thing all the way through.

Apparently, he got distracted while he was frolicking around in bed with his six-year-old wife Aisha ( if a fifty-four year old man can still actually "frolic" . . . ) and lost all his focus on this critical point of Islamic doctrine that has become so relevant in our time. His concentration wavered. His attention flagged. He neglected to work out the details.

And therein lies the problem . . . .

Let's take a look at this in a little more depth, shall we?

Here we have a 17-to-34 year old male Mohammedan, frustrated with life, strapped to the armpits with plastic explosives and ready to get his sweaty little hands on those seventy-two virgins. Out he goes into the street, climbs on a bus and . . .

K-A-A-BLOOIE ! ! !

He sets off the explosives and ascends to Paradise . . .

Again, so far, so good . . .

But now things begin to look a wee bit shaky. First of all, Allah never promised that these would be beautiful ( or, for that matter, even young . . . ) virgins. After they take off their veils, our freshly arrived martyr finds that Allah seems to have given him the wallflowers and bow-wows ( having kept the Jessica Simpsons for himself ) and the young fool never thought to bargain for the best deal like he naturally would have for a pound of apples in the marketplace.

BIG lapse of judgement there on our boy's part !

Now, he's stuck with deflowering all these virgins. Let's be charitable and say that he can manage three a night, that'll take him 24 consecutive nights to finish the job.

And, Islam being what it is, and Allah being who HE is, the poor schmuck's going to have to marry all seventy-two of these now EX-virgins.

Let's think about that. Seventy-two wives. Seventy-two newlywed wives who are now going to have to wait another 24 days before they get any more sex . . . and this is on the honeymoon !

Most guys have trouble satisfying one woman at the best of times. Why would any man in his right mind take the chance of pissing off seventy-two women even if he could keep up the pace?

Not a lot of rational thought there . . .

And, now that he's got seventy-two already bitchy and disgruntled wives, he's bound by Islamic law to provide for each of them equally. Consider the implications of that. It means ponying up for seventy-two new washing machines, seventy-two new dishwashers, seventy-two new strings of pearls, seventy-two new dresses every week, and only Allah knows how many new pairs of shoes the poor cretin will have to fork out his hard earned dinars for.

Wait . . . hard earned dinars ??? When's this poor guy going to have a chance to go to work ??

Even if he did find time for a job, where's he going to find a convenience store in Paradise that'll pay him more than minimum wage? Since the vast majority of suicide bombers are young, unskilled and under-educated, the chances of his getting a mangement position in Paradise are slim to none. You'll probably have noticed by now that none of the leaders of the terrorist groups are out on the front lines blowing themselves to smithereens . . .

And by now, he's got seventy-two SERIOUSLY cranked-off wives at home, with each and every one getting meaner by the day since they're all pregnant as a result of his initial twenty-four day orgy after his "martyrdom".

Ah, seventy-two pregnant wives . . . and now we come to the eventual children.

Yes, children are truly a gift from Allah. A blessing, each and every one of them, for the Mohammedan father. Each and every one of the ten kids those seventy-two wives will each be popping out like candy from a Pez dispenser over the years.

What a wonderfully blissful family scene that conjures to mind. Seventy-two bitchy, screeching, complaining, sex-deprived wives screaming at the seven hundred and twenty kids tearing like little maniacs around the house.

And just think, now our heroic martyr gets to foot the bill for seven hundred and twenty new pairs of designer jeans every three or four months, all the orthodontist's bills, health insurance, school supplies, etc.

Makes your mouth water just imagining that kind of Paradise, doesn't it?

Now, there's one other aspect of this "Seventy-Two Virgins" doctrine of Islam that we haven't considered yet. Not all Islamic terrorists are single men. Some are actually married men with families who thought they'd get out from under the harrow by becoming martyrs and getting in on the seventy-two virgins thing. As we can see, that was sort of like "out of the frying pan into the fire". You really have to pity guys that stupid.

Also, I don't know if you're aware of it, but if a Mohammedan's married here in this life, commits suicide as a terrorist and goes to Paradise and gets his seventy-two virgins, when his wife dies she's still married to him and joins him in Paradise. Most people would think that that would be a pretty degrading position for her to be in, but, personally, I'll bet she'll just be lying on the sofa eating chocolates and laughing her ass off watching her hubby get everything he deserves for bailing out on her and the kids.

For a woman, I think THAT'S true paradise!

It's curious, but neither the Koran or the Haditha mention the rewards awaiting the female suicide terrorists. I guess we can safely assume that they get new washer/dryers and a complete set of Tupperware.

Now, there's just one more point to cover here and we can do it quickly. There are those apologists for Islam who claim that the "seventy-two virgins" is really a mistranslation of the Koranic Arabic and that the true reading should be ( and this is a fact, I'm NOT making it up !) "seventy-two white raisins" !

Seventy-two white raisins . . . . ?!?

As far as I'm concerned, any fool that would blow himself up just to get his hands on "seventy-two white raisins" deserves more than any other individual on the face of God's green earth to have his or her DNA permanently flushed out of the human gene pool.

But that's Islam . . . . go figure . . . . !

Killing of non-muslims is legitimate (British Mullah)

2007-11-16T10:51:00.000-08:00

There have been legions of apologists for Islamic atrocities over the past seventy to eighty years, most of these coming from individuals or groups with deeply entrenched financial, political or ideological interests in the Arab world.

When the Arabs were rabidly voicing their determination to "push the Jews into the sea" prior to each of their failed attempts to destroy the Nation of Israel, there were those in the Western media who assured us that this wasn't to be taken literally, that it was just another example of the Arab culture's tendency for bombast and hyperbole in their speech.

When the Mohammedans began to extend their range of terror beyond the bounds of the Middle East, those same media sources hammered on the manta that "Islam is a religion of peace!" Even after the unparalleled demonstration on September 11, 2001 of Islam's naked ambitions to spread their tentacles of hatred and destruction to the very heart of American society, President George W. Bush declared to a stunned and still reeling American public that "Islam is a religion of peace!"

After the atrocities perpetrated in London on July 7, 2005 there were still those who declared that Islam was a "religion of peace" and that these acts of violence ( the B.B.C. still refused to characterize them as "acts of terror") were carried out by a small number of "extremists" who were "hijacking" a "peaceful religion".

In the video above, you can hear with your own ears the naked and unashamed statements of a prominent "British" Mohammedan unmasking the soul of this "peaceful religion" to the world. As a minor, but telling, point of interest, you might note that the interviewer in this B.B.C. production of "Hardtalk", while appearing to take a severly critical line with this cleric, never once uses the word "terror" in reference to the past and future Mohammedan atrocities to which he refers.

Apparently at the B.B.C. old habits die hard.

Another extremely intriguing pattern that seems to be emerging as we develop this blog is that the vast majority of Mohammedans who are actively and increasingly vocal in their condemnation of Islam and its barbarian doctrines are women. The interview conducted in the video above seems to typify more and more frequently the attitudes of Mohammedan men.

This in itself should give the governmental authorities in all civilized countries extremely sound and valid reasons to reassess their immigration policies.

I know that if the lives and safety of millions of citizens were entrusted to me, I would certainly prefer to err on the side of caution . . . . unless, of course, I was closely linked in some way to the financial benefits the PetroSheiks are so eager and able to provide to those willing to whitewash their barbarism.

Muslim "Honor" Killings

2007-10-30T17:11:00.001-07:00

"Honor" has different meanings in Islam . . .

The world is well aware of the barbarity of the concept of "honor killings" among the Mohammedans.

The preceeding video merely elaborates on the inhumanity of this doctrine, but it does not, it cannot, convey the sheer brutality and gut-wrenching inhumanity with which these lynching are carried out.

The idea behind "honor killings" is that a woman, no matter how young, is the sole vessel for the preservation of the "honor" of the Mohammedan's family and that any thought, act, or perceived act that might call the "honor" of the family into question requires the death of that woman, again, regardless of her youth.

There is really little to add that can further enforce or emphasize our condemation of this primitive and utterly barbaric doctrine.

What is truly interesting is that this "principle" of "family honor" is something which devolves solely upon the heads of the women in Islam; there is no such restriction placed upon men in Islamic society. As far as Islam is concerned, a man is free to behave in any way he pleases without fear of condemnation or punishment, as far as his responsibilities to maintaining the "family honor" are concerned. He is beyond the reach of any restraining social or religious doctrines.

And Mohammedan men make the most of this freedom.

Anyone who has visited a Mohammedan country has seen the packs of Mohammedan men trailing after a foreign female tourist like dogs scenting a steak. In all major tourist centers in the Islamic world, the single female tourist is hounded, sometimes with disarming courtesy, sometimes with blatant vulgarity, but always hounded wherever she goes. Whether it is in the souk or in the bazaar, a restaurant or a shop, there will always be the undercurrent of tension surrounding her, the knowledge that she is the prey and the Mohammedan men the predators.

These are the men who are willing, on the instant, to condemn and lynch their own mothers, sisters or daughters at the merest hint of an indiscretion or "perceived" indiscretion.

The hypocrisy of Islam defies comprehension by the civilized mind. These are barbaric practices that, even in earlier eras in less advanced cultures, were considered as unjust.

What would bring these atrocities to a screeching halt would be if Islamic women decided, in every Islamic society, to apply the same standards to, and inflict the same punishments on, the men in their families.

IF an erring son was seen talking to a Swedish tourist in Sharm-El Sheik, or a husband was caught with a woman not of his family in Doha, and they were shamed in public and subsequently lynched, I think that would go far to bring about a more civilized equality between the sexes in Mohammedan society. It wouldn't take more than two or three such examples to pull the rest in to line. I seriously doubt whether such public displays would be sanctioned by the male-dominated Islamic society, so the only reasonable alternative for the Mohammedan wife, sister or daughter would be to slit the offending male's throat in the night. Such an action would be well within the scope of any Mohammedan woman to perform without a second thought.

I think a week or so without sleep on the part of erring men would do wonders to rectify the situation.

But, given the mentality of the Mohammedan male, rather than surrender any of their "masculine prerogatives" of unfettered immorality, I think they would be more inclined to offer a bit more freedom to their women as a sop. I'm sure the Imams ( the Islamic clerics), tossing and turning restlessly in their beds at night, would find Koranic passages that would enable women to drive a car, work outside the home, visit freely among her friends, etc.

The threat of suffering the horrendous fate that the "men" in Islam have so easily meted out to women over the centuries would, I am sure, make them a little more civilized, if not less primitive.

"Yahoo" and "YouTube". . . Promoting Islamic Terror?

2007-10-27T03:22:00.000-07:00

There is an extremely disturbing pattern emerging on the "Yahoo.com" website as well as the "Yahoo Answers"section of the "Yahoo.com" website.

For those who aren't familiar with "Yahoo Answers", it's an adjunct of "Yahoo.com" where anyone with a "Yahoo.com" e-mail address can register, sign in and then ask or answer questions posted by other members. This is a free service and it has a host of different sections covering virtually every subject imaginable.

While most of the sections are pretty innocuous and not likely to raise the hackles of the average poster or answerer, there are a few subject areas that tend to attract rather more heated responses than others. Two of the most volatile forums are the "Israel" section as a sub-section under the "Travel" heading and "Religion and Spirituality" as a sub-section under the "Society and Culture" heading.

The questions posed by Mohammedans in both of these sections tend to be extremely provocative and antagonistic toward non-Mohammedans, especially Jews, Christains and Israel, while their responses to any questions or answers critical of Islam can frequently border on the hysterical.

Now, the problem is that while "Yahoo Answers" understandably has what are called "Community Guidelines" that are meant to act as mechanisms to keep offensive material out of this forum, and can result in the "suspension" ( read: "termination") of a user's entire "Yahoo" account if an unacceptable number of "violations" are reported, this policy is more and more clearly being used selectively to terminate the accounts of users who are critical of Islam.

As an example of this selectivity, the following innocuous question resulted in the termination of one user's account:

===================================================================

"Question: After three million years of evolution . . .?

. . . . and the long, slow climb of civilization from hunter-gatherers through the rise of agricultural societies and then the gradual emergence of science from the intellectual black hole of the Middle Ages, climbing still higher to witness the spark of the Industrial Revolution that led to the explosion of technolgical and scientific advances in the 19th, and 20th centuries which ultimately gave us the conquest of space and the computer age, do you really think the absolute height of human achievement, both technological and intellectual, on this planet is being able to ask, " Why does my cat pee in the bathroom sink?" on Y/A ?

I mean, really, WTF ?!?"

===================================================================

That, with no additions or omissions, is the entire question exactly as it was posted. Nothing there to offend anyone with a modicum of a sense of humor, I think? Just a light-hearted little bit of fun, wouldn't you agree? But it was posted by a user known to be critical of Islam on "Yahoo Answers" and, as such, was targeted and flagged by ONE Mohammedan user as offensive, resulting in the termination of that user's entire "Yahoo.com" account.

Other users have had questions or answers critical of Islam deleted and received violation notices BEFORE they were even posted on the site itself.

Questions about the validity of Islamic values and doctrines, or especially those critical of Islamic terrorism, are routinely deleted within half an hour to an hour after their posting.

But, postings by Mohammedans which are offensive in the extreme to Christianity or Judaism, or rabidly anti-Semitic when posted in the "Israel" section are left alone even when they have been known to have received over seventy-five flaggings for violations of the "Community Guidelines".

One such example was posted in the "Egypt" sub-section of the "Travel" heading a little while ago and remained posted for over FOUR DAYS without being deleted even though it had received over sixty flaggings that we were aware of ! !

This is the posting, showing the user's screen-name and the content of the posting exactly as it appeared on "Yahoo Answers":

====================================================================
Posted by "Magdoulin"
Member since: October 21, 2007

"but what did YOU do for Palestines or for anyone? tell me if you can hero.. I advise you, rather to criticise the Egyptian people, suggest something to do like demonstration for example if you are Egyptian or tell us about your experience of this matter. Let me now ask you a question: are you really ready to gift your soul for the Palestanian cause? for me I know the answer prematurely, people like you do nothing except complaining but in the serious time, they shut up. For me I am ready to carry out what you called the suicidal missions and what I called martyrdom duty and I am ready right now, do you know a struggleful cell which I can join to it?? by the way.. it is not joke!"

Posted: 4 days ago

====================================================================
This is a typical example of the type of language used by Mohammedan "Yahoo.com" users when discussing Israel, Jews, Zionism, etc. in the "Yahoo Answers" site.

And, as you can see, this was left untouched by the Yahoo moderators for over four days!

This, I believe I can safely say, was a blatant statement of terrorist intent and, by refusing to delete it, "Yahoo.com" implictly aided and abetted this individual's clear intention to influence others to commit similar acts of terror.

A disturbing example of "Yahoo.com"s collaberation with "YouTube" in censoring material critical of Islam or Arab states was the recent termination of the "Yahoo"e-mail account ( FYI: wa2el_3abbas@yahoo.com ) and "YouYube" account of a prominant and internationally respected Egyptian human rights activist, Wael Abbas, who had posted graphic videos of the torture of prisoners in Egyptian police custody on his website http://misrdigital.blogspirit.com/
It was only after an international uproar and expressions of outrage that both "Yahoo" and "YouTube" restored the deleted material.

While "Yahoo.com" has been willing, even eager, to act as a watchdog in the interests of its Mohammedan users, it has also been supine in the extreme in allowing offensive comments or postings regarding Christianity or Judaism by those same Mohammedans or, just as frequently, atheists who routinely disparage any and all religious faiths in the most offensive manners imaginable.

Luckily, in the "Yahoo Answers" community, the overwhelming impression one receives is that the vast majority of users realize this manipulation and continue to expose postings by Islamic apologists to the ridicule and contempt they so richly deserve.

I might suggest that the "Yahoo Answers" moderators keep in mind Abraham Lincoln and his justly famous statement that "You can fool all of the people some of the time, some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

Sexual Abuse of Children Authorized by Islamic Clerics

2007-10-26T12:52:00.000-07:00

This is a great example of the true nature of Islam.

With the cancer of Pedophilia sweeping the globe through the media of the Internet, there are more and more children being subjected to some of the most horrendous sexual abuses. This problem has been high-lighted in recent years with the revelations that Catholic clerics had been, for generations, abusing the children under their spiritual care.

In response to these revelations, the Catholic Church has instituted new regulations concerning the behaviour of celibate clergy when interacting with children in their parishes.

With the outrage of the Western world at these sexual atrocities and the almost visible cloud of shame that has overshadowed the Catholic Church, Mohammedan clerics have now come out, in an extremely vocal and agressive manner IN SUPPORT of sexual child abuse ! !

In a way, this is hardly surprising, since one of Mohammed's "wives" was barely six years old !

This is hardly anti-Mohammedan "propoganda", since the Mohammedan scriptures themselves state, "The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death)." (Sahih Bukhari 7.88)

I think that if you view the following video you'll have to agree that, in this age of rampant pedophilia, this kind of "religious" acceptance and encouragement of sexual abuse of children constitutes one of the most egregious and depraved doctrines that could possibly be imagined.

While the Catholic Church has admitted its shame and attempted to rectify its sins, the Mohammedans are revelling in these abominations.

Please watch the video, and let us know what you think through your comments.

Additionally, we suggest you visit www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/JenniferKing50718p2.htm

Regarding the practice of "thighing", the masterbating between the legs of a female infant or actually sodomizing her, Islamic clerics have this to say:

PEDOPHILIA LAWS FROM ISLAMIC-FATWA.NET

Question 1809

After the permanent committee for the scientific research and fatwahs (religious decrees) reviewed the question forwarded by the grand scholar of the committee with reference number 1809 issued on 3/5/1453 and 7/5/1421 (Islamic calendar)

Question: ‘It has become widespread these days, and especially during weddings, the habit of mufa’khathat of the children. (mufa’khathat - literally translated, it means “placing between the thighs” which means placing the male member between the thighs of a child).

What is the opinion of scholars, knowing full well that the prophet, the peace of Allah be upon him, also practiced the “thighing” of Aisha - the mother of believers - may Allah be pleased with her ?

Answer: After studying the issue, the committee has answered as follows:

As for the prophet, his thighing his fiancée Aisha when she was six years of age and not able to consummate the relationship was due to her small age. That is why the Prophet used to place his male member between her thighs and massage it, as the prophet had control of his male member not like other men.

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, The Supreme Leader of Iran, the Shia Grand Ayatollah, 1979-89 said in his official statements:

"A man can quench his sexual lusts with a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. Sodomizing the baby is halal (allowed by sharia). If the man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. It is better for a girl to marry when her menstruation starts, and at her husband's house rather than her father's home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven."

Khomeini, "Tahrirolvasyleh" fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990

“It is not illegal for an adult male to 'thigh' or enjoy a young girl who is still in the age of weaning; meaning to place his penis between her thighs, and to kiss her.”

Ayatu Allah Al Khumaini's "Tahrir Al wasila" p. 241, issue number 12

"Young boys or girls in full sexual effervescence are kept from getting married before they reach the legal age of majority. This is against the intention of divine laws. Why should the marriage of pubescent girls and boys be forbidden because they are still minors, when they are allowed to listen to the radio and to sexually arousing music?"

"The Little Green Book" "Sayings of the Ayatollah Khomeini", Bantam Books

MUHAMMAD, THE PROPHET OF ISLAM

PART 1 MECCA

An Arab is regarded as an old man, a sheik, when he is fifty.

Muhammad married Aisha when she was six years old in Mecca and she joined him in Medina three years later when he was 53. He began having sex with Aisha when she was nine years old and still playing with dolls.

This is the original story told by the ONLY valid biographers of Muhammad and Islam, Ibn Ishaq and Tabari, and the hadiths of Bukhari and Muslim. Refer also to the works of the Qur’an commentators Ibn Kathir and Ibn Qayyim. (Ibn Kathir, The Life of the Prophet Muhammad (Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya), Volume II, translated by professor Trevor Le Gassick, Garnet Publishing Limited, UK. The Center for Muslim Contribution to Civilization, 2000. pp. 93-94)
(Ibn Qayyim Al-Juaziyyah, Zad-ul Ma’ad fi Hadyi Khairi-l ‘Ibad (Provisions for the Hereafter, From the Guidance of Allah’s Best Worshipper) translated by Jalal Abualrub, [Madinah Publishers & Distributors, December 2000] Volume I, pp. 157-158)

Muhammad said that he had dreamed of Aisha before demanding her from her father, and his own brother in Islam, Abu Bakr, claiming special ‘prophets rights’ when Abu Bakr was reluctant to give her to him.

Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 235: Narrated 'Aisha: That the Prophet said to her, "You have been shown to me twice in my dreams. I saw you pictured on a piece of silk and someone said to me, 'This is your wife.' When I uncovered the picture, I saw that it was yours. I said, 'If this is from Allah, it will be done."

Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 18: Narrated 'Ursa: The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for 'Aisha's hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother!"

The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah's religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."

Marriage to a female already offered to another was illegal in Arab law. Abu Bakr had already arranged for Aisha to marry Djubayr Mutim.

Muhammad married ‘A’isha in Mecca when she was a child of six and lived with her in Medina when she was nine or ten. She was the only virgin that he married. Her father, Abu Bakr, married her to him and the apostle gave her four hundred dirhams. (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasulullah (The Life of Muhammad) translated by Alfred Guillaume [Oxford University Press, p. 792)
Tabari VII:7 “The Prophet married Aisha in Mecca three years before the Hijrah, after the death of Khadija. At the time she was six.”

Tabari IX:128 “When the Prophet married Aisha, she was very young and not yet ready for consummation.” [The History of Al-Tabari: The Foundation of the Community] translated by M.V. McDonald annotated by W. Montgomery Watt [State University of New York Press, Albany 1987], Volume VII, pp. 6-7) (The History of Al-Tabari: The Last Years of the Prophet, translated and annotated by Ismail K. Poonawala [State University of New York Press, Albany 1990], Volume IX, pp. 129-130)

Bukhari, Volume 5, Book 58, Number 236: Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.

An "Infidel" in Israel

2007-10-23T14:04:00.000-07:00

This article was published in The Jerusalem Post on October 23, 2007
The article was written by Lela Gilbert

Nonie Darwish was born in Cairo, and in the early 1950s moved with her family
to Egyptian-occupied Gaza, where her father, Lt.-Gen. Mustafa Hafez, was
appointed by president Gamal Abdel Nasser to command Egyptian army intelligence. Hafez founded Palestinian fedayeen units to launch terrorist raids across Israel's southern border. Between 1951 and 1956, the fedayeen killed some 400 Israelis. In July 1956, when Nonie was eight, her father became the IDF's first targeted assassination. He was immediately recognized as a shahid - a martyr for jihad. Nonie eventually graduated from the American University, and later worked as a journalist. In 1978 she moved to the US, where she has become a Christian.

Nonie Darwish's book "Now They Call Me Infidel" fascinated me, and I remember thinking as I read it that I would love to meet this woman. The opportunity came during her recent visit to Jerusalem to speak at the Feast of Tabernacles.

We began our conversation by talking about her family background.

You attended elementary school in Gaza. What was that like?

"In elementary school we learned hatred, vengeance and retaliation; peace was never an option, but a sign of defeat and weakness. Teachers filled our hearts with fear of Jews; that made hatred come easy and terrorism acceptable, even honorable. Looking back, I never heard a peace song in Arabic. All we heard were songs glorifying jihad, martyrdom and winning wars."

In "Now They Call Me Infidel", you wrote about the difficulties your mother faced as a widow, even though your father was an Egyptian hero. What was life like for you and your family after he died?

"After my father's death, my mother had to face life alone with five children in a culture that respects only families headed by a man. In the 1950s few women drove, and she was called names for buying a car to take us to school."
You've said that you gradually began to question the culture you lived in. Do any specific incidents come to mind that were turning points?

"I remember visiting a Christian friend in Cairo during the Friday prayers, and we both heard the verbal attacks on Christians and Jews from the loudspeakers. We heard "May God destroy the infidels and the Jews, the enemies of God…" and believe it or not, if you grow up with cursing prayers, they can sound and feel normal. But my Christian friend looked scared, and I was ashamed. That was when I first realized something was wrong with the way my religion was taught and practiced."
You are very outspoken in your book about the grave consequences of polygamy on women in the Arab culture. Why?

"Polygamy has a devastating effect on family dynamics, on the husband/wife relationship and on women's relationships with other women. Many Muslim men have only one wife, but the damage to the wife/husband relationship has already been done in the Muslim marriage contract, in which a man doesn't pledge loyalty to his wife. Besides the name of the bride, the marriage contract has three spaces left blank, to be filled with the names of any other women the man later wishes to marry. Yet in spite of this, a good Muslim woman must accept her destiny under Shari'a law..."
How would you describe Shari'a law?

"Under Islamic Shari'a law, punishments include flogging, stoning, beheading and amputation of limbs. These are cruel and unusual punishments by Western standards. Leaving Islam is punishable by death. Even if an Islamic state fails to kill an apostate, his death is guaranteed at the hands of a street mob. That makes Islam more than a religion; it's a state, with an elaborate legal system that can put you to death if you leave it. Shari'a guarantees that there is no crossing the "Berlin Wall" of the Muslim state... Amazingly, the majority of Muslim countries don't practice criminal Shari'a simply because they can't stomach it. But family Shari'a law is in every Muslim country. It allows only men the right to an easy divorce, permits up to four wives and allows wife beating. A woman is respected only when she hides her body, face and even her identity."

You've been to Israel several times. In your view, how does it differ from the rest of the Middle East?

"Israel really brings hope to the region. Israel is the only country in the Middle East that allows religious freedom. Even though it is the tiniest country in the region, it is not afraid to allow Muslims to have mosques to pray in; it is not afraid to allow Christians all these freedoms. It is really a credit to Judaism that it doesn't have the possessiveness Islam has. You know, it's amazing, with all the land the Muslims have, and all the wealth from oil, and all the armies, that no Arab country is secure in its existence. Why else would 1.2 billion Muslims feel threatened by five million Jews? It says a lot. And I've learned that the fear and hate are by design - of Islam's religious educators, its political leadership and its intellectuals. Hatred for Israel is part of how the Arab world operates. They need an enemy. Because there is so much turmoil inside the Muslim world and no one can really name the reason. Why do we have so much turmoil? Why do we have so much anger? Why do we have such rage in our families? They don't dare say it's because of Shari'a."

You still have family members in Egypt. When did you last see them, and what were your thoughts about life there during your visit?

"In August 2001 I visited my birthplace. I was stunned to see how radical Islam had taken over. The level of anger and hate speech was alarming. I saw extreme poverty, pollution, hazardous material and garbage along the Nile. There was high unemployment, inflation and widespread corruption. But when I read the Arab media, all I saw was the bashing of Israel and America. Citizens were unaware of Muslim-against-Muslim atrocities in Iraq, Algeria, Sudan and so forth. I was happy to return to the US on the evening of September 10, 2001."

So the next morning…?

"The next morning, when I saw the second plane hit the Twin Towers, I thought, 'Jihad has come to America.' Muhammad Atta was from Cairo, the same city I came from.

I called several friends in Cairo that day, but they were all in denial and asked me, "How dare you say that Arabs did this? Don't you know this is a Jewish conspiracy?"

Were the people you talked to affiliated with radical Islam?

"No, these were not radicals, but ordinary Egyptians, who are otherwise very nice people. I hung up and felt alone and disconnected from my culture of origin. Once again, my people are accusing the Jews of something we know very well that we Arabs have done... I started speaking after 9/11 out of respect for the 3,000 fellow Americans who died that day. I also spoke out of empathy for Israel - a country that deserves our respect and not our hatred. And today I speak out of love for my culture of origin, which is in desperate need of reformation. Arab terrorism is destroying the moral fabric and goodness in Arab culture."

You have written about the role envy plays in the Muslim world, describing it as a root of anti-American and anti-Israel thinking. Can you explain what you mean?

"As Muslims we fear the evil eye of others. We call it "hasad", which means envy. Unlike Christian teaching, which regards envy as a sin of the person who envies, in Islam envy is viewed as a curse brought upon one person by the evil eye of another. As a result we often see Muslims hide good news or keep their distance. Even giving a compliment is dangerous; it could be taken as a curse. The end result is a population that is extremely distrustful of one another...
Islamists are blinded by envy and can't understand Israel's success. They say it must be due to conspiracy and not merit... They have forgotten that Jewish success is due to a culture that promotes excellence and is blessed with self-discipline, education, dedication and a drive to leave this world a better place. There is no conspiracy there! If Arabs want to compete with Jews, let them do it in the realm of innovation and education, and not by terrorizing and eliminating the opposition. Arab mistakes are blamed on Israel, the West, past injustice or colonialism. Looking at a map of Israel in relationship to the Arab world tells us that Arabs don't need land; they need tolerance. There is no shortage of land. There is a shortage of freedom."

Exactly how do Muslim preachers stir up envy and hatred against non-Muslims?

"Non-Muslims are not just cursed, but are often described as "nagas", Arabic for "filth." The Times of London reported that Muslim students in Britain are being taught to despise non-Muslims as filth. That is why many Arabs believe that the existence of non-Muslims on Muslim land is a desecration... That is why America's defense of the Muslims against the Serbs, the Afghani Muslims against the Soviet Union, feeding Somali Muslims starved by their own leadership, received no credit in the Muslim world. In fact, the results are just the opposite; the more we try to help stabilize the region, the more we are despised. Muslims do not want to be rescued by infidels. This is a proud culture that is easily shamed by feelings of dependency on non-Muslims."

Besides your book, explain the other work you are doing.

"In February 2004, I started an organization called Arabs for Israel. Some criticized the name, claiming it implied a lack of support for Arabs. But to support Israel doesn't mean being anti-Arab. I love my people, but for peace to happen, we need a big leap, a new attitude; forgiveness and compassion. We Arabs need to ask "What can we do?" and not focus on what Israel must do to build trust, respect and peace... Improving living conditions for Arabs is not Israel's responsibility, it is the Arabs' responsibility. And Arab kids don't need hatred, they need hope. They don't need jihad, they need jobs."

What are your fears for Israel?

"My greatest fear for Israel is that it will lose the will to fight. Its founders are dying off, and now the same liberalism that is making the West weak is here too. I'm afraid Israel will give away too much, and the country will become too small to defend. Because the more you give, the more the Arabs want; it's part of the Arab culture. My Arab people are beautiful people, and I pray to God that they will find forgiveness in their hearts."

And "Amen" from the staff here on the blog!

Zionism as Opposed to Nazism / Islam

2007-10-04T23:27:00.000-07:00

There have been numerous attempts by the "tin-foil-hatted" Mohammedan anti-Semites to equate Zionism to Nazism.

The difference between these two types of movements is clear to the most jaundiced eye.

Zionism was, and is, a movement for the re-establishment of, and return to, a secure homeland for a people who were conquered and forcibly exiled by the Romans two thousand years ago and subsequently suffered unprecedented persecution and oppression at the hands of both the Christian and Islamic communities who were desperately attempting to distance themselves from the Judaic roots of their religions.

At no time have Jews charaterized themselves as "superior" to any other people.

The catch-phrase of all anti-Semites, "the chosen people", refers solely to the fact that the God of Israel ( I repeat . . . the God of ISRAEL) acknowledged that He had chosen Israel to be His people. There is NO reference in the Jewish scriptures DENYING the existance of other gods. There are, in fact numerous references to many different gods . . . it simply states that the nation of Israel, specifically, is forbidden to worship them or to have intimate relations with those who do.

If you believe in Ba'al, Woden, Allah, Mohammad, Shiva, Buddha, Jesus, Wicca, Zeus, etc., Judaism couldn't care less . . . more power to you.

But no dedicated Jew will follow those beliefs voluntarily.

Another extremely interesting similarity between Nazism and Islam is the rabid assertions that Jews invented democracy, communism, human rights, animals rights, etc. That these could be conceived as negative achievements shows the glaring differences between Judaism, which encourages intellectual and philosophical diversity and the Nazi/Islamic mentality which so virulently suppresses any such freedoms.

As for Jews inventing democracy, that refers to the Biblical commandment that, during the forty year experience in the desert, those following Moses were commanded to chose freely among themselves the leaders of groups of ten, then those group leaders would choose from among themselves leaders of hundreds, etc. until they reached the leaders of groups of ten thousand. When critical matters arose which couldn't be decided by these sub-leaders, they brought the problems to Moses for final adjudication.

That communism, a political philosophy formulated by Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels, was a reaction to the overwhelmingly inhumane conditions suffered by the average worker during the Industrial Revolution in England under the control of PROTESTANT industrialists is universially ignored by anti-Semites.

Both Nazism and Islam consider all these (democracy, communism, human rights, animal rights, etc.) to be abominations because they imply an innate dignity and respect for the individual.

Human rights are guaranteed in the Biblical scriptures for women, where there were no such guarantees previously, there are guarantees for the rights of slaves ( and the OBLIGATORY release of those slaves after seven years) where NO other people or nation gave such rights.

Animal rights and the requirement for the care and consideration of both domestic and wild animals are also an integral part of Judaism.

Another unique feature of Judaism, which is anathama to both Nazism and Islam, is its consistant REFUSAL to accept new members into the community unless they are absolutely and FREELY determined to become Jewish.

Contrast those few examples of Jewish religious tenents with both National Socialism and Islam.

Both National Socialism and Islam are based on the ideology of the superiority of a certain race or religious belief.

Both National Socialism and Islam are forces which demand submission or extermination.

Both National Socialism and Islam demand blind acceptance of, and submission to, a central leader. In the case of National Socialism it was Adolph Hitler, with Islam it is Mohammed.

Both National Socialism and Islam purport to be "superior" to all other peoples or religions.

Both National Socialism and Islam are monolithic belief systems which persecute and oppress those who they believe to be "inferior" to them.

The similarities between National Socialism and Islam are virtually endless, but the examples given above are enough to make my point.

If a Mohammedan Imam opposes the terrorism of Mohammedans, he risks his life in doing so, and Mohammedan clerics have been killed in Europe and elsewhere for voicing just such opinions.

NO rabbis have been murdered for any "tin-foil-hatted" anti-Semitic or "anti-Zionist" statements . . . they're just ignored by the rest of the Jewish community . . . and bound with hoops of steel to the bosoms of the anti-Semites who pounce on these pronouncements as gospel.

The very fact that you state that you can read a Neturai Karta rabbi comparing Zionism to Nazism or a Noam Chomsky denegrating Judaism itself shows the leeway Judaism has in the scope of the beliefs it encompasses.

For those who have this image of tiny Israel as a monstrous, overshadowing threat to civilization, I have just answer one question . . .

"How many hundreds of thousands of Muslims live in Israel, with passports they can freely use to leave that " Zionist" country if they so wish, and how many Jews live freely and safely in Gaza . . . or in Saudi Arabia ( or Iran, Iraq, UAE, Qatar, etc.)?

For reference, you might want to look at some of the following links, many written by ex-Mohammedans themselves:

http://www.camera.org/
http://www.islam-watch.org/exmuslims/
http://www.americancongressfortruth.com/
http://www.jpost.com/
http://www.honestreporting.com/
http://www.arabsforisrael.com/
http://www.memri.org/
http://www.memritv.org/
http://www.answering-islam.org/
http://news.spirithit.com/index/asia/mor...
http://www.faithfreedom.org/gallery/26.h...
http://smoothstone.blogspot.com/2004/08/...
http://middleeastfacts.com/yashiko......
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Truth or Consequences . . . .?

2007-08-30T01:38:00.000-07:00

Since we've been expanding the breadth and depth of our articles on Islam and its on-going threat to modern civilization, we've been getting excellent responses to our position . . . from both sides of the fence.

What we've found interesting is that the responses have taken on a pattern that's impossible to explain other than as a clear-cut conflict between good and evil.

Those who support our views, including both practicing and ex-Mohammedans, have condemned the examples of Islamic oppression and terror we have detailed and, along with the non-Mohammedans who read our blog, have concurred that Islam is today, indeed, an "unchained monster". This "monster", if left unopposed. will spread a far more deadly cancer of violence and barbarity than the Nazis of the Second World War could have ever imagined in their wildest dreams.

Those who oppose our views have uniformly ignored or, at best, minimized the continuing outrages of Islamic terror worldwide and have either riposted with hysterical rants about how Israel, the Jews, the U.S. the "Zionists', the West, the Christians, etc. are all responsible for the actions of the terrorists. More often, they have just stooped to slinging labels like "racist", "zionist", "hate-monger" and the like, rather than addressing the issues we've presented.

Islam is a religion that refuses to accept responsibility for its own actions.

While the world watches the daily beheadings, the bombings, the beatings, the rapes, the lynchings and other examples of Islamic "tolerance", the Mohammedans themselves seem to pride themselves on having a pathological condition of "blind-eye" to the most basic moral and ethical standards. They go on, endlessly, about how Islam is a "religion of peace and tolerance" while at the same justifying and applauding the atrocities commited by their co-religionists in the U.S., Britain, Canada, Israel, Turkey, Europe, South America, Indonesia, Egypt, Jordan and on and on.

The internecine slaughter between the Mohammedan communities in Gaza, Iraq, Lebanon, Indonesia, etc. today can't be blamed on the "Zionists", the "infidels", the "Great Satan" or any other outside influence.

These are Mohammedans slaughtering Mohammedans . . . period.

Just how blind or stupid they believe the rest of the world to be is anyone's guess, but the rising groundswell of global popular revulsion to Islam is due solely to the actions of the Mohammedans themselves.

That is not "racism", it's not "bigotry", it's not "Islamophobia" . . . it's simply a healthy universal moral revulsion toward the barbarism of Islam and its followers..

NO ONE ever "forced" a Mohammedan to become a terrorist. NO ONE ever "forced" a Mohammedan to slaughter the innocents in the name of Jihad. These are acts of their own choosing, their own free will and their own primitive culture.

Other people, other nations, other cultures have suffered far worse than the Mohammedans and overcome their oppressors without resorting to the atrocities that Mohammedans feel to be their unique right to commit.

The Jews suffered untold horrors at the hands of both Christians and Mohammedans for two thousand years . . . without raising a hand against their oppressors. Since the re-birth of the Nation of Israel, at the behest of a world shamed by the Nazis, they have defended themselves against the combined armies of the Islamic world and continue to be the ONLY nation on the face of the globe that actively and effectively combats Islamic terror.

As for opposing opinions, we welcome any rational, reasoned debate on our position, but when the epithet "racist" is used against us for our opinions expressed in this forum, we immediately know we've won the argument. As soon as the epithets begin to fly, the facts are being ignored.

And we base this forum on FACTS . . . not blind prejudice

There is no such thing as "the Islamic race". Islam is a religion embracing all races.

What we are standing up against is the spread of a violent religious movement that has ravaged the world for the past one hundred years. The violence is getting worse, the extremes to which Mohammedans will go are rapidly expanding and there is no doubt whatsoever that if Islam is left unopposed, the Western world will see itself destroyed from within by its own tolerance of the barbarians who have no tolerance for others.

In 1924, Adolph Hitler published his magnum opus, "Mein Kampf" and in it he detailed graphically exactly what he intended to do should he ever come into power. The world didn't take him seriously until it was far too late for the 40+million who died victims of, or in opposing, the Nazis.

The Quran was written 1400 years ago and it details as well exactly what the Mohammedans have in store for all non-Mohammedans should Islam gain ascendancy in this world. The daily evidence of this is there for all to see, even in a "politically correct" media that has bent over backwards to accommodate Mohammedan "sensitivities".

We have been criticized for using the term "Mohammedan" when referring to the followers of Islam, but we use that term purposely. In our book, if a Mohammedan is willing, even eager, to take the life of someone NOT OF HIS FAITH for drawing a cartoon of Mohammed, then Mohammed is no longer a man, but becomes a "God" to whom and through whom all prayers are directed and flow.

As one who worships Christ is called a "Christian", one who worships Buddha is a "Buddhist", so one who worships Mohammed is, logically, a "Mohammedan". There is no disapprobation attached to the term. It is simply a fact.

Jesus stands in the same relation to G-d that Mohammed holds with "Allah", but to my knowledge, NO ONE, Jew, Christian, Mohammedan or anyone else, has been slaughtered for portraying Jesus or any other Biblical figure either reverently or vulgarly.

That particular religious abberation is the unique province of the Mohammedans.

If you thought the death camps of the Nazis were an affront to humanity, wait till you see what Islam provides for the "infidels" around the world . . . if Islam is allowed to obtain supremecy.

But then, if you do see it . . . . it will be far too late for you.

There were those who resisted the Nazis and, in doing so, saved thousands of lives and shortened the war . . . thereby saving countless thousands of others.

But there were also those, like Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984), who wrote the poem "First They Came . . ." reminding us that silence makes one an accomplice of the terrorists

Original:

Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,habe ich geschwiegen;ich war ja kein Kommunist.
Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,habe ich geschwiegen;ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.
Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,habe ich nicht protestiert;ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.
Als sie mich holten,gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte.

Translation:

When the Nazis came for the communists,I remained silent;I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,I remained silent;I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,I did not speak out;I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for me,there was no one left to speak out.

It wouldn't take much editing to change "Nazis" to "Mohammedans" and that poem would be expressly applicable today.

"When the Mohammedans came . . ."

When the Mohammedans killed the Jews, I remained silent; I was not a Jew.
When they killed the Buddhists, I remained silent; I was not a Buddhist.
When they killed the Hindus, I did not speak out; I was not a Hindu.
When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.

So, are you going to submit . . . or resist?

The choice is yours . . . .

And a special "Yasser" Award goes to . . . .

2007-08-28T12:59:00.000-07:00

Christiane Amanpour
(born: January 12, 1958 - died: ?)

Our newest recipient of the coveted "Yasser" Award for Yellow Journalism and a hearty "Hearst" handshake . . . . !

There are certain times in one's life where one just has to admit one's mistakes and try to correct them.

This is one of those times.

In an earlier posting (see "Pallywood" ) we bestowed the coveted "Yasser" Award for Yellow Journalism on the Reuters Wire Service for its coverage or, rather, non-coverage, of the Palestinian celebrations following 9/11 and the physical assault its field crew made on an AP news team in an attempt to stop the AP team from filming the riotous street festivities that might show the Palestinians in an unfavorable light.

We still stand by that award . . . credit where credit's due, we say . . . but after viewing Ms. Amanpour's magnificent performance as an apologist for Islamic terror in her program "G-d's Warriors" broadcast on C.N.N., we have to acknowledge her unrivalled virtuosity at distorting and warping the truth.

We certainly hope this doesn't adversely affect Ms. Amanpour's career since we do so enjoy handing out these awards. If her latest performance is anything to judge by, we'll be handing her quite a few more.

In the first segment of a three part program, Ms. Amanpour tackled "G-d's Jewish Warriors" as the equivalent of Islamic terrorists and we must say that with the little factual material she had to work with, she certainly spread herself on a grand scale.

In the course of the program, Ms. Amanpour focused on isolated incidents where Jews had attacked Arabs and stretched it out of all proportion to the extent that she made it seem as if these were daily incidents. What she didn't mention, of course, was that ALL Jewish attackers have been arrested, tried, convicted and jailed for their crimes.

Mohammedan terrorists? Irrelevant to Ms. Amanpour . . .

Ms. Amanpour went on to re-write history in an attempt to minimize the Jewish nation's claim to its holiest site, the Temple mount.

While Amanpour interviewed the Muslim Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who offered an Islamic perspective on the importance of the Temple Mount and Al Aqsa Mosque to Mohammedans, no Jewish religious figure was interviewed to discuss the unparalleled spiritual significance of the Temple Mount to Jews.

In a WorldNetDaily article, Aaron Klein states, "Amanpour's feature also claimed a visit to the Temple Mount by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2000 instigated the Palestinian intifada which began that year, even though multiple intifada planners and Palestinian leaders admitted the violence was pre-planned and that Sharon's visit was used as an excuse.

The intifada was launched after Arafat returned from U.S.-mediated peace talks at the Camp David presidential retreat during which the Palestinian leader turned down an Israeli offer of a state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and eastern sections of Jerusalem.

“Whoever thinks the Intifada broke out because of the despised Sharon’s visit to the Al-Aqsa Mosque is wrong…This Intifada was planned in advance, ever since President Arafat’s return from the Camp David negotiations,” admitted Palestinian Communications Minister Imad Al-Faluji to an Egyptian daily newspaper.

Arafat himself spoke of planning the intifada months before Sharon’s visit, as did Marwan Barghouti, a jailed Palestinian parliament member and one of the chief architects of the intifada.

Multiple senior terror leaders involved in intifada admitted during numerous WND interviews Sharon’s visit to the Mount did not spark the intifada."

But then, apparently, Ms. Amanpour knows more than the planners of the Intifada.

Ms. Amanpour's minimizing the tsunami of Islamic terror around the world while magnifying beyond all recognition the isolated incidents of Jewish extremism have become her trademark. Her contempt for the Jewish state and her blatant bias for Mohammedan perspectives in the Middle East have contributed in no small measure to the growing disaffection of viewers around the world for C.N.N. and its coverage of this region.

I would have to say that her piece de resistance in this program was her characterization of Islamic suicide bombers as "noble".

In her own words, "To the West, martyrdom has a really bad connotation (?!?) because of suicide bombers who call themselves martyrs," Amanpour stated. "Really, martyrdom is actually something that historically was quite noble, because it was about standing up and rejecting tyranny, rejecting injustice and rejecting oppression and, if necessary, dying for that."

So, we can assume that for Ms. Amanpour, a Mohammedan suicide bomber who slaughters tens of innocent people is "noble" while a Jew or Christian who resists or attempts by force to prevent such atrocities is a "terrorist".

What Ms. Amanpour has failed to grasp, what has failed to penetrate the solid ivory between her ears is the fact that in the Judeo-Christian tradition "martyrdom" meant, and still means, being willing to give up your own life in the face of extreme persecution. It has NEVER meant taking the lives of tens of innocent people with you. That particular perversion is uniquely Islamic . . .

If old William Randolph was alive today, I believe he'd be on bended knee before this woman, hat in hand, awestruck by her total lack of morals or ethics. He really does pale into insignificance compared to her. And, knowing W.R. Hearst, that's definitely saying something.

As for her opinion on the responsibility of the media to be objective, she has publicly stated, "There are some situations one cannot be neutral about, because when you are neutral you are an accomplice." So . . . she pitches in on the side of the terrorists !

Bad grammer and syntax aside, that statement alone would qualify her for the "Yasser" Award which her collection at home so sorely lacks.

There's really so much to critique in Ms. Amanpour's presentation, I just don't have the time, the energy or the inclination to nit-pick her voluminous journalistic travesties.

But again, in closing, we certainly hope this incredible spectacle of Hearst-quality yellow journalism doesn't affect her future career . . . we can always use her material for more articles.

"Let the little children come to me . . ." - Jesus of Nazareth

2007-08-27T12:51:00.000-07:00

In the Christian Gospels, Mark 9: 35-37, Jesus is quoted as saying, "If anyone wants to become first, he must make himself last of all and servant of all." He then took a little child, set him in front of them (the disciples), put his arms around the boy, and said to them, "Anyone who welcomes one of these little children in my name, welcomes me; and anyone who welcomes me welcomes not me but the One Who sent me."

Jesus was an Orthodox Jew, fully imbued with all the love, compassion and faith in children that Judaism has held sacrosanct for thousands of years. When there is danger, the women and children are the first to be protected.

The children are the ones upon whom the Jews have lavished all their efforts to protect, educate, guide and comfort throughout the ages, even when the survival of the Jewish people endured its most perilous times.

In the darkest days of the reign of the Catholic Church and its burgeoning anti-Semitic theology, then, during the following centuries leading up to the horrors of the Holocaust, the Jews, against all odds, continued to love and educate their children in the Ways of the Lord and imbued in them a love of life, learning and a respect for the most basic moral and ethical social values of the civilized world.

For the Jewish people, education and a productive life in this world have been the cornerstones of their unprecedented achievements in art, science, literature, medicine, politics, etc.

The number of Jews who have achieved greatness and renown far exceed the ratio to their place in the world's population . . . and this is directly due to their love of their children and the Jewish people's love of learning.

Islam. on the other hand, with the single exception of the short-lived Cordovan Caliphate in Spain (circa 750 -1030 C.E . . . see previous posting) have focused on perpetrating violence, persecution and reveling in the oppression and slaughter of so-called "infidels".

The video we've provided above shows graphically how Islam has distorted, beyond all recognition, the tenets which Judaism, the faith Mohammed took as the cornerstone of his new cult, has held sacred for over 4000 years.

This Egyptian cleric is not alone in preaching the "glory of martyrdom" to Mohammedan children. This barbaric theology is being spread fervently world-wide in the madrasses by Islamic clerics and has the eager approval of the similarly indoctrinated parents of these children.

That a sermon such as this could be shown on a children's T.V. show in Egypt *LAST YEAR* is the clearest, most incontrovertible and stomach-turning example of why the West is now facing a culture of violence and death that makes the Nazis seem like saints in comparison.

When you watch this video, please keep in mind that this kind of spiritual, emotional and, ultimately, fatal abuse of Mohammedan children is being preached in mosques in the U.S, Canada, the U.K., South America, Asia and virtually every country in Europe to which Mohammedans have emigrated.

If you are interested in viewing countless other examples of the virulent rhetoric of Islamic violence and hate, I would refer you to the website: http://www.memritv.org/

Please remember that HAMAS, the governing power in Gaza, is now infecting the children of the territories with this kind of anti-Semitic venom and intolerance for all non-Mohammedans . . . and ask yourselves if these are the people for whom you feel true sympathy.

Islam . . . a religion of "peace" ?!?

Not in the mind of any sane individual on the face of G-d's green earth!

Islamic, and especially "Palestinian", --"Rule of Law" !

2007-08-27T04:33:00.000-07:00

Is this the justice

the Western apologists for a Palestinian State applaud?

This is Palestinian Jurisprudence

Images are fed from the website of Walid Shoebat Foundation

Deeyah . . . A Symbol of Strength and Self-Worth in a Sea of Islamic Hatred

2007-08-23T12:04:00.000-07:00

Deeyah (nee: Deepika Thathaal) was born to Sunni Muslim Pakistani and Afgan parents on August 7, 1977 in Oslo, Norway.

She is a singer, composer and human rights activist of Mohammedan Pakistani Pashtun heritage.

Deeyah's debut solo concert was as a 15 year old in Norway. She grew up with an innate sense of self-worth and, as her music career blossomed, she began to assert herself as a Mohammedan and as a woman. The first of these assertions was a result of her religious background, while the second was the result of her own strong and solidly founded faith in herself as an equal to any man in this world.

The music videos from her second album released in September 1995 caused an unprecedented outrage, and a violent backlash, in the Norwegian Mohammedan community which claimed Deeyah was an "evil" Mohammedan for displaying her uncovered back. She and her family were verbally threatened, physically harassed and, during a concert, she was attacked with pepper spray on stage by a "moderate" Mohammedan.

This last incident caused her to move to London in 1996 in hopes that she would be able to continue her career there in a more secure and freer creative environment.

But her past caught up with her once again.

The more her popularity in Britain grew, the more unpopular she became in some Mohammedan circles in the UK. The same controversy and problems hounded her in the UK as they did in Norway. Now, though, the threats against her escalated from verbal and physical abuse to death threats against both her and her family.

The "Muslim Council of Britain" asserted that death threats against Deeyah were faked or exaggerated simply to boost her popularity and public image.

Unfortunately for these terrorist apologists ( who were among the first to protest the innocence of "Livingstone's Lads", the Mohammedan terrorists of 7/7 in London), extensive and in-depth investigations by numerous journalists and music researchers proved these claims of threats to Deeyah to be "not only real but that the full extent of the intimidation against Deeyah has not yet been widely reported in the media."

The truth of this can be seen on several Mohammedan online forums and websites including the now-familiar violent Mohammedan messages and death threats posted about Deeyah on YouTube.

This is the naked face of Islamic intolerance from the victims' perspective.

This is the public and unashamed display of intolerance to the equality of women that has certainly become one of the "Five Pillars of Faith" of Islam.

This can be the fate of ANY woman who refuses to be vicimized by Islam.

Mohammedans have been claiming recently that the majority of new converts to Isalm are women ( claims ranging from 60% to 90% . . . ?!?). While those statistics are solely based on statements from Mohammedan apologists in the West, they pretty well bear out the famous quote (variously attributed) that ""There are three types of lies - lies, damn lies, and statistics."

As we are witnessing daily, the Mohhamedans' lies invariably fall into the third, and most egregious, category.

We offer our unconditional support for Deeyah in her struggle for personal and creative freedom.

We tender Deeyah our deepest respect and admiration for her strength and courage in the face of Islamic intolerance.

And, finally, we believe she should be ranked among the greatest of those, both men and women, who have, throughout the ages, given so much, faced such obstacles and persevered in their stuggles for independence and equality.

Pallywood Classics and the first "Yasser Awards" !

2007-08-21T05:34:00.001-07:00

And now, for those of our readers who have been looking for an alternative to the annual televised extravaganzas of Hollywood's Academy Awards, Britain's BAFTA Awards and the undeniably magnificent presentations of Bollywood's film awards for the best Indian and Asian films, we are proud to present . . . . the "Yasser"! This is the coveted Palestinian "Pallywood" cinematic award for the best acting, directing, make-up, special effects and overly emotive theatrics by Arabs in the "Palestinian Territories" for the eager ( and extremely undiscriminating ) consumption of foreign wire services around the world.

Since this is the first annual Palestinian "Pallywood Awards", coming to you directly from a safe hotel in Jerusalem, Israel, where all the best and highest paid foreign correspondents stay, we are admittedly going to be rather short on identifiable nominees for the different categories, BUT we are proud to bring you the first nominations for the foreign wire services most experienced and adept at staging and distorting news reports from "Palestine"!

The three leading nominees are . . . ( a breathless hush falls over the audience . . .):

1.) Reuters News Service ( . . . cheers and applause ! )

2.) Associated Press International ( . . . more cheers and applause ! !)

3.) Agence France-Presse ( . . . riotous whistling from the emotional French !)

While the judges are unanimous in their opinion that each of these three world-renowned wire services have contributed in their own unique ways to providing staged and outrageously distorted news coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the judges have decided that the award will go to . . . . REUTERS NEWS SERVICE !

THE AUDIENCE IS ON THEIR FEET, SCREAMING AND STAMPING THEIR APPROVAL !!!

Now, now . . . let's move on . . . quiet, there . . . thank you, thank you !

The reason why Reuters was awarded the coveted "Yasser" in the category of "Foreign Press Coverage" was due mainly to the incident following the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center when, while Palestinians were celebrating and dancing in the streets of Gaza and the West Bank, the local Reuters news team actually physically assaulted an Associated Press team filming the Palestinians to stop them from documenting behaviour which would undoubtedly reflect poorly on the Palestinian image abroad.

We have to offer our own "tip of the hat" to this Reuters team for its diligence in attempting to suppress any reporting detrimental to the Arab cause, as well as a "hearty Hearst handshake" to the Reuters organization for its staunch stand against independent and objective journalism!

Well done, we say !

(The fact that the AP European news chief decided not to televise the Palestinian celebrations in no way detracts from the Reuters news team's heroic efforts to surpress this event.)

As for the next annual "Pallywood Awards", we are hoping to pin down the Palestinian individuals and Palestinian organizations responsible for such magnificently staged sound and video news "bites" and are looking forward to giving them the kudos due them for a world-wide audience ! !

Thank you, thank you all . . . and good night from Jerusalem ( as if we'd stay in Gaza . . . ! ).

The B.B.C . . . Continuing to Aid and Abet Islamic Terrorism

2007-08-19T18:13:00.000-07:00

Although the B.B.C. has long been recognized as one of the principle Western media supporters of, and apologists for, international Islamic terror, its directors have apparently decided to pull out all the stops in their campaign to minimize or entirely ignore the atrocities being committed by Mohammedans worldwide, while censoring all negative references to Islam in their website, print media and electronic broadcasts.

Additionally, not only are they actively censoring negative comments regarding Islam, they are, as well, now actively promoting anti-Semitic and anti-Christian content even in the face of a deluge of complaints from these communities.

Recently, on one of their listener forums, they allowed such material as:

"Are you a christian? You do know that jesus had to hide all his short life he
lived in those promised land because his tribesmen used to call him fatherless,
ridiculed him for being a B-A-S-T-A-R-D...'

It was added: "Jesus...was also persecuted because the jews would never accept as their Messiah a person whose father was missing...' This comment was contributed by a listener calling himself "colonelartist", a regular and virulently anti-Semitic poster to B.B.C. forums.

The comments were not only allowed to remain for an entire week despite a deluge of complaints, but were subsequently given greater prominence in the forum itself.

They were only deleted following an enquiry from another British media source which questioned the B.B.C. regarding this posting.

The same contributor has also written: "The jews in much remembered concentration camps had even better quality of freedom that these palestinians have...'

One curious website user wanted to see if BBC editors were allowing these offensive remarks to remain while blocking others. He wrote: "No one can surpass the Muslims for denial of their role in Terrorism and Suicide bombing."

The remarks were immediately deleted.

The BBC has also been condemned for allowing virulently anti-Semitic posts from a contributor called "Iron Naz'. In a message left on the site for more than a month, Iron Naz wrote: "Zionism is a racist ideology where jews are given supremacy over all other races and faiths. This is found in the Talmud...which allows jews to lie as long as its to non-jews."

These blatantly anti-Semitic remarks brought justifiably outraged complaints from the Board of Deputies, the organisation that represents Britain's Jews.

However, the BBC said the remarks did not merit removal or censure. A spokesman said postings were removed only if they were considered likely to 'disrupt, provoke attack or offend others or are considered racist, homophobic, sexually explicit or otherwise objectionable'.

Obviously, the phrases " . . . offend others" and " . . . or otherwise objectionable." have, for the B.B.C., lent themselves to a far more lax and flexible interpretation than most civilized individuals in this post-Nazi era would endorse.

The Board of Deputies has stated that it will pursue its complaints against the B.B.C.. Mark Gardiner, of the Community Security Trust, stated: "The BBC obviously no longer recognises anti-Semitism. The BBC is a public body, funded by the British taxpayer. It has legal obligations."

What the B.B.C. itself considers those "legal obligations" to be is anyone's guess.

While the B.B.C.'s editorial policies have long been widely condemned for their blatant suppression of any unfavorable coverage of the Mohammedan community, the B.B.C. has, until recently, generally refrained from actively encouraging anti-Semitic and anti-Christian content.

Now, in the face of a growing Western groundswell of anti-Islamic reaction to the terrorist atrocities being committed daily by Mohammedans around the globe, the B.B.C. has clearly decided to take off the kid gloves and mount an aggressive counter-offensive by endorsing transparently pro-Neo-Nazi and anti-Christian submissions while suppressing any anti-Islamic comments.

It should be remembered that the B.B.C. refused to characterize the 7/7 London atrocities committed by "Livingstone's Lads" as "terrorist" acts, nor have they allowed ANY atrocities committed against Jews, and especially Israeli civilians, by Mohammedans to be described as "terrorist acts".

It has been the B.B.C.'s long-standing policy to refrain from using such terms as "Palestinian terrorists", "Islamic terrorists", "Arab terrorists" or "Muslim terrorists" in any of its reports dealing with atrocities committed by Mohammedans anywhere at any time.

Oddly, they have had no problem characterizing similar acts committed by relatively small and unknown groups such as the Greek organization "November 17", also known as the "N 17" group, as "terrorists" or having committed "terrorist acts". In its twenty year existance the
"N 17" organization killed a TOTAL of 80+ people, mainly politicians, military and diplomatic figures. The B.B.C. directly, and repeatedly, characterized "N 17" as "terrorists".

"Livingstone's Lads" murdered 53 British citizens in ONE DAY, but the B.B.C. categorically refused to describe them as "terrorists".

As per B.B.C. editorial policy, ALL Islamic terror organizations are exempt from such characterizations.

With such clear and transparent endorsements of Islamic terror by the B.B.C. as well as the widely publicised pro-terrorist, and subsequent vitriolic anti-Semitic, statements by the London mayor Ken Livingstone ( after whom the 7/7 terrorists were nicknamed "Livingstone's Lads" ) and, more recently, by the Liberal Democratic British politician Baroness Jenny Tonge, it is little wonder that London has become the new Mecca and base of European operations for Islamic terrorists.

As noted in a previous posting here, sources within the British intelligence and security services have unequivocally stated that the recent increase and frequency of "chatter" gleaned from known Mohammedan terrorists and their sympathizers in London and its environs have led them to believe that an attack or a series of coordinated attacks in the London area are expected to be attempted within the next two months.

In closing, we would remind our readers that the B.B.C. is funded in large measure by the British government and its editorial policies are therefore closely defined by Whitehall and the historically pro-Arabist policies of that institution.

"Livingstone's Lads" planning another attack?

2007-08-18T11:18:00.000-07:00

Security sources in the U.K. have indicated that according to a recent and significant increase in electronic "chatter" among known Islamic militants in London and its immediate environs, there is a distinct pattern emerging that strongly suggests that another attack similar to that of 7/7 is likely to be attempted in London within the next two months.

After the failure of the car bomb attack on the Glasgow Airport and the death of that terrorist strike's architect in hospital, the Mohammedan terrorists are now reportedly exploring less complex but more effective and deadly methods of operation. One of the options reportedly being considered is the importing of foreign Mohammedans to carry out these terrorist atrocities, since that would lessen the likelihood of their being traced back to local Mohammedan extremists.

After Ken Livingstone, the mayor of London, gave a red-carpet welcome to one of Islam's most vitriolic and virulently anti-Semitic clerics to the city some time ago, and, shortly afterwards, displayed a remarkable outburst of anti-Semitism by likening a Jewish journalist to a Nazi concentration guard, the Mohammedan extremist community has begun to gravitate to London in the well-founded belief that with "Red Ken" in the highest civic office, they will be under less stringent scrutiny than they would be elsewhere.

The attackers who, on 7/7, murdered 53 innocent Londoners became widely known as "Livingstone's Lads" in deference to the mayor's sympathy for their actions.

Following the atrocities, Mr. Livingstone reportedly at no time characterized them as "terrorist" attacks. Neither did he use phrases such as "Arab terror", "Muslim terrorists" or any similar characterization which could be understood as a criticism of either the acts themselves or the Mohammedan perpetrators.

To our knowledge, Mr. Livingstone not only failed to, but in a number of cases actually refused to, visit the victims of the atrocities, while advising the London public that the families of the terrorists should not be condemned or singled out for disapprobation.

Given Mr. Livingstone's widely reported and well documented sympathies for Mohammedan terrorists and his virulent contempt for Jews in general and Israel in particular, it is not surprising that the British authorities should be looking to London as the next site of a major terrorist attack.

Our informants in the British security services have suggested that the next attacks by "Livingstone's Lads" will most likely be random suicide attacks on "soft targets" such as supermarkets, football pitches, festive gatherings, and, especially, any well-attended public meetings in parks, plazas or squares where it will be more difficult for the security services to detect them. The use of police, paramedic, military, clerical or other such uniforms is unquestionably being considred since this tactic has worked so well in earlier attacks in Israel and more recently in Afghanistan and Iraq.

With the enthusiastic and unconditional support of such influential public figures as Mr. Livingstone and the Liberal Democrat politician Baroness Tonge, there is no doubt that they will use these endorsements to their advantage and the British public will be burying more victims of their politicians' craven policies.

It is, to this writer, incomprehensible that figures of such important political influence in Britain could openly and unabashedly aid and abet terrorists such as "Livingstone's Lads" or, as Baroness Tonge has done . . . again, lionize the Mohammedan terrorists in the Arab territories of Gaza and the West Bank without, at the very least, having charges of aiding and abetting terrorists leveled against them, let alone charges of treason.

UK Liberal Democrat Jenny Tonge Supports Islamic Terrorists . . .AGAIN!

2007-08-17T00:51:00.000-07:00

A British politician, the Liberal Democrat Jenny Tonge, recently gave her full and unconditional support for Palestinian terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. In a published news report, she blamed the Israeli government for all the ills of the Palestinians and even went so far as to label Israel an "apartheid" state.

This is a rather strange statement considering the fact that there are Arabs, both Mohammedan and Christian, living safely and comfortably in Israel, while Jews who stray into Palestinian areas are routinely murdered. It appears even more bizarre when looking at the composition of the Israeli military, which has among its ranks both Mohammedan Bedouin and Arab Druze as well as Israeli Arab Christians who have served proudly and with distinction in the IDF since 1948.

The fact that there is a vastly larger percentage of Mohammedans living in Israel than there are in Britain and that there are fewer restrictions on Arabs, whether Mohammedan or Christian, in Israel than there are in Britain she vehemently denied. She also seemed oddly unfazed by the fact that there have been more terrorist attacks by BRITISH Mohammedans against the British public than there have been by Israeli Mohammedan Arabs against Israeli civilians.

While Ms. Tonge has, in fact, never been to Israel, she was adamant in her condemnation of Israel in the strongest possible terms while not only condoning but encouraging the continued rocket attacks on Israeli civilians as well as suicide/homicide attacks worldwide.

In her interview, she also ascribed to the Israelis actions which had been clearly been committed by Hamas terrorists, such as the disruption of end-of-term examinations and the assaults on teachers and professors.

She said, "Even education is being destroyed as children are terrorized by raids on their schools," she said, claiming that the products of such a system would be "capable of very little except low-wage labor." That these raids in Nablus and Gaza were, in fact, carried out by Islamic Hamas members in opposition to co-educational classes in Palestinian schools and universities was apparently immaterial to her.

The evidence, and proof, of her unbridled anti-Semitism lies in the fact that Baroness Tonge was sacked as a member of Parliament and as the Liberal Democrat spokeswoman in 2004 after expressing support for Palestinian suicide bombers. At that time she stated that she herself would be willing to become a suicide bomber in order to kill Jews. It is worth noting that this sacking occurred in a Parliament not widely noted for its sympathetic views of Jews in general or Israel in particular.

While the English are noted for their tolerance of, and in many notable instances their affection for, the eccentrics in their midst, I think the Baroness's spectacularly public display of a serious mental instablity deserved to be dealt with more firmly than mere sacking from Parliament.

The disquieting aspect of this British politician's intentionally disingenuous statements is that it leaves one extremely worried not only about the future of British Jewry, but the safety and security of the British public at large if an individual of such influence can be bought so easily as a mouthpiece for Mohammedan terrorists who have already wreaked such havoc on that island.

When a British Baroness can openly and unashamedly espouse the cause of Islamic terror worldwide, suffering only a subsequent "slap on the wrist", I believe it is time for the British public to reassess its moral priorities . . . if not for this generation, at least for their childrens' sake.

And, as a perhaps admittedly juvenile Parthian shot, I might ask the Baroness about her position on the "apartheid" Irish terrritory currently occupied by the British government.

Occupied and oppressed for the past 400 years at the very least. I am myself a descendant of Irish forebears who fled the horrors of the famine or 1845 - 1849 which Baroness Tonge's peers did nothing to alleviate.

I believe the adage regarding "glass houses" is admirably applicable here . . .

Islam and the Nazi Analogy in Our Time

2007-08-16T10:06:00.000-07:00

Islam has, over the past seventy-five to one hundred years, evolved into a global social phenomenon that rivals the Nazi regime of 1924 - 1945 to such a remarkable degree that I think it deserves some comment and observations.

The only significant difference is that the German Nazi political phenomenon was initiated, propagated and relentlessly driven forward by the adamant will of a single individual, Adolph Hitler, while Islam, on the other hand, is a nebulous religious concept unsusceptible to conventional methods of attack against its adherents or defence by its victims.

What does stand out today is that there are strikingly similar steps being taken by individuals and movements both within and without Islam, as there were in Nazi Germany, who can be characterized as "resistance fighters" .

During the period of the Nazi regime, as it developed the blueprints for, and executed the steps to achieve its avowed goal of, world domination, there arose certain individuals who, for personal, moral and ethical reasons, could not condone or collaborate in the furthering of those goals.

Foremost among those who opposed Hitler's ambitions was the Wehrmacht officer Claus von Stauffenberg. Badly wounded in North Africa, Stauffenberg was a political conservative and a zealous German nationalist. He had at first welcomed the Nazi regime but had become rapidly disillusioned. He was at first appalled by the systematic and cold-blooded executions of Jewish civilians and the treatment of the Russian POWs. Then, beginning in 1942 he shared the widespread conviction among Army officers that Germany was being led to disaster and that Hitler must be removed from power. For some time his religious scruples had prevented him from coming to the conclusion that assassination was the way to achieve this.

Following the Battle of Stalingrad in December 1942, however, he came to the conclusion that not assassinating Hitler would be a greater moral evil.

On July 20, 1944, von Stauffenberg, in concert with his fellow collaborators, placed and detonated a bomb in the conference room where Hitler was holding court. By a mere chance of fate, the explosion was deflected by one of the massive oaken legs of the conference table and Hitler escaped serious injury.

While this particular attempt was unsuccessful, and the subsquent Gestapo reprisals took the lives of almost 5000 officers, members of their families and friends, it provided the inspiration and impetus for other Germans to follow and opened the gates for a growing flood of defections at all levels of the Nazi party.

It was a signal moment in the eventual downfall and defeat of the Nazis.

Today, there is a rising tide of revulsion among Mohammedans at the increasing barbarity being exhibited by their co-religionists around the globe. Mohammedans by the tens of thousands are turning to other, more civilized and truly spiritual faiths. Primary among the faiths to which these disillusioned Mohammedans are turning are Evangelical Christianity with its embrace of Israel and the Holy Land as the ancestral home of the Jews and, not surprisingly, with its history of pacifism in the face of aggression, Buddhism.

There are some shining stars of today's resistance to Islam's barbarism, one of which is a exceptional and outspoken ex-Mohammedan woman, Nonie Darwish, whose website can be viewed at http://www.arabsforisrael.com/ .

The daughter of an Egyptian officer who fell victim to the first Israeli targeted assassination, Nonie struggled with the personal, religious and political consequences of that action.

She worked as an editor and translator for the Middle East News Agency, until emigrating to the United States in 1978 with her husband, ultimately receiving United States citizenship. After arriving in the US, she began attending a non-denominational Evangelical church, eventually converting to the Christian faith.

She no longer practices Islam because she feels that even mosques in the US have a radical, anti-American and an anti-peace message.

About a year after the September 11, 2001 attacks, Darwish began writing columns critical of radical Islam.

Darwish's "Arabs for Israel" website describes itself as an organization of Arabs and Muslims who "respect and support the State of Israel", welcome a "peaceful and diverse Middle East", reject "suicide/homicide terrorism as a form of Jihad", and promote "constructive self-criticism and reform" in the Arab/Muslim world.

Palestinian native Kamal Nawash founder of "Free Muslim Coalition Against Terrorism" praises Darwish's work. For Mr. Nawash, Darwish's voice is an important one no matter who listens to it. "The Muslim community needs the controversy," he said. "For too long there has been a monopoly on who spoke for us."

That "monopoly" has been the terrorists and their apologists in the West.

The time has come for the Mohammedan "Resistance" to stand up and rally behind such moral and ethical luminaries as Mrs. Darwish and Mr. Nawash and raise their voices against the surging tide of Mohammedan barbarism of Islam in today's world before the conflict between civilization and barbarism reaches a critical mass where the resulting conflagration will make all previous wars pale in comparison.

Some exceptional sources for your reference:

1.) "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters, an impeccably researched and documented history detailing the origins of the present Arab/Israeli conflict. (available on Amazon.com)

2.) "Now They Call Me Infidel: Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel, and the War on Terror" by Nonie Darwish. Sentinel HC, 2006. ISBN 1595230319 ( available on Amazon.com )

3.) http://www.memri.org/ : English translations of Arabic publications in the Middle East and around the world.

4.) http://www.memritv.org/ : Videos taken directly from Arabic sources with English translations of their content.

5.) http://www.faithfreedom.org/ : The truth about Islam from those who have turned their backs on its barbarism.

6.) http://www.shoebat.com/ : Walid Shoebat is an American citizen, born to a Palestinian father and an American mother. He describes himself as a former member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation ( P.L.O. ) who took part in terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. He gained notoriety and admiration by becoming an ardent critic of Islam and supporter of Israel.

7.) http://www.freemuslims.org/ : "The Free Muslims Against Terrorism" organization is dedicated to the resistance against Islamofascism.

One further comment on the analogy of Islam and Nazism. After the Second World War ended, the French lionized their "resistance fighters" and, no matter what subject you might be engaged on, they would eventually work references to these "resistance fighters" into the conversation. They knew the names of many, they knew the fates of most and would proudly proclaim their parts in the downfall of the Germans. Unfortunately, the very fact that the French were so intimately acquainted with each and every one of these individuals shows how glaringly few there were among the entire French nation.

In contrast, if you ask the Danish who were their resistance fighters, they can confidently state, "We were ALL resistance fighters".

It is a telling aspect of the Danish experience that, after risking so much to save so many from the Nazi juggernaut, one of the first European victims of Mohammedan terror was a Danish filmaker, shot dead in the street, who had made a film denouncing the oppression of women in Islam.

Islam, like the Nazis, does not suffer unavenged criticism.

When the dust settles, and the Islamic terrorists have been defeated, I would vastly prefer to be remembered, like a Dane, among the unnamed and innumerable "resistance fighters" against Islam simply because it was my moral and ethical obligation as a human being.

That is the most precious legacy I can pass on to my children . . . the love of, and respect for, life, dignity, tolerance and self-respect.

The Tragedy of Islam . . . the Fall from Grace.

2007-08-10T03:03:00.000-07:00

In the face of daily, even hourly, reports of the continuing assault by Islam against civilized societies around the world, as well as the savage internecine conflicts being waged among Mohammedan communities themselves, one of the saddest aspects of this war is the Islamic apologists' attempts to justify the religion by pointing to the "Golden Age" of Islam in Spain during the time of the Cordovan Caliphate.

The Cordovan Caliphate ruled the Iberian Peninsula from approximately 750 - 1030 C.E. and did, indeed, with the usual fluctuations in political attitudes and practices, produce a relatively well-integrated and flourishing multi-cultural and multi-religious society that stood as a symbol of benevolent rule for nearly three centuries.

While there were the occasional persecutions and expulsions of Jews and Christians, on the whole, it can safely be described as the pinnacle of Islamic achievement in the realms of enlightened culture and government.

Unfortunately, this era of Islamic achievement ended almost one thousand years ago.

Since then, there has been no similar display of Islam as an intellectual, cultural, scientific or religious luminary among the nations of the world.

Living in the past is an illusory foundation for present actions. The atrocities and barbarities of Islam today cannot be blurred or justified by pointing to a long-gone era that has left only the whispering ghosts of its greatness behind.

As Mark Twain once remarked, when being shown the landmarks of a certain city, "They tell me it was a good hotel once, but that signifies nothing. I was a good boy once."

The saddest aspect of the Mohammedan's referring to the "Golden Age" of Islam during the Cordovan Caliphate as an example of Islam's potential is that, in doing so, he himself shows up the glaring contrast between the heights to which Islam might have aspired, and achieved, in the modern world and the actual barbarity and atavism displayed by Mohammedans across the globe today.

Given the gift of oil, the cornerstone of all modern societies, the Mohammedans have freely chosen to squander that priceless gift on the spreading of terror, violence, destruction and oppression rather than building schools, universities, hospitals, research institutes, etc. all of which, with the unlimited petro-dollar funds available for meeting any and all of their needs, could have brought the finest scientists, scholars, artists, writers, philosophers and educators to the Islamic world and Islam would have become the brightest beacon of civilization since the time of the Pharaohs.

Rather, Mohammedans have freely and, it seems, almost enthusiastically, chosen to become the most barbaric and intolerant of all cultures in the world today.

Their image and reputation in the world today is not the fault of the Israelis, the Jews, the Christians, the Americans, the "West", or any other outside source.

The reason for their "fall from Grace" lies within their own hearts . . . .

"From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters

2007-08-08T20:24:00.000-07:00

With the unprecedented plethora of books, articles, documentaries, magazines, news reports, blogs, websites, multimedia telecommunications coverage, etc. dealing with the Middle East conflict, one single book stands out like a shining lodestar of rationality and objectivity in the swirling maelstrom of controversy surrounding Israel's existence.

That book is "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters.

Ms. Peters began her investigation into the Arab-Israeli conflict as an avowed pro-Arabist, her only previous information on the situation coming from the superficial mass media reports, each of which had their own special interest influencing the perspective of that coverage. The vast majority, of course, being antithetical to Israel for political, economic and religious reasons at the time.

During the course of her research, Ms. Peters dug deeper in various Arab, Israeli, British and American government archives than any previous historian, personally interviewed many of the principals intimately involved in the shifting quicksands of Middle East politics, and did one of the most detailed and impeccably verified tasks of supporting each point presented in her book.

Ms. Peters needed to use no emotive or provocative terms to convey the importance and historical uniqueness of Israel's re-birth. Hers is, without a doubt, one of the most dispassionate and objective historical works ever written.

For Ms. Peters, the facts speak for themselves.

One telling anecdote regarding the reaction of the pro-Arabists and the Mohammedans to Ms. Peter's book was that a concerted campaign was launched shortly after the publication of this book to remove, by any means, all copies of her book from library shelves across the U.S, Canada and Britain.

You might check and see if there's one available in your local library . . .

If not, the book is easily available through Amazon.com

Propaganda crumbles in the face of the facts . . .

Ex-Muslims about Islam

2007-08-07T05:07:00.000-07:00

Tolerance and Respect?

2007-08-06T23:50:00.000-07:00

The Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem

Still a Center of Worship for all Mohammedans under the care and protection of the Jews of Israel.

As Opposed to:

The Bamiyan Statues of the Buddha had stood in Afghanistan for over 1500 years. These priceless works of religious art were one of the most beautiful and venerated examples of Buddhist spiritual creativity and an unparalleled physical and architectural achievement by any standard.

Nowhere else in the world was there an example of religious statuary on such a magnificent and breathtaking scale.

But, under the tolerance and mercy of the Mohammedans, they were turned into rubble.

An early and, unfortunately unheeded, wake-up call to the entire world as to the eventual fate of ALL non-Islamic holy sites if the dark shadow of Islam should envelop, unopposed, the rest of the civilized world. It is an especially revealing facet of this tragedy, rather this atrocity, that not one Islamic country, organization or individual among the oil-soaked Mohammedan world offered to aid in the restoration or recarving of these priceless religious artifacts.

In stark opposition to the naked hatred and intolerance shown to the Bamiyan Buddhas, stands the unprecedented care and respect the Jews of Israel have shown to the third holiest site in the Mohammedan world . . . the Al Aqsa Mosque . . . which stands on the site of both the First Temple, built by Solomon and the Second temple built by King Herod. The holiest sites in Jewish history and where the spirit of the G-d of Israel resided.

Even though those who now worship in this mosque are fanatically dedicated to the destruction if Israel, the Jews cannot, and will not, desecrate this house of the god of their enemies.

Israel, the World's "David" Against Mohammedanism's "Goliath"?

2007-08-06T21:25:00.000-07:00

In the face of a growing and increasingly violent world-wide onslaught of Mohammedan terror and internecine Islamic atrocities, is Israel to be forced to become the "Little David" to slay this Philistine "Goliath"?

Never forget, the capital city of the Philistines was Gaza!

In 1981, Israel successfully destroyed the Osiraq nuclear facility in Iraq. Had Israel not done so, the Allied troops who fought in the First Gulf war would have faced Saddam's tactical nuclear weapons and the outcome would have been vastly different and unquestionably far more costly in Allied troop and equipment losses. The overthrow of the Saddam regime would certainly not have been as easy or assured.

Now that Iran has achieved nuclear technology that will, despite their transparently disingenuous protestations, lead directly to the development of nuclear weaponry, must it fall once again on Israel to save the world from the imminent threat of Mohammedan attempts at world domination through nuclear destruction on a scale that will make Hiroshima and Nagasaki pale in comparison?

Iran's psychotic leader Ahmedinijad has openly threatened to "wipe Israel off the face of the earth."

Does any sane individual in the West truly believe that, once that objective has been accomplished WITH LITTLE OR NO WESTERN OPPOSITION, he and his megalomaniacal allies will stop there?

This is, remember, a RELIGIOUS war, and no religious warriors have EVER stopped their campaign to spread their "faith" until they were soundly and definitively defeated.

In our opinion, it would be far wiser, both politically and economically, for the Western world to form a grand alliance NOW and, in concert, lance the festering pustule of Mohammedan aspirations to world domination before the price in human life and the threat to the survival of Western civilization becomes too great.

Israel cannot be the eternal shield, alone, against this Goliath . . . and if, God forbid, she is indeed destroyed, then the West will as surely suffer her fate as night follows day.

Danish Cartoons

2007-08-06T04:46:00.001-07:00

Below are the cartoons published in Denmark's Jyllands-Posten. Click each image to enlarge.

Taken from http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=12146&offer=&hidebodyad=true

The cartoons above have been used by Mohammedans as a reason for murdering hundreds of innocent men, women and children around the world. They claim that any characterization of Mohammed is "an insult to Islam". The fact that Mohammedans routinely publish cartoons far more vicious and hateful concerning Jews, Christians and other faiths is, apparently acceptable to these murderous thugs.

If you visit http://www.memri.org/, the Middle East Media Research Institute, you will find in both printed and video form, a spewing of hatred for non-Mohammedans that hasn't been seen in the civilized world since the edicts of both the Catholic Church and Martin Luther's ravings in the Middle Ages. Even the Nazis, the apogee of anti-Semitism in our recent history, didn't extend themselves in such an unprecedented and unfettered way.

If Islam, and the 1.2 billion followers of this so-called "religion" are ready, at a moment's notice, to slaughter fellow human beings on the basis of a simple drawing, then there is no more to be said for their barbaric theology.

What has apparently so far escaped the notice of ALL commentators on this controversy is the fact that while Islam does, indeed, forbid the characterization of "Allah" and Mohammed, this stricture applies SOLELY to those who worship Mohammed. Any Mohammedan who portrays either "Allah" or Mohammed can be fairly said to have invited the wrath of his co-religionists and brought down the results of his folly on his own head.

But NO non-Mohammedan is either under the restraint of this stricture or SUBJECT TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATING IT ! ! !

If we accept the rational of the Mohammedans, then the West, and particularly each and every Jew and Christian would have a perfect, and fully justified right, to slaughter any Mohammedan they found on the grounds that Islam routinely insults, slanders, demonizes and in every other way offends their religions on a daily, if not hourly basis.

Somewhere, sometime, the line has to be drawn in the sand to say, 'Enough is enough!". . . and, in our opinion, that time is now, and that place is here !

Here is a video related to the above cartoons:

What Does the Koran Say?

2007-08-03T20:55:00.000-07:00

Israel has survived the oppression and persecution of the Greeks, the Romans, the Catholic Church's cancerous theology, the Ottoman Empire, the Nazis, the English and will definitley outlast and overcome the barbarity of Islam.

The first law of any conflict is: "Know your enemy". In "Mein Kampf" Hitler laid out, in minute detail what he intended to do when he came into power. Over 30 million people, 6 million of whom were Jews, died because they didn't take his blueprint for world domination seriously.

It is an absolute necessity for every person who values freedom and tolerance to READ THE KORAN!

This is the Mohammedans' blueprint for exactly the same path to world domination as the Nazis. Each day brings us new and ever increasing reports of Islamic terrorism and oppression and their VERY serious threats to Western culture and values.

If you think Islam isn't serious, there are 1.2 billion Mohammedans who believe:

Sura 8:12 - I am with you; so support those who believed. I will strike terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved. You may strike them above the necks, and you may strike even every finger.

It even promotes terrorism in the Koran.

Sura 2:216 - Fighting is prescribed for you, and you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and that you love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.

Sura 3:151 - Soon shall we cast TERROR into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority.

Sura 3:151 speaks directly of killing ALL non-Mohammedans.

Sura 9:5 - Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the non-believers wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.

Surah 2: 98 – Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers.

Surah 2: 191-193 – KILL them [unbelievers] wherever you find them….Fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be ONLY FOR ALLAH.

Surah 3: 19 – Surely the true religion with Allah is Islam…and whoever disbelieves in the communications of Allah then surely Allah is quick in reckoning.

Surah 4: 104 – Be not weak in pursuit of the enemy.

Surah 5: 51 – “O you who believe! DO NOT TAKE THE JEWS AND THE CHRISTIANS FOR FRIENDS; they are friends of each other; and whosoever among you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.

Surah 8: 15-17 – “O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve marching for war, turn not your backs to them. Whoever shall turn his back to them on that day – unless he turn aside for the sake of fighting or withdraws to a company – then he, indeed, becomes deserving of Allah’s wrath, and his abode is hell… So you did not slay them, but it was Allah who slew them…that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is Hearing, Knowing.

Surah 9: 29 – Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth… until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a STATE OF SUBJECTION.

Surah 9:33 – “[Allah] it is who sent His Apostle with guidance and the religion of truth, that He might cause it to PREVAIL OVER ALL RELIGIONS, though polytheists may be averse.

===================================================================

Mohammedans should keep very, very quiet when talking about "peace" and being "peacemakers" . . .

Islam is, today, the most violent and barbaric religion on the planet and the fact that there has been no "Million Mohammedan March" to condemn terrorism speaks volumes in terms of the average Mohammedan's view of terror.

There is NO tolerance in Islam . . . when Mohammedans are in power.

Never forget . . . . . "KNOW YOUR ENEMY!"

READ THE KORAN ! ! ! . . . forewarned is forearmed !

Just another reminder of the "Monster Unchained !"

2007-08-02T07:44:00.000-07:00

This is the naked face of Islam . . . a religion born in the vast and arid deserts of the Middle East by a nomadic tribal chief whose entire world view was one of violence, oppression, deception and hate. In the video above you are witnessing the unashamed and incandescent hatred that the followers of this "religion" have for anyone who stands in their way of world domination.

Unlike the cancer of anti-Semitism which is based on the millenium-old lies, blood libels and propoganda of the Catholic Church, the ground swell of anti-Islamic sentiment sweeping the world today is based solidly on the reactions of moral and G-d fearing individuals around the planet to the terrorist atrocities we witness with our own eyes each and every day.

To even consider the idea of Islam as a "religion of peace" is obscene beyond belief and an insult to the memories of the victims, both past, present AND FUTURE, of this scourge of the world community.

G-d gave dominion over the wealth of the earth to the Christians, most notably the Catholic Church, for almost two thousand years and they squandered it on internecine wars and colonial adventures. Now that Church and its Protestant offspring are in tatters.

G-d has now given the Mohammedans the keys to the riches of this world in the form of oil, the cornerstone of progress for all modern societies. They have, over the past one hundred years used that unimaginable wealth to foster hatred, terror and oppression across every land they have conquered and are now turning their attention, and spreading their evil, to the West.

Watch this video and you will see what is in store for you . . . .

Israel . . . an Apartheid State?

2007-08-02T06:18:00.000-07:00

Oddly enough, the one place in the world where Jews, Christians and Mohammedans live in relative harmony is Israel.

Israeli Arabs (Mohammedans OR Christians) aren't fleeing Israel to get into the Palestinian territories, Israeli Christians are flourishing as never before and Christians from abroad are making pilgrimages in record numbers.

It's interesting that no Israeli Arab Mohammedans are committing terrorist acts like Mohammedans are in the States, Britain, Australia, Iraq (against even their own co-religionists), Europe, Asia, India, etc.

They are free to practice their religion without the restrictions that are being laid on Mohammedans in the U.S, Britain, etc. today. Mohammedan women can't drive or leave the house alone in Saudi Arabia, but they can in Israel. There are fewer "honor killings" in Israel among the Mohammedan community than in any other community of similar size.

If you're looking for internal "tolerance" and "peaceful co-existence", Israel's a pretty good example to follow. . . . That's one of the reasons why Israel's neighbours are so virulently opposed to her existence . . . it shows up their own intolerance so glaringly.

Simply look at the chaos and bloodshed in Gaza today . . . a Gaza without an Israeli presence. It's purely an internecine conflict between the Mohammedans themselves.

If you want to put things in perspective, if you want to condemn apartheid, just ask yourself how many Mohammedans live in Israel and how many Jews live in Mohammedan countries . . . like Saudi Arabia?

Does Israel have reserved roads where only Jews are allowed to travel?

2007-08-02T06:15:00.001-07:00

The only roads where "restrictions" apply are those bordering Arab Mohammedan villages from which both RPG (rocket propelled grenades) and small arms fire have consistently been directed at Israeli civilian traffic. That civilian traffic includes Arab Israeli and Palestinian workers trying to reach their jobs in Israel as well as Israeli civilians.Barriers have been erected between specific villages and the roads to eliminate these attacks.The government has setup check-posts to allow only those Palestinians and Israelis with legitimate permits to use these routes in order to reduce the incident of terrorist fatalities.

Why is there this bizarre myth that before Israel, Muslims preached 'tolerance' to Jews?

2007-08-02T06:11:00.000-07:00

Straight frrom the horse's mouth (so to speak . . .) as the Koran clearly and unequivocally states:Surah V: 51 – “O you who believe! DO NOT TAKE THE JEWS AND THE CHRISTIANS FOR FRIENDS; they are friends of each other; and whosoever among you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.” Islam . . . the religion that loves to hate.