Since we've been expanding the breadth and depth of our articles on Islam and its on-going threat to modern civilization, we've been getting excellent responses to our position . . . from both sides of the fence.
What we've found interesting is that the responses have taken on a pattern that's impossible to explain other than as a clear-cut conflict between good and evil.
Those who support our views, including both practicing and ex-Mohammedans, have condemned the examples of Islamic oppression and terror we have detailed and, along with the non-Mohammedans who read our blog, have concurred that Islam is today, indeed, an "unchained monster". This "monster", if left unopposed. will spread a far more deadly cancer of violence and barbarity than the Nazis of the Second World War could have ever imagined in their wildest dreams.
Those who oppose our views have uniformly ignored or, at best, minimized the continuing outrages of Islamic terror worldwide and have either riposted with hysterical rants about how Israel, the Jews, the U.S. the "Zionists', the West, the Christians, etc. are all responsible for the actions of the terrorists. More often, they have just stooped to slinging labels like "racist", "zionist", "hate-monger" and the like, rather than addressing the issues we've presented.
Islam is a religion that refuses to accept responsibility for its own actions.
While the world watches the daily beheadings, the bombings, the beatings, the rapes, the lynchings and other examples of Islamic "tolerance", the Mohammedans themselves seem to pride themselves on having a pathological condition of "blind-eye" to the most basic moral and ethical standards. They go on, endlessly, about how Islam is a "religion of peace and tolerance" while at the same justifying and applauding the atrocities commited by their co-religionists in the U.S., Britain, Canada, Israel, Turkey, Europe, South America, Indonesia, Egypt, Jordan and on and on.
The internecine slaughter between the Mohammedan communities in Gaza, Iraq, Lebanon, Indonesia, etc. today can't be blamed on the "Zionists", the "infidels", the "Great Satan" or any other outside influence.
These are Mohammedans slaughtering Mohammedans . . . period.
Just how blind or stupid they believe the rest of the world to be is anyone's guess, but the rising groundswell of global popular revulsion to Islam is due solely to the actions of the Mohammedans themselves.
That is not "racism", it's not "bigotry", it's not "Islamophobia" . . . it's simply a healthy universal moral revulsion toward the barbarism of Islam and its followers..
NO ONE ever "forced" a Mohammedan to become a terrorist. NO ONE ever "forced" a Mohammedan to slaughter the innocents in the name of Jihad. These are acts of their own choosing, their own free will and their own primitive culture.
Other people, other nations, other cultures have suffered far worse than the Mohammedans and overcome their oppressors without resorting to the atrocities that Mohammedans feel to be their unique right to commit.
The Jews suffered untold horrors at the hands of both Christians and Mohammedans for two thousand years . . . without raising a hand against their oppressors. Since the re-birth of the Nation of Israel, at the behest of a world shamed by the Nazis, they have defended themselves against the combined armies of the Islamic world and continue to be the ONLY nation on the face of the globe that actively and effectively combats Islamic terror.
As for opposing opinions, we welcome any rational, reasoned debate on our position, but when the epithet "racist" is used against us for our opinions expressed in this forum, we immediately know we've won the argument. As soon as the epithets begin to fly, the facts are being ignored.
And we base this forum on FACTS . . . not blind prejudice
There is no such thing as "the Islamic race". Islam is a religion embracing all races.
What we are standing up against is the spread of a violent religious movement that has ravaged the world for the past one hundred years. The violence is getting worse, the extremes to which Mohammedans will go are rapidly expanding and there is no doubt whatsoever that if Islam is left unopposed, the Western world will see itself destroyed from within by its own tolerance of the barbarians who have no tolerance for others.
In 1924, Adolph Hitler published his magnum opus, "Mein Kampf" and in it he detailed graphically exactly what he intended to do should he ever come into power. The world didn't take him seriously until it was far too late for the 40+million who died victims of, or in opposing, the Nazis.
The Quran was written 1400 years ago and it details as well exactly what the Mohammedans have in store for all non-Mohammedans should Islam gain ascendancy in this world. The daily evidence of this is there for all to see, even in a "politically correct" media that has bent over backwards to accommodate Mohammedan "sensitivities".
We have been criticized for using the term "Mohammedan" when referring to the followers of Islam, but we use that term purposely. In our book, if a Mohammedan is willing, even eager, to take the life of someone NOT OF HIS FAITH for drawing a cartoon of Mohammed, then Mohammed is no longer a man, but becomes a "God" to whom and through whom all prayers are directed and flow.
As one who worships Christ is called a "Christian", one who worships Buddha is a "Buddhist", so one who worships Mohammed is, logically, a "Mohammedan". There is no disapprobation attached to the term. It is simply a fact.
Jesus stands in the same relation to G-d that Mohammed holds with "Allah", but to my knowledge, NO ONE, Jew, Christian, Mohammedan or anyone else, has been slaughtered for portraying Jesus or any other Biblical figure either reverently or vulgarly.
That particular religious abberation is the unique province of the Mohammedans.
If you thought the death camps of the Nazis were an affront to humanity, wait till you see what Islam provides for the "infidels" around the world . . . if Islam is allowed to obtain supremecy.
But then, if you do see it . . . . it will be far too late for you.
There were those who resisted the Nazis and, in doing so, saved thousands of lives and shortened the war . . . thereby saving countless thousands of others.
But there were also those, like Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984), who wrote the poem "First They Came . . ." reminding us that silence makes one an accomplice of the terrorists
Original:
Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,habe ich geschwiegen;ich war ja kein Kommunist.
Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,habe ich geschwiegen;ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.
Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,habe ich nicht protestiert;ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.
Als sie mich holten,gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte.
Translation:
When the Nazis came for the communists,I remained silent;I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,I remained silent;I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,I did not speak out;I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for me,there was no one left to speak out.
It wouldn't take much editing to change "Nazis" to "Mohammedans" and that poem would be expressly applicable today.
"When the Mohammedans came . . ."
When the Mohammedans killed the Jews, I remained silent; I was not a Jew.
When they killed the Buddhists, I remained silent; I was not a Buddhist.
When they killed the Hindus, I did not speak out; I was not a Hindu.
When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.
So, are you going to submit . . . or resist?
The choice is yours . . . .
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Tuesday, August 28, 2007
And a special "Yasser" Award goes to . . . .
Christiane Amanpour
(born: January 12, 1958 - died: ?)
Our newest recipient of the coveted "Yasser" Award for Yellow Journalism and a hearty "Hearst" handshake . . . . !
There are certain times in one's life where one just has to admit one's mistakes and try to correct them.
This is one of those times.
In an earlier posting (see "Pallywood" ) we bestowed the coveted "Yasser" Award for Yellow Journalism on the Reuters Wire Service for its coverage or, rather, non-coverage, of the Palestinian celebrations following 9/11 and the physical assault its field crew made on an AP news team in an attempt to stop the AP team from filming the riotous street festivities that might show the Palestinians in an unfavorable light.
We still stand by that award . . . credit where credit's due, we say . . . but after viewing Ms. Amanpour's magnificent performance as an apologist for Islamic terror in her program "G-d's Warriors" broadcast on C.N.N., we have to acknowledge her unrivalled virtuosity at distorting and warping the truth.
We certainly hope this doesn't adversely affect Ms. Amanpour's career since we do so enjoy handing out these awards. If her latest performance is anything to judge by, we'll be handing her quite a few more.
In the first segment of a three part program, Ms. Amanpour tackled "G-d's Jewish Warriors" as the equivalent of Islamic terrorists and we must say that with the little factual material she had to work with, she certainly spread herself on a grand scale.
In the course of the program, Ms. Amanpour focused on isolated incidents where Jews had attacked Arabs and stretched it out of all proportion to the extent that she made it seem as if these were daily incidents. What she didn't mention, of course, was that ALL Jewish attackers have been arrested, tried, convicted and jailed for their crimes.
Mohammedan terrorists? Irrelevant to Ms. Amanpour . . .
Ms. Amanpour went on to re-write history in an attempt to minimize the Jewish nation's claim to its holiest site, the Temple mount.
While Amanpour interviewed the Muslim Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who offered an Islamic perspective on the importance of the Temple Mount and Al Aqsa Mosque to Mohammedans, no Jewish religious figure was interviewed to discuss the unparalleled spiritual significance of the Temple Mount to Jews.
In a WorldNetDaily article, Aaron Klein states, "Amanpour's feature also claimed a visit to the Temple Mount by former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2000 instigated the Palestinian intifada which began that year, even though multiple intifada planners and Palestinian leaders admitted the violence was pre-planned and that Sharon's visit was used as an excuse.
The intifada was launched after Arafat returned from U.S.-mediated peace talks at the Camp David presidential retreat during which the Palestinian leader turned down an Israeli offer of a state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and eastern sections of Jerusalem.
“Whoever thinks the Intifada broke out because of the despised Sharon’s visit to the Al-Aqsa Mosque is wrong…This Intifada was planned in advance, ever since President Arafat’s return from the Camp David negotiations,” admitted Palestinian Communications Minister Imad Al-Faluji to an Egyptian daily newspaper.
Arafat himself spoke of planning the intifada months before Sharon’s visit, as did Marwan Barghouti, a jailed Palestinian parliament member and one of the chief architects of the intifada.
Multiple senior terror leaders involved in intifada admitted during numerous WND interviews Sharon’s visit to the Mount did not spark the intifada."
But then, apparently, Ms. Amanpour knows more than the planners of the Intifada.
Ms. Amanpour's minimizing the tsunami of Islamic terror around the world while magnifying beyond all recognition the isolated incidents of Jewish extremism have become her trademark. Her contempt for the Jewish state and her blatant bias for Mohammedan perspectives in the Middle East have contributed in no small measure to the growing disaffection of viewers around the world for C.N.N. and its coverage of this region.
I would have to say that her piece de resistance in this program was her characterization of Islamic suicide bombers as "noble".
In her own words, "To the West, martyrdom has a really bad connotation (?!?) because of suicide bombers who call themselves martyrs," Amanpour stated. "Really, martyrdom is actually something that historically was quite noble, because it was about standing up and rejecting tyranny, rejecting injustice and rejecting oppression and, if necessary, dying for that."
So, we can assume that for Ms. Amanpour, a Mohammedan suicide bomber who slaughters tens of innocent people is "noble" while a Jew or Christian who resists or attempts by force to prevent such atrocities is a "terrorist".
What Ms. Amanpour has failed to grasp, what has failed to penetrate the solid ivory between her ears is the fact that in the Judeo-Christian tradition "martyrdom" meant, and still means, being willing to give up your own life in the face of extreme persecution. It has NEVER meant taking the lives of tens of innocent people with you. That particular perversion is uniquely Islamic . . .
If old William Randolph was alive today, I believe he'd be on bended knee before this woman, hat in hand, awestruck by her total lack of morals or ethics. He really does pale into insignificance compared to her. And, knowing W.R. Hearst, that's definitely saying something.
As for her opinion on the responsibility of the media to be objective, she has publicly stated, "There are some situations one cannot be neutral about, because when you are neutral you are an accomplice." So . . . she pitches in on the side of the terrorists !
Bad grammer and syntax aside, that statement alone would qualify her for the "Yasser" Award which her collection at home so sorely lacks.
There's really so much to critique in Ms. Amanpour's presentation, I just don't have the time, the energy or the inclination to nit-pick her voluminous journalistic travesties.
But again, in closing, we certainly hope this incredible spectacle of Hearst-quality yellow journalism doesn't affect her future career . . . we can always use her material for more articles.
Monday, August 27, 2007
"Let the little children come to me . . ." - Jesus of Nazareth
In the Christian Gospels, Mark 9: 35-37, Jesus is quoted as saying, "If anyone wants to become first, he must make himself last of all and servant of all." He then took a little child, set him in front of them (the disciples), put his arms around the boy, and said to them, "Anyone who welcomes one of these little children in my name, welcomes me; and anyone who welcomes me welcomes not me but the One Who sent me."
Jesus was an Orthodox Jew, fully imbued with all the love, compassion and faith in children that Judaism has held sacrosanct for thousands of years. When there is danger, the women and children are the first to be protected.
The children are the ones upon whom the Jews have lavished all their efforts to protect, educate, guide and comfort throughout the ages, even when the survival of the Jewish people endured its most perilous times.
In the darkest days of the reign of the Catholic Church and its burgeoning anti-Semitic theology, then, during the following centuries leading up to the horrors of the Holocaust, the Jews, against all odds, continued to love and educate their children in the Ways of the Lord and imbued in them a love of life, learning and a respect for the most basic moral and ethical social values of the civilized world.
For the Jewish people, education and a productive life in this world have been the cornerstones of their unprecedented achievements in art, science, literature, medicine, politics, etc.
The number of Jews who have achieved greatness and renown far exceed the ratio to their place in the world's population . . . and this is directly due to their love of their children and the Jewish people's love of learning.
Islam. on the other hand, with the single exception of the short-lived Cordovan Caliphate in Spain (circa 750 -1030 C.E . . . see previous posting) have focused on perpetrating violence, persecution and reveling in the oppression and slaughter of so-called "infidels".
The video we've provided above shows graphically how Islam has distorted, beyond all recognition, the tenets which Judaism, the faith Mohammed took as the cornerstone of his new cult, has held sacred for over 4000 years.
This Egyptian cleric is not alone in preaching the "glory of martyrdom" to Mohammedan children. This barbaric theology is being spread fervently world-wide in the madrasses by Islamic clerics and has the eager approval of the similarly indoctrinated parents of these children.
That a sermon such as this could be shown on a children's T.V. show in Egypt *LAST YEAR* is the clearest, most incontrovertible and stomach-turning example of why the West is now facing a culture of violence and death that makes the Nazis seem like saints in comparison.
When you watch this video, please keep in mind that this kind of spiritual, emotional and, ultimately, fatal abuse of Mohammedan children is being preached in mosques in the U.S, Canada, the U.K., South America, Asia and virtually every country in Europe to which Mohammedans have emigrated.
If you are interested in viewing countless other examples of the virulent rhetoric of Islamic violence and hate, I would refer you to the website: http://www.memritv.org/
Please remember that HAMAS, the governing power in Gaza, is now infecting the children of the territories with this kind of anti-Semitic venom and intolerance for all non-Mohammedans . . . and ask yourselves if these are the people for whom you feel true sympathy.
Islam . . . a religion of "peace" ?!?
Not in the mind of any sane individual on the face of G-d's green earth!
Jesus was an Orthodox Jew, fully imbued with all the love, compassion and faith in children that Judaism has held sacrosanct for thousands of years. When there is danger, the women and children are the first to be protected.
The children are the ones upon whom the Jews have lavished all their efforts to protect, educate, guide and comfort throughout the ages, even when the survival of the Jewish people endured its most perilous times.
In the darkest days of the reign of the Catholic Church and its burgeoning anti-Semitic theology, then, during the following centuries leading up to the horrors of the Holocaust, the Jews, against all odds, continued to love and educate their children in the Ways of the Lord and imbued in them a love of life, learning and a respect for the most basic moral and ethical social values of the civilized world.
For the Jewish people, education and a productive life in this world have been the cornerstones of their unprecedented achievements in art, science, literature, medicine, politics, etc.
The number of Jews who have achieved greatness and renown far exceed the ratio to their place in the world's population . . . and this is directly due to their love of their children and the Jewish people's love of learning.
Islam. on the other hand, with the single exception of the short-lived Cordovan Caliphate in Spain (circa 750 -1030 C.E . . . see previous posting) have focused on perpetrating violence, persecution and reveling in the oppression and slaughter of so-called "infidels".
The video we've provided above shows graphically how Islam has distorted, beyond all recognition, the tenets which Judaism, the faith Mohammed took as the cornerstone of his new cult, has held sacred for over 4000 years.
This Egyptian cleric is not alone in preaching the "glory of martyrdom" to Mohammedan children. This barbaric theology is being spread fervently world-wide in the madrasses by Islamic clerics and has the eager approval of the similarly indoctrinated parents of these children.
That a sermon such as this could be shown on a children's T.V. show in Egypt *LAST YEAR* is the clearest, most incontrovertible and stomach-turning example of why the West is now facing a culture of violence and death that makes the Nazis seem like saints in comparison.
When you watch this video, please keep in mind that this kind of spiritual, emotional and, ultimately, fatal abuse of Mohammedan children is being preached in mosques in the U.S, Canada, the U.K., South America, Asia and virtually every country in Europe to which Mohammedans have emigrated.
If you are interested in viewing countless other examples of the virulent rhetoric of Islamic violence and hate, I would refer you to the website: http://www.memritv.org/
Please remember that HAMAS, the governing power in Gaza, is now infecting the children of the territories with this kind of anti-Semitic venom and intolerance for all non-Mohammedans . . . and ask yourselves if these are the people for whom you feel true sympathy.
Islam . . . a religion of "peace" ?!?
Not in the mind of any sane individual on the face of G-d's green earth!
Islamic, and especially "Palestinian", --"Rule of Law" !
Is this the justice
the Western apologists for a Palestinian State applaud?
This is Palestinian Jurisprudence
Images are fed from the website of Walid Shoebat Foundation
Thursday, August 23, 2007
Deeyah . . . A Symbol of Strength and Self-Worth in a Sea of Islamic Hatred
Deeyah (nee: Deepika Thathaal) was born to Sunni Muslim Pakistani and Afgan parents on August 7, 1977 in Oslo, Norway.
She is a singer, composer and human rights activist of Mohammedan Pakistani Pashtun heritage.
Deeyah's debut solo concert was as a 15 year old in Norway. She grew up with an innate sense of self-worth and, as her music career blossomed, she began to assert herself as a Mohammedan and as a woman. The first of these assertions was a result of her religious background, while the second was the result of her own strong and solidly founded faith in herself as an equal to any man in this world.
The music videos from her second album released in September 1995 caused an unprecedented outrage, and a violent backlash, in the Norwegian Mohammedan community which claimed Deeyah was an "evil" Mohammedan for displaying her uncovered back. She and her family were verbally threatened, physically harassed and, during a concert, she was attacked with pepper spray on stage by a "moderate" Mohammedan.
This last incident caused her to move to London in 1996 in hopes that she would be able to continue her career there in a more secure and freer creative environment.
But her past caught up with her once again.
The more her popularity in Britain grew, the more unpopular she became in some Mohammedan circles in the UK. The same controversy and problems hounded her in the UK as they did in Norway. Now, though, the threats against her escalated from verbal and physical abuse to death threats against both her and her family.
The "Muslim Council of Britain" asserted that death threats against Deeyah were faked or exaggerated simply to boost her popularity and public image.
Unfortunately for these terrorist apologists ( who were among the first to protest the innocence of "Livingstone's Lads", the Mohammedan terrorists of 7/7 in London), extensive and in-depth investigations by numerous journalists and music researchers proved these claims of threats to Deeyah to be "not only real but that the full extent of the intimidation against Deeyah has not yet been widely reported in the media."
The truth of this can be seen on several Mohammedan online forums and websites including the now-familiar violent Mohammedan messages and death threats posted about Deeyah on YouTube.
This is the naked face of Islamic intolerance from the victims' perspective.
This is the public and unashamed display of intolerance to the equality of women that has certainly become one of the "Five Pillars of Faith" of Islam.
This can be the fate of ANY woman who refuses to be vicimized by Islam.
Mohammedans have been claiming recently that the majority of new converts to Isalm are women ( claims ranging from 60% to 90% . . . ?!?). While those statistics are solely based on statements from Mohammedan apologists in the West, they pretty well bear out the famous quote (variously attributed) that ""There are three types of lies - lies, damn lies, and statistics."
As we are witnessing daily, the Mohhamedans' lies invariably fall into the third, and most egregious, category.
We offer our unconditional support for Deeyah in her struggle for personal and creative freedom.
We tender Deeyah our deepest respect and admiration for her strength and courage in the face of Islamic intolerance.
And, finally, we believe she should be ranked among the greatest of those, both men and women, who have, throughout the ages, given so much, faced such obstacles and persevered in their stuggles for independence and equality.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
Pallywood Classics and the first "Yasser Awards" !
And now, for those of our readers who have been looking for an alternative to the annual televised extravaganzas of Hollywood's Academy Awards, Britain's BAFTA Awards and the undeniably magnificent presentations of Bollywood's film awards for the best Indian and Asian films, we are proud to present . . . . the "Yasser"! This is the coveted Palestinian "Pallywood" cinematic award for the best acting, directing, make-up, special effects and overly emotive theatrics by Arabs in the "Palestinian Territories" for the eager ( and extremely undiscriminating ) consumption of foreign wire services around the world.
Since this is the first annual Palestinian "Pallywood Awards", coming to you directly from a safe hotel in Jerusalem, Israel, where all the best and highest paid foreign correspondents stay, we are admittedly going to be rather short on identifiable nominees for the different categories, BUT we are proud to bring you the first nominations for the foreign wire services most experienced and adept at staging and distorting news reports from "Palestine"!
The three leading nominees are . . . ( a breathless hush falls over the audience . . .):
1.) Reuters News Service ( . . . cheers and applause ! )
2.) Associated Press International ( . . . more cheers and applause ! !)
3.) Agence France-Presse ( . . . riotous whistling from the emotional French !)
While the judges are unanimous in their opinion that each of these three world-renowned wire services have contributed in their own unique ways to providing staged and outrageously distorted news coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict, the judges have decided that the award will go to . . . . REUTERS NEWS SERVICE !
THE AUDIENCE IS ON THEIR FEET, SCREAMING AND STAMPING THEIR APPROVAL !!!
Now, now . . . let's move on . . . quiet, there . . . thank you, thank you !
The reason why Reuters was awarded the coveted "Yasser" in the category of "Foreign Press Coverage" was due mainly to the incident following the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center when, while Palestinians were celebrating and dancing in the streets of Gaza and the West Bank, the local Reuters news team actually physically assaulted an Associated Press team filming the Palestinians to stop them from documenting behaviour which would undoubtedly reflect poorly on the Palestinian image abroad.
We have to offer our own "tip of the hat" to this Reuters team for its diligence in attempting to suppress any reporting detrimental to the Arab cause, as well as a "hearty Hearst handshake" to the Reuters organization for its staunch stand against independent and objective journalism!
Well done, we say !
(The fact that the AP European news chief decided not to televise the Palestinian celebrations in no way detracts from the Reuters news team's heroic efforts to surpress this event.)
As for the next annual "Pallywood Awards", we are hoping to pin down the Palestinian individuals and Palestinian organizations responsible for such magnificently staged sound and video news "bites" and are looking forward to giving them the kudos due them for a world-wide audience ! !
Thank you, thank you all . . . and good night from Jerusalem ( as if we'd stay in Gaza . . . ! ).
Sunday, August 19, 2007
The B.B.C . . . Continuing to Aid and Abet Islamic Terrorism
Although the B.B.C. has long been recognized as one of the principle Western media supporters of, and apologists for, international Islamic terror, its directors have apparently decided to pull out all the stops in their campaign to minimize or entirely ignore the atrocities being committed by Mohammedans worldwide, while censoring all negative references to Islam in their website, print media and electronic broadcasts.
Additionally, not only are they actively censoring negative comments regarding Islam, they are, as well, now actively promoting anti-Semitic and anti-Christian content even in the face of a deluge of complaints from these communities.
Recently, on one of their listener forums, they allowed such material as:
"Are you a christian? You do know that jesus had to hide all his short life he
lived in those promised land because his tribesmen used to call him fatherless,
ridiculed him for being a B-A-S-T-A-R-D...'
It was added: "Jesus...was also persecuted because the jews would never accept as their Messiah a person whose father was missing...' This comment was contributed by a listener calling himself "colonelartist", a regular and virulently anti-Semitic poster to B.B.C. forums.
The comments were not only allowed to remain for an entire week despite a deluge of complaints, but were subsequently given greater prominence in the forum itself.
They were only deleted following an enquiry from another British media source which questioned the B.B.C. regarding this posting.
The same contributor has also written: "The jews in much remembered concentration camps had even better quality of freedom that these palestinians have...'
One curious website user wanted to see if BBC editors were allowing these offensive remarks to remain while blocking others. He wrote: "No one can surpass the Muslims for denial of their role in Terrorism and Suicide bombing."
The remarks were immediately deleted.
The BBC has also been condemned for allowing virulently anti-Semitic posts from a contributor called "Iron Naz'. In a message left on the site for more than a month, Iron Naz wrote: "Zionism is a racist ideology where jews are given supremacy over all other races and faiths. This is found in the Talmud...which allows jews to lie as long as its to non-jews."
These blatantly anti-Semitic remarks brought justifiably outraged complaints from the Board of Deputies, the organisation that represents Britain's Jews.
However, the BBC said the remarks did not merit removal or censure. A spokesman said postings were removed only if they were considered likely to 'disrupt, provoke attack or offend others or are considered racist, homophobic, sexually explicit or otherwise objectionable'.
Obviously, the phrases " . . . offend others" and " . . . or otherwise objectionable." have, for the B.B.C., lent themselves to a far more lax and flexible interpretation than most civilized individuals in this post-Nazi era would endorse.
The Board of Deputies has stated that it will pursue its complaints against the B.B.C.. Mark Gardiner, of the Community Security Trust, stated: "The BBC obviously no longer recognises anti-Semitism. The BBC is a public body, funded by the British taxpayer. It has legal obligations."
What the B.B.C. itself considers those "legal obligations" to be is anyone's guess.
While the B.B.C.'s editorial policies have long been widely condemned for their blatant suppression of any unfavorable coverage of the Mohammedan community, the B.B.C. has, until recently, generally refrained from actively encouraging anti-Semitic and anti-Christian content.
Now, in the face of a growing Western groundswell of anti-Islamic reaction to the terrorist atrocities being committed daily by Mohammedans around the globe, the B.B.C. has clearly decided to take off the kid gloves and mount an aggressive counter-offensive by endorsing transparently pro-Neo-Nazi and anti-Christian submissions while suppressing any anti-Islamic comments.
It should be remembered that the B.B.C. refused to characterize the 7/7 London atrocities committed by "Livingstone's Lads" as "terrorist" acts, nor have they allowed ANY atrocities committed against Jews, and especially Israeli civilians, by Mohammedans to be described as "terrorist acts".
It has been the B.B.C.'s long-standing policy to refrain from using such terms as "Palestinian terrorists", "Islamic terrorists", "Arab terrorists" or "Muslim terrorists" in any of its reports dealing with atrocities committed by Mohammedans anywhere at any time.
Oddly, they have had no problem characterizing similar acts committed by relatively small and unknown groups such as the Greek organization "November 17", also known as the "N 17" group, as "terrorists" or having committed "terrorist acts". In its twenty year existance the
"N 17" organization killed a TOTAL of 80+ people, mainly politicians, military and diplomatic figures. The B.B.C. directly, and repeatedly, characterized "N 17" as "terrorists".
"Livingstone's Lads" murdered 53 British citizens in ONE DAY, but the B.B.C. categorically refused to describe them as "terrorists".
As per B.B.C. editorial policy, ALL Islamic terror organizations are exempt from such characterizations.
With such clear and transparent endorsements of Islamic terror by the B.B.C. as well as the widely publicised pro-terrorist, and subsequent vitriolic anti-Semitic, statements by the London mayor Ken Livingstone ( after whom the 7/7 terrorists were nicknamed "Livingstone's Lads" ) and, more recently, by the Liberal Democratic British politician Baroness Jenny Tonge, it is little wonder that London has become the new Mecca and base of European operations for Islamic terrorists.
As noted in a previous posting here, sources within the British intelligence and security services have unequivocally stated that the recent increase and frequency of "chatter" gleaned from known Mohammedan terrorists and their sympathizers in London and its environs have led them to believe that an attack or a series of coordinated attacks in the London area are expected to be attempted within the next two months.
In closing, we would remind our readers that the B.B.C. is funded in large measure by the British government and its editorial policies are therefore closely defined by Whitehall and the historically pro-Arabist policies of that institution.
Additionally, not only are they actively censoring negative comments regarding Islam, they are, as well, now actively promoting anti-Semitic and anti-Christian content even in the face of a deluge of complaints from these communities.
Recently, on one of their listener forums, they allowed such material as:
"Are you a christian? You do know that jesus had to hide all his short life he
lived in those promised land because his tribesmen used to call him fatherless,
ridiculed him for being a B-A-S-T-A-R-D...'
It was added: "Jesus...was also persecuted because the jews would never accept as their Messiah a person whose father was missing...' This comment was contributed by a listener calling himself "colonelartist", a regular and virulently anti-Semitic poster to B.B.C. forums.
The comments were not only allowed to remain for an entire week despite a deluge of complaints, but were subsequently given greater prominence in the forum itself.
They were only deleted following an enquiry from another British media source which questioned the B.B.C. regarding this posting.
The same contributor has also written: "The jews in much remembered concentration camps had even better quality of freedom that these palestinians have...'
One curious website user wanted to see if BBC editors were allowing these offensive remarks to remain while blocking others. He wrote: "No one can surpass the Muslims for denial of their role in Terrorism and Suicide bombing."
The remarks were immediately deleted.
The BBC has also been condemned for allowing virulently anti-Semitic posts from a contributor called "Iron Naz'. In a message left on the site for more than a month, Iron Naz wrote: "Zionism is a racist ideology where jews are given supremacy over all other races and faiths. This is found in the Talmud...which allows jews to lie as long as its to non-jews."
These blatantly anti-Semitic remarks brought justifiably outraged complaints from the Board of Deputies, the organisation that represents Britain's Jews.
However, the BBC said the remarks did not merit removal or censure. A spokesman said postings were removed only if they were considered likely to 'disrupt, provoke attack or offend others or are considered racist, homophobic, sexually explicit or otherwise objectionable'.
Obviously, the phrases " . . . offend others" and " . . . or otherwise objectionable." have, for the B.B.C., lent themselves to a far more lax and flexible interpretation than most civilized individuals in this post-Nazi era would endorse.
The Board of Deputies has stated that it will pursue its complaints against the B.B.C.. Mark Gardiner, of the Community Security Trust, stated: "The BBC obviously no longer recognises anti-Semitism. The BBC is a public body, funded by the British taxpayer. It has legal obligations."
What the B.B.C. itself considers those "legal obligations" to be is anyone's guess.
While the B.B.C.'s editorial policies have long been widely condemned for their blatant suppression of any unfavorable coverage of the Mohammedan community, the B.B.C. has, until recently, generally refrained from actively encouraging anti-Semitic and anti-Christian content.
Now, in the face of a growing Western groundswell of anti-Islamic reaction to the terrorist atrocities being committed daily by Mohammedans around the globe, the B.B.C. has clearly decided to take off the kid gloves and mount an aggressive counter-offensive by endorsing transparently pro-Neo-Nazi and anti-Christian submissions while suppressing any anti-Islamic comments.
It should be remembered that the B.B.C. refused to characterize the 7/7 London atrocities committed by "Livingstone's Lads" as "terrorist" acts, nor have they allowed ANY atrocities committed against Jews, and especially Israeli civilians, by Mohammedans to be described as "terrorist acts".
It has been the B.B.C.'s long-standing policy to refrain from using such terms as "Palestinian terrorists", "Islamic terrorists", "Arab terrorists" or "Muslim terrorists" in any of its reports dealing with atrocities committed by Mohammedans anywhere at any time.
Oddly, they have had no problem characterizing similar acts committed by relatively small and unknown groups such as the Greek organization "November 17", also known as the "N 17" group, as "terrorists" or having committed "terrorist acts". In its twenty year existance the
"N 17" organization killed a TOTAL of 80+ people, mainly politicians, military and diplomatic figures. The B.B.C. directly, and repeatedly, characterized "N 17" as "terrorists".
"Livingstone's Lads" murdered 53 British citizens in ONE DAY, but the B.B.C. categorically refused to describe them as "terrorists".
As per B.B.C. editorial policy, ALL Islamic terror organizations are exempt from such characterizations.
With such clear and transparent endorsements of Islamic terror by the B.B.C. as well as the widely publicised pro-terrorist, and subsequent vitriolic anti-Semitic, statements by the London mayor Ken Livingstone ( after whom the 7/7 terrorists were nicknamed "Livingstone's Lads" ) and, more recently, by the Liberal Democratic British politician Baroness Jenny Tonge, it is little wonder that London has become the new Mecca and base of European operations for Islamic terrorists.
As noted in a previous posting here, sources within the British intelligence and security services have unequivocally stated that the recent increase and frequency of "chatter" gleaned from known Mohammedan terrorists and their sympathizers in London and its environs have led them to believe that an attack or a series of coordinated attacks in the London area are expected to be attempted within the next two months.
In closing, we would remind our readers that the B.B.C. is funded in large measure by the British government and its editorial policies are therefore closely defined by Whitehall and the historically pro-Arabist policies of that institution.
Saturday, August 18, 2007
"Livingstone's Lads" planning another attack?
Security sources in the U.K. have indicated that according to a recent and significant increase in electronic "chatter" among known Islamic militants in London and its immediate environs, there is a distinct pattern emerging that strongly suggests that another attack similar to that of 7/7 is likely to be attempted in London within the next two months.
After the failure of the car bomb attack on the Glasgow Airport and the death of that terrorist strike's architect in hospital, the Mohammedan terrorists are now reportedly exploring less complex but more effective and deadly methods of operation. One of the options reportedly being considered is the importing of foreign Mohammedans to carry out these terrorist atrocities, since that would lessen the likelihood of their being traced back to local Mohammedan extremists.
After Ken Livingstone, the mayor of London, gave a red-carpet welcome to one of Islam's most vitriolic and virulently anti-Semitic clerics to the city some time ago, and, shortly afterwards, displayed a remarkable outburst of anti-Semitism by likening a Jewish journalist to a Nazi concentration guard, the Mohammedan extremist community has begun to gravitate to London in the well-founded belief that with "Red Ken" in the highest civic office, they will be under less stringent scrutiny than they would be elsewhere.
The attackers who, on 7/7, murdered 53 innocent Londoners became widely known as "Livingstone's Lads" in deference to the mayor's sympathy for their actions.
Following the atrocities, Mr. Livingstone reportedly at no time characterized them as "terrorist" attacks. Neither did he use phrases such as "Arab terror", "Muslim terrorists" or any similar characterization which could be understood as a criticism of either the acts themselves or the Mohammedan perpetrators.
To our knowledge, Mr. Livingstone not only failed to, but in a number of cases actually refused to, visit the victims of the atrocities, while advising the London public that the families of the terrorists should not be condemned or singled out for disapprobation.
Given Mr. Livingstone's widely reported and well documented sympathies for Mohammedan terrorists and his virulent contempt for Jews in general and Israel in particular, it is not surprising that the British authorities should be looking to London as the next site of a major terrorist attack.
Our informants in the British security services have suggested that the next attacks by "Livingstone's Lads" will most likely be random suicide attacks on "soft targets" such as supermarkets, football pitches, festive gatherings, and, especially, any well-attended public meetings in parks, plazas or squares where it will be more difficult for the security services to detect them. The use of police, paramedic, military, clerical or other such uniforms is unquestionably being considred since this tactic has worked so well in earlier attacks in Israel and more recently in Afghanistan and Iraq.
With the enthusiastic and unconditional support of such influential public figures as Mr. Livingstone and the Liberal Democrat politician Baroness Tonge, there is no doubt that they will use these endorsements to their advantage and the British public will be burying more victims of their politicians' craven policies.
It is, to this writer, incomprehensible that figures of such important political influence in Britain could openly and unabashedly aid and abet terrorists such as "Livingstone's Lads" or, as Baroness Tonge has done . . . again, lionize the Mohammedan terrorists in the Arab territories of Gaza and the West Bank without, at the very least, having charges of aiding and abetting terrorists leveled against them, let alone charges of treason.
After the failure of the car bomb attack on the Glasgow Airport and the death of that terrorist strike's architect in hospital, the Mohammedan terrorists are now reportedly exploring less complex but more effective and deadly methods of operation. One of the options reportedly being considered is the importing of foreign Mohammedans to carry out these terrorist atrocities, since that would lessen the likelihood of their being traced back to local Mohammedan extremists.
After Ken Livingstone, the mayor of London, gave a red-carpet welcome to one of Islam's most vitriolic and virulently anti-Semitic clerics to the city some time ago, and, shortly afterwards, displayed a remarkable outburst of anti-Semitism by likening a Jewish journalist to a Nazi concentration guard, the Mohammedan extremist community has begun to gravitate to London in the well-founded belief that with "Red Ken" in the highest civic office, they will be under less stringent scrutiny than they would be elsewhere.
The attackers who, on 7/7, murdered 53 innocent Londoners became widely known as "Livingstone's Lads" in deference to the mayor's sympathy for their actions.
Following the atrocities, Mr. Livingstone reportedly at no time characterized them as "terrorist" attacks. Neither did he use phrases such as "Arab terror", "Muslim terrorists" or any similar characterization which could be understood as a criticism of either the acts themselves or the Mohammedan perpetrators.
To our knowledge, Mr. Livingstone not only failed to, but in a number of cases actually refused to, visit the victims of the atrocities, while advising the London public that the families of the terrorists should not be condemned or singled out for disapprobation.
Given Mr. Livingstone's widely reported and well documented sympathies for Mohammedan terrorists and his virulent contempt for Jews in general and Israel in particular, it is not surprising that the British authorities should be looking to London as the next site of a major terrorist attack.
Our informants in the British security services have suggested that the next attacks by "Livingstone's Lads" will most likely be random suicide attacks on "soft targets" such as supermarkets, football pitches, festive gatherings, and, especially, any well-attended public meetings in parks, plazas or squares where it will be more difficult for the security services to detect them. The use of police, paramedic, military, clerical or other such uniforms is unquestionably being considred since this tactic has worked so well in earlier attacks in Israel and more recently in Afghanistan and Iraq.
With the enthusiastic and unconditional support of such influential public figures as Mr. Livingstone and the Liberal Democrat politician Baroness Tonge, there is no doubt that they will use these endorsements to their advantage and the British public will be burying more victims of their politicians' craven policies.
It is, to this writer, incomprehensible that figures of such important political influence in Britain could openly and unabashedly aid and abet terrorists such as "Livingstone's Lads" or, as Baroness Tonge has done . . . again, lionize the Mohammedan terrorists in the Arab territories of Gaza and the West Bank without, at the very least, having charges of aiding and abetting terrorists leveled against them, let alone charges of treason.
Friday, August 17, 2007
UK Liberal Democrat Jenny Tonge Supports Islamic Terrorists . . .AGAIN!
A British politician, the Liberal Democrat Jenny Tonge, recently gave her full and unconditional support for Palestinian terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. In a published news report, she blamed the Israeli government for all the ills of the Palestinians and even went so far as to label Israel an "apartheid" state.
This is a rather strange statement considering the fact that there are Arabs, both Mohammedan and Christian, living safely and comfortably in Israel, while Jews who stray into Palestinian areas are routinely murdered. It appears even more bizarre when looking at the composition of the Israeli military, which has among its ranks both Mohammedan Bedouin and Arab Druze as well as Israeli Arab Christians who have served proudly and with distinction in the IDF since 1948.
The fact that there is a vastly larger percentage of Mohammedans living in Israel than there are in Britain and that there are fewer restrictions on Arabs, whether Mohammedan or Christian, in Israel than there are in Britain she vehemently denied. She also seemed oddly unfazed by the fact that there have been more terrorist attacks by BRITISH Mohammedans against the British public than there have been by Israeli Mohammedan Arabs against Israeli civilians.
While Ms. Tonge has, in fact, never been to Israel, she was adamant in her condemnation of Israel in the strongest possible terms while not only condoning but encouraging the continued rocket attacks on Israeli civilians as well as suicide/homicide attacks worldwide.
In her interview, she also ascribed to the Israelis actions which had been clearly been committed by Hamas terrorists, such as the disruption of end-of-term examinations and the assaults on teachers and professors.
She said, "Even education is being destroyed as children are terrorized by raids on their schools," she said, claiming that the products of such a system would be "capable of very little except low-wage labor." That these raids in Nablus and Gaza were, in fact, carried out by Islamic Hamas members in opposition to co-educational classes in Palestinian schools and universities was apparently immaterial to her.
The evidence, and proof, of her unbridled anti-Semitism lies in the fact that Baroness Tonge was sacked as a member of Parliament and as the Liberal Democrat spokeswoman in 2004 after expressing support for Palestinian suicide bombers. At that time she stated that she herself would be willing to become a suicide bomber in order to kill Jews. It is worth noting that this sacking occurred in a Parliament not widely noted for its sympathetic views of Jews in general or Israel in particular.
While the English are noted for their tolerance of, and in many notable instances their affection for, the eccentrics in their midst, I think the Baroness's spectacularly public display of a serious mental instablity deserved to be dealt with more firmly than mere sacking from Parliament.
The disquieting aspect of this British politician's intentionally disingenuous statements is that it leaves one extremely worried not only about the future of British Jewry, but the safety and security of the British public at large if an individual of such influence can be bought so easily as a mouthpiece for Mohammedan terrorists who have already wreaked such havoc on that island.
When a British Baroness can openly and unashamedly espouse the cause of Islamic terror worldwide, suffering only a subsequent "slap on the wrist", I believe it is time for the British public to reassess its moral priorities . . . if not for this generation, at least for their childrens' sake.
And, as a perhaps admittedly juvenile Parthian shot, I might ask the Baroness about her position on the "apartheid" Irish terrritory currently occupied by the British government.
Occupied and oppressed for the past 400 years at the very least. I am myself a descendant of Irish forebears who fled the horrors of the famine or 1845 - 1849 which Baroness Tonge's peers did nothing to alleviate.
I believe the adage regarding "glass houses" is admirably applicable here . . .
This is a rather strange statement considering the fact that there are Arabs, both Mohammedan and Christian, living safely and comfortably in Israel, while Jews who stray into Palestinian areas are routinely murdered. It appears even more bizarre when looking at the composition of the Israeli military, which has among its ranks both Mohammedan Bedouin and Arab Druze as well as Israeli Arab Christians who have served proudly and with distinction in the IDF since 1948.
The fact that there is a vastly larger percentage of Mohammedans living in Israel than there are in Britain and that there are fewer restrictions on Arabs, whether Mohammedan or Christian, in Israel than there are in Britain she vehemently denied. She also seemed oddly unfazed by the fact that there have been more terrorist attacks by BRITISH Mohammedans against the British public than there have been by Israeli Mohammedan Arabs against Israeli civilians.
While Ms. Tonge has, in fact, never been to Israel, she was adamant in her condemnation of Israel in the strongest possible terms while not only condoning but encouraging the continued rocket attacks on Israeli civilians as well as suicide/homicide attacks worldwide.
In her interview, she also ascribed to the Israelis actions which had been clearly been committed by Hamas terrorists, such as the disruption of end-of-term examinations and the assaults on teachers and professors.
She said, "Even education is being destroyed as children are terrorized by raids on their schools," she said, claiming that the products of such a system would be "capable of very little except low-wage labor." That these raids in Nablus and Gaza were, in fact, carried out by Islamic Hamas members in opposition to co-educational classes in Palestinian schools and universities was apparently immaterial to her.
The evidence, and proof, of her unbridled anti-Semitism lies in the fact that Baroness Tonge was sacked as a member of Parliament and as the Liberal Democrat spokeswoman in 2004 after expressing support for Palestinian suicide bombers. At that time she stated that she herself would be willing to become a suicide bomber in order to kill Jews. It is worth noting that this sacking occurred in a Parliament not widely noted for its sympathetic views of Jews in general or Israel in particular.
While the English are noted for their tolerance of, and in many notable instances their affection for, the eccentrics in their midst, I think the Baroness's spectacularly public display of a serious mental instablity deserved to be dealt with more firmly than mere sacking from Parliament.
The disquieting aspect of this British politician's intentionally disingenuous statements is that it leaves one extremely worried not only about the future of British Jewry, but the safety and security of the British public at large if an individual of such influence can be bought so easily as a mouthpiece for Mohammedan terrorists who have already wreaked such havoc on that island.
When a British Baroness can openly and unashamedly espouse the cause of Islamic terror worldwide, suffering only a subsequent "slap on the wrist", I believe it is time for the British public to reassess its moral priorities . . . if not for this generation, at least for their childrens' sake.
And, as a perhaps admittedly juvenile Parthian shot, I might ask the Baroness about her position on the "apartheid" Irish terrritory currently occupied by the British government.
Occupied and oppressed for the past 400 years at the very least. I am myself a descendant of Irish forebears who fled the horrors of the famine or 1845 - 1849 which Baroness Tonge's peers did nothing to alleviate.
I believe the adage regarding "glass houses" is admirably applicable here . . .
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Islam and the Nazi Analogy in Our Time
Islam has, over the past seventy-five to one hundred years, evolved into a global social phenomenon that rivals the Nazi regime of 1924 - 1945 to such a remarkable degree that I think it deserves some comment and observations.
The only significant difference is that the German Nazi political phenomenon was initiated, propagated and relentlessly driven forward by the adamant will of a single individual, Adolph Hitler, while Islam, on the other hand, is a nebulous religious concept unsusceptible to conventional methods of attack against its adherents or defence by its victims.
What does stand out today is that there are strikingly similar steps being taken by individuals and movements both within and without Islam, as there were in Nazi Germany, who can be characterized as "resistance fighters" .
During the period of the Nazi regime, as it developed the blueprints for, and executed the steps to achieve its avowed goal of, world domination, there arose certain individuals who, for personal, moral and ethical reasons, could not condone or collaborate in the furthering of those goals.
Foremost among those who opposed Hitler's ambitions was the Wehrmacht officer Claus von Stauffenberg. Badly wounded in North Africa, Stauffenberg was a political conservative and a zealous German nationalist. He had at first welcomed the Nazi regime but had become rapidly disillusioned. He was at first appalled by the systematic and cold-blooded executions of Jewish civilians and the treatment of the Russian POWs. Then, beginning in 1942 he shared the widespread conviction among Army officers that Germany was being led to disaster and that Hitler must be removed from power. For some time his religious scruples had prevented him from coming to the conclusion that assassination was the way to achieve this.
Following the Battle of Stalingrad in December 1942, however, he came to the conclusion that not assassinating Hitler would be a greater moral evil.
On July 20, 1944, von Stauffenberg, in concert with his fellow collaborators, placed and detonated a bomb in the conference room where Hitler was holding court. By a mere chance of fate, the explosion was deflected by one of the massive oaken legs of the conference table and Hitler escaped serious injury.
While this particular attempt was unsuccessful, and the subsquent Gestapo reprisals took the lives of almost 5000 officers, members of their families and friends, it provided the inspiration and impetus for other Germans to follow and opened the gates for a growing flood of defections at all levels of the Nazi party.
It was a signal moment in the eventual downfall and defeat of the Nazis.
Today, there is a rising tide of revulsion among Mohammedans at the increasing barbarity being exhibited by their co-religionists around the globe. Mohammedans by the tens of thousands are turning to other, more civilized and truly spiritual faiths. Primary among the faiths to which these disillusioned Mohammedans are turning are Evangelical Christianity with its embrace of Israel and the Holy Land as the ancestral home of the Jews and, not surprisingly, with its history of pacifism in the face of aggression, Buddhism.
There are some shining stars of today's resistance to Islam's barbarism, one of which is a exceptional and outspoken ex-Mohammedan woman, Nonie Darwish, whose website can be viewed at http://www.arabsforisrael.com/ .
The daughter of an Egyptian officer who fell victim to the first Israeli targeted assassination, Nonie struggled with the personal, religious and political consequences of that action.
She worked as an editor and translator for the Middle East News Agency, until emigrating to the United States in 1978 with her husband, ultimately receiving United States citizenship. After arriving in the US, she began attending a non-denominational Evangelical church, eventually converting to the Christian faith.
She no longer practices Islam because she feels that even mosques in the US have a radical, anti-American and an anti-peace message.
About a year after the September 11, 2001 attacks, Darwish began writing columns critical of radical Islam.
Darwish's "Arabs for Israel" website describes itself as an organization of Arabs and Muslims who "respect and support the State of Israel", welcome a "peaceful and diverse Middle East", reject "suicide/homicide terrorism as a form of Jihad", and promote "constructive self-criticism and reform" in the Arab/Muslim world.
Palestinian native Kamal Nawash founder of "Free Muslim Coalition Against Terrorism" praises Darwish's work. For Mr. Nawash, Darwish's voice is an important one no matter who listens to it. "The Muslim community needs the controversy," he said. "For too long there has been a monopoly on who spoke for us."
That "monopoly" has been the terrorists and their apologists in the West.
The time has come for the Mohammedan "Resistance" to stand up and rally behind such moral and ethical luminaries as Mrs. Darwish and Mr. Nawash and raise their voices against the surging tide of Mohammedan barbarism of Islam in today's world before the conflict between civilization and barbarism reaches a critical mass where the resulting conflagration will make all previous wars pale in comparison.
Some exceptional sources for your reference:
1.) "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters, an impeccably researched and documented history detailing the origins of the present Arab/Israeli conflict. (available on Amazon.com)
2.) "Now They Call Me Infidel: Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel, and the War on Terror" by Nonie Darwish. Sentinel HC, 2006. ISBN 1595230319 ( available on Amazon.com )
3.) http://www.memri.org/ : English translations of Arabic publications in the Middle East and around the world.
4.) http://www.memritv.org/ : Videos taken directly from Arabic sources with English translations of their content.
5.) http://www.faithfreedom.org/ : The truth about Islam from those who have turned their backs on its barbarism.
6.) http://www.shoebat.com/ : Walid Shoebat is an American citizen, born to a Palestinian father and an American mother. He describes himself as a former member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation ( P.L.O. ) who took part in terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. He gained notoriety and admiration by becoming an ardent critic of Islam and supporter of Israel.
7.) http://www.freemuslims.org/ : "The Free Muslims Against Terrorism" organization is dedicated to the resistance against Islamofascism.
One further comment on the analogy of Islam and Nazism. After the Second World War ended, the French lionized their "resistance fighters" and, no matter what subject you might be engaged on, they would eventually work references to these "resistance fighters" into the conversation. They knew the names of many, they knew the fates of most and would proudly proclaim their parts in the downfall of the Germans. Unfortunately, the very fact that the French were so intimately acquainted with each and every one of these individuals shows how glaringly few there were among the entire French nation.
In contrast, if you ask the Danish who were their resistance fighters, they can confidently state, "We were ALL resistance fighters".
It is a telling aspect of the Danish experience that, after risking so much to save so many from the Nazi juggernaut, one of the first European victims of Mohammedan terror was a Danish filmaker, shot dead in the street, who had made a film denouncing the oppression of women in Islam.
Islam, like the Nazis, does not suffer unavenged criticism.
When the dust settles, and the Islamic terrorists have been defeated, I would vastly prefer to be remembered, like a Dane, among the unnamed and innumerable "resistance fighters" against Islam simply because it was my moral and ethical obligation as a human being.
That is the most precious legacy I can pass on to my children . . . the love of, and respect for, life, dignity, tolerance and self-respect.
The only significant difference is that the German Nazi political phenomenon was initiated, propagated and relentlessly driven forward by the adamant will of a single individual, Adolph Hitler, while Islam, on the other hand, is a nebulous religious concept unsusceptible to conventional methods of attack against its adherents or defence by its victims.
What does stand out today is that there are strikingly similar steps being taken by individuals and movements both within and without Islam, as there were in Nazi Germany, who can be characterized as "resistance fighters" .
During the period of the Nazi regime, as it developed the blueprints for, and executed the steps to achieve its avowed goal of, world domination, there arose certain individuals who, for personal, moral and ethical reasons, could not condone or collaborate in the furthering of those goals.
Foremost among those who opposed Hitler's ambitions was the Wehrmacht officer Claus von Stauffenberg. Badly wounded in North Africa, Stauffenberg was a political conservative and a zealous German nationalist. He had at first welcomed the Nazi regime but had become rapidly disillusioned. He was at first appalled by the systematic and cold-blooded executions of Jewish civilians and the treatment of the Russian POWs. Then, beginning in 1942 he shared the widespread conviction among Army officers that Germany was being led to disaster and that Hitler must be removed from power. For some time his religious scruples had prevented him from coming to the conclusion that assassination was the way to achieve this.
Following the Battle of Stalingrad in December 1942, however, he came to the conclusion that not assassinating Hitler would be a greater moral evil.
On July 20, 1944, von Stauffenberg, in concert with his fellow collaborators, placed and detonated a bomb in the conference room where Hitler was holding court. By a mere chance of fate, the explosion was deflected by one of the massive oaken legs of the conference table and Hitler escaped serious injury.
While this particular attempt was unsuccessful, and the subsquent Gestapo reprisals took the lives of almost 5000 officers, members of their families and friends, it provided the inspiration and impetus for other Germans to follow and opened the gates for a growing flood of defections at all levels of the Nazi party.
It was a signal moment in the eventual downfall and defeat of the Nazis.
Today, there is a rising tide of revulsion among Mohammedans at the increasing barbarity being exhibited by their co-religionists around the globe. Mohammedans by the tens of thousands are turning to other, more civilized and truly spiritual faiths. Primary among the faiths to which these disillusioned Mohammedans are turning are Evangelical Christianity with its embrace of Israel and the Holy Land as the ancestral home of the Jews and, not surprisingly, with its history of pacifism in the face of aggression, Buddhism.
There are some shining stars of today's resistance to Islam's barbarism, one of which is a exceptional and outspoken ex-Mohammedan woman, Nonie Darwish, whose website can be viewed at http://www.arabsforisrael.com/ .
The daughter of an Egyptian officer who fell victim to the first Israeli targeted assassination, Nonie struggled with the personal, religious and political consequences of that action.
She worked as an editor and translator for the Middle East News Agency, until emigrating to the United States in 1978 with her husband, ultimately receiving United States citizenship. After arriving in the US, she began attending a non-denominational Evangelical church, eventually converting to the Christian faith.
She no longer practices Islam because she feels that even mosques in the US have a radical, anti-American and an anti-peace message.
About a year after the September 11, 2001 attacks, Darwish began writing columns critical of radical Islam.
Darwish's "Arabs for Israel" website describes itself as an organization of Arabs and Muslims who "respect and support the State of Israel", welcome a "peaceful and diverse Middle East", reject "suicide/homicide terrorism as a form of Jihad", and promote "constructive self-criticism and reform" in the Arab/Muslim world.
Palestinian native Kamal Nawash founder of "Free Muslim Coalition Against Terrorism" praises Darwish's work. For Mr. Nawash, Darwish's voice is an important one no matter who listens to it. "The Muslim community needs the controversy," he said. "For too long there has been a monopoly on who spoke for us."
That "monopoly" has been the terrorists and their apologists in the West.
The time has come for the Mohammedan "Resistance" to stand up and rally behind such moral and ethical luminaries as Mrs. Darwish and Mr. Nawash and raise their voices against the surging tide of Mohammedan barbarism of Islam in today's world before the conflict between civilization and barbarism reaches a critical mass where the resulting conflagration will make all previous wars pale in comparison.
Some exceptional sources for your reference:
1.) "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters, an impeccably researched and documented history detailing the origins of the present Arab/Israeli conflict. (available on Amazon.com)
2.) "Now They Call Me Infidel: Why I Renounced Jihad for America, Israel, and the War on Terror" by Nonie Darwish. Sentinel HC, 2006. ISBN 1595230319 ( available on Amazon.com )
3.) http://www.memri.org/ : English translations of Arabic publications in the Middle East and around the world.
4.) http://www.memritv.org/ : Videos taken directly from Arabic sources with English translations of their content.
5.) http://www.faithfreedom.org/ : The truth about Islam from those who have turned their backs on its barbarism.
6.) http://www.shoebat.com/ : Walid Shoebat is an American citizen, born to a Palestinian father and an American mother. He describes himself as a former member of the Palestine Liberation Organisation ( P.L.O. ) who took part in terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. He gained notoriety and admiration by becoming an ardent critic of Islam and supporter of Israel.
7.) http://www.freemuslims.org/ : "The Free Muslims Against Terrorism" organization is dedicated to the resistance against Islamofascism.
One further comment on the analogy of Islam and Nazism. After the Second World War ended, the French lionized their "resistance fighters" and, no matter what subject you might be engaged on, they would eventually work references to these "resistance fighters" into the conversation. They knew the names of many, they knew the fates of most and would proudly proclaim their parts in the downfall of the Germans. Unfortunately, the very fact that the French were so intimately acquainted with each and every one of these individuals shows how glaringly few there were among the entire French nation.
In contrast, if you ask the Danish who were their resistance fighters, they can confidently state, "We were ALL resistance fighters".
It is a telling aspect of the Danish experience that, after risking so much to save so many from the Nazi juggernaut, one of the first European victims of Mohammedan terror was a Danish filmaker, shot dead in the street, who had made a film denouncing the oppression of women in Islam.
Islam, like the Nazis, does not suffer unavenged criticism.
When the dust settles, and the Islamic terrorists have been defeated, I would vastly prefer to be remembered, like a Dane, among the unnamed and innumerable "resistance fighters" against Islam simply because it was my moral and ethical obligation as a human being.
That is the most precious legacy I can pass on to my children . . . the love of, and respect for, life, dignity, tolerance and self-respect.
Friday, August 10, 2007
The Tragedy of Islam . . . the Fall from Grace.
In the face of daily, even hourly, reports of the continuing assault by Islam against civilized societies around the world, as well as the savage internecine conflicts being waged among Mohammedan communities themselves, one of the saddest aspects of this war is the Islamic apologists' attempts to justify the religion by pointing to the "Golden Age" of Islam in Spain during the time of the Cordovan Caliphate.
The Cordovan Caliphate ruled the Iberian Peninsula from approximately 750 - 1030 C.E. and did, indeed, with the usual fluctuations in political attitudes and practices, produce a relatively well-integrated and flourishing multi-cultural and multi-religious society that stood as a symbol of benevolent rule for nearly three centuries.
While there were the occasional persecutions and expulsions of Jews and Christians, on the whole, it can safely be described as the pinnacle of Islamic achievement in the realms of enlightened culture and government.
Unfortunately, this era of Islamic achievement ended almost one thousand years ago.
Since then, there has been no similar display of Islam as an intellectual, cultural, scientific or religious luminary among the nations of the world.
Living in the past is an illusory foundation for present actions. The atrocities and barbarities of Islam today cannot be blurred or justified by pointing to a long-gone era that has left only the whispering ghosts of its greatness behind.
As Mark Twain once remarked, when being shown the landmarks of a certain city, "They tell me it was a good hotel once, but that signifies nothing. I was a good boy once."
The saddest aspect of the Mohammedan's referring to the "Golden Age" of Islam during the Cordovan Caliphate as an example of Islam's potential is that, in doing so, he himself shows up the glaring contrast between the heights to which Islam might have aspired, and achieved, in the modern world and the actual barbarity and atavism displayed by Mohammedans across the globe today.
Given the gift of oil, the cornerstone of all modern societies, the Mohammedans have freely chosen to squander that priceless gift on the spreading of terror, violence, destruction and oppression rather than building schools, universities, hospitals, research institutes, etc. all of which, with the unlimited petro-dollar funds available for meeting any and all of their needs, could have brought the finest scientists, scholars, artists, writers, philosophers and educators to the Islamic world and Islam would have become the brightest beacon of civilization since the time of the Pharaohs.
Rather, Mohammedans have freely and, it seems, almost enthusiastically, chosen to become the most barbaric and intolerant of all cultures in the world today.
Their image and reputation in the world today is not the fault of the Israelis, the Jews, the Christians, the Americans, the "West", or any other outside source.
The reason for their "fall from Grace" lies within their own hearts . . . .
The Cordovan Caliphate ruled the Iberian Peninsula from approximately 750 - 1030 C.E. and did, indeed, with the usual fluctuations in political attitudes and practices, produce a relatively well-integrated and flourishing multi-cultural and multi-religious society that stood as a symbol of benevolent rule for nearly three centuries.
While there were the occasional persecutions and expulsions of Jews and Christians, on the whole, it can safely be described as the pinnacle of Islamic achievement in the realms of enlightened culture and government.
Unfortunately, this era of Islamic achievement ended almost one thousand years ago.
Since then, there has been no similar display of Islam as an intellectual, cultural, scientific or religious luminary among the nations of the world.
Living in the past is an illusory foundation for present actions. The atrocities and barbarities of Islam today cannot be blurred or justified by pointing to a long-gone era that has left only the whispering ghosts of its greatness behind.
As Mark Twain once remarked, when being shown the landmarks of a certain city, "They tell me it was a good hotel once, but that signifies nothing. I was a good boy once."
The saddest aspect of the Mohammedan's referring to the "Golden Age" of Islam during the Cordovan Caliphate as an example of Islam's potential is that, in doing so, he himself shows up the glaring contrast between the heights to which Islam might have aspired, and achieved, in the modern world and the actual barbarity and atavism displayed by Mohammedans across the globe today.
Given the gift of oil, the cornerstone of all modern societies, the Mohammedans have freely chosen to squander that priceless gift on the spreading of terror, violence, destruction and oppression rather than building schools, universities, hospitals, research institutes, etc. all of which, with the unlimited petro-dollar funds available for meeting any and all of their needs, could have brought the finest scientists, scholars, artists, writers, philosophers and educators to the Islamic world and Islam would have become the brightest beacon of civilization since the time of the Pharaohs.
Rather, Mohammedans have freely and, it seems, almost enthusiastically, chosen to become the most barbaric and intolerant of all cultures in the world today.
Their image and reputation in the world today is not the fault of the Israelis, the Jews, the Christians, the Americans, the "West", or any other outside source.
The reason for their "fall from Grace" lies within their own hearts . . . .
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
"From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters
With the unprecedented plethora of books, articles, documentaries, magazines, news reports, blogs, websites, multimedia telecommunications coverage, etc. dealing with the Middle East conflict, one single book stands out like a shining lodestar of rationality and objectivity in the swirling maelstrom of controversy surrounding Israel's existence.
That book is "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters.
Ms. Peters began her investigation into the Arab-Israeli conflict as an avowed pro-Arabist, her only previous information on the situation coming from the superficial mass media reports, each of which had their own special interest influencing the perspective of that coverage. The vast majority, of course, being antithetical to Israel for political, economic and religious reasons at the time.
During the course of her research, Ms. Peters dug deeper in various Arab, Israeli, British and American government archives than any previous historian, personally interviewed many of the principals intimately involved in the shifting quicksands of Middle East politics, and did one of the most detailed and impeccably verified tasks of supporting each point presented in her book.
Ms. Peters needed to use no emotive or provocative terms to convey the importance and historical uniqueness of Israel's re-birth. Hers is, without a doubt, one of the most dispassionate and objective historical works ever written.
For Ms. Peters, the facts speak for themselves.
One telling anecdote regarding the reaction of the pro-Arabists and the Mohammedans to Ms. Peter's book was that a concerted campaign was launched shortly after the publication of this book to remove, by any means, all copies of her book from library shelves across the U.S, Canada and Britain.
You might check and see if there's one available in your local library . . .
If not, the book is easily available through Amazon.com
Propaganda crumbles in the face of the facts . . .
That book is "From Time Immemorial" by Joan Peters.
Ms. Peters began her investigation into the Arab-Israeli conflict as an avowed pro-Arabist, her only previous information on the situation coming from the superficial mass media reports, each of which had their own special interest influencing the perspective of that coverage. The vast majority, of course, being antithetical to Israel for political, economic and religious reasons at the time.
During the course of her research, Ms. Peters dug deeper in various Arab, Israeli, British and American government archives than any previous historian, personally interviewed many of the principals intimately involved in the shifting quicksands of Middle East politics, and did one of the most detailed and impeccably verified tasks of supporting each point presented in her book.
Ms. Peters needed to use no emotive or provocative terms to convey the importance and historical uniqueness of Israel's re-birth. Hers is, without a doubt, one of the most dispassionate and objective historical works ever written.
For Ms. Peters, the facts speak for themselves.
One telling anecdote regarding the reaction of the pro-Arabists and the Mohammedans to Ms. Peter's book was that a concerted campaign was launched shortly after the publication of this book to remove, by any means, all copies of her book from library shelves across the U.S, Canada and Britain.
You might check and see if there's one available in your local library . . .
If not, the book is easily available through Amazon.com
Propaganda crumbles in the face of the facts . . .
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Monday, August 6, 2007
Tolerance and Respect?
The Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem
As Opposed to:
 | The Bamiyan Statues of the Buddha had stood in Afghanistan for over 1500 years. These priceless works of religious art were one of the most beautiful and venerated examples of Buddhist spiritual creativity and an unparalleled physical and architectural achievement by any standard. |  |
Nowhere else in the world was there an example of religious statuary on such a magnificent and breathtaking scale.
But, under the tolerance and mercy of the Mohammedans, they were turned into rubble.
An early and, unfortunately unheeded, wake-up call to the entire world as to the eventual fate of ALL non-Islamic holy sites if the dark shadow of Islam should envelop, unopposed, the rest of the civilized world. It is an especially revealing facet of this tragedy, rather this atrocity, that not one Islamic country, organization or individual among the oil-soaked Mohammedan world offered to aid in the restoration or recarving of these priceless religious artifacts.
In stark opposition to the naked hatred and intolerance shown to the Bamiyan Buddhas, stands the unprecedented care and respect the Jews of Israel have shown to the third holiest site in the Mohammedan world . . . the Al Aqsa Mosque . . . which stands on the site of both the First Temple, built by Solomon and the Second temple built by King Herod. The holiest sites in Jewish history and where the spirit of the G-d of Israel resided.
Even though those who now worship in this mosque are fanatically dedicated to the destruction if Israel, the Jews cannot, and will not, desecrate this house of the god of their enemies.
Israel, the World's "David" Against Mohammedanism's "Goliath"?
In the face of a growing and increasingly violent world-wide onslaught of Mohammedan terror and internecine Islamic atrocities, is Israel to be forced to become the "Little David" to slay this Philistine "Goliath"?
Never forget, the capital city of the Philistines was Gaza!
In 1981, Israel successfully destroyed the Osiraq nuclear facility in Iraq. Had Israel not done so, the Allied troops who fought in the First Gulf war would have faced Saddam's tactical nuclear weapons and the outcome would have been vastly different and unquestionably far more costly in Allied troop and equipment losses. The overthrow of the Saddam regime would certainly not have been as easy or assured.
Now that Iran has achieved nuclear technology that will, despite their transparently disingenuous protestations, lead directly to the development of nuclear weaponry, must it fall once again on Israel to save the world from the imminent threat of Mohammedan attempts at world domination through nuclear destruction on a scale that will make Hiroshima and Nagasaki pale in comparison?
Iran's psychotic leader Ahmedinijad has openly threatened to "wipe Israel off the face of the earth."
Does any sane individual in the West truly believe that, once that objective has been accomplished WITH LITTLE OR NO WESTERN OPPOSITION, he and his megalomaniacal allies will stop there?
This is, remember, a RELIGIOUS war, and no religious warriors have EVER stopped their campaign to spread their "faith" until they were soundly and definitively defeated.
In our opinion, it would be far wiser, both politically and economically, for the Western world to form a grand alliance NOW and, in concert, lance the festering pustule of Mohammedan aspirations to world domination before the price in human life and the threat to the survival of Western civilization becomes too great.
Israel cannot be the eternal shield, alone, against this Goliath . . . and if, God forbid, she is indeed destroyed, then the West will as surely suffer her fate as night follows day.
Never forget, the capital city of the Philistines was Gaza!
In 1981, Israel successfully destroyed the Osiraq nuclear facility in Iraq. Had Israel not done so, the Allied troops who fought in the First Gulf war would have faced Saddam's tactical nuclear weapons and the outcome would have been vastly different and unquestionably far more costly in Allied troop and equipment losses. The overthrow of the Saddam regime would certainly not have been as easy or assured.
Now that Iran has achieved nuclear technology that will, despite their transparently disingenuous protestations, lead directly to the development of nuclear weaponry, must it fall once again on Israel to save the world from the imminent threat of Mohammedan attempts at world domination through nuclear destruction on a scale that will make Hiroshima and Nagasaki pale in comparison?
Iran's psychotic leader Ahmedinijad has openly threatened to "wipe Israel off the face of the earth."
Does any sane individual in the West truly believe that, once that objective has been accomplished WITH LITTLE OR NO WESTERN OPPOSITION, he and his megalomaniacal allies will stop there?
This is, remember, a RELIGIOUS war, and no religious warriors have EVER stopped their campaign to spread their "faith" until they were soundly and definitively defeated.
In our opinion, it would be far wiser, both politically and economically, for the Western world to form a grand alliance NOW and, in concert, lance the festering pustule of Mohammedan aspirations to world domination before the price in human life and the threat to the survival of Western civilization becomes too great.
Israel cannot be the eternal shield, alone, against this Goliath . . . and if, God forbid, she is indeed destroyed, then the West will as surely suffer her fate as night follows day.
Danish Cartoons
Below are the cartoons published in Denmark's Jyllands-Posten. Click each image to enlarge.
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
Taken from http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=12146&offer=&hidebodyad=true
The cartoons above have been used by Mohammedans as a reason for murdering hundreds of innocent men, women and children around the world. They claim that any characterization of Mohammed is "an insult to Islam". The fact that Mohammedans routinely publish cartoons far more vicious and hateful concerning Jews, Christians and other faiths is, apparently acceptable to these murderous thugs.
If you visit http://www.memri.org/, the Middle East Media Research Institute, you will find in both printed and video form, a spewing of hatred for non-Mohammedans that hasn't been seen in the civilized world since the edicts of both the Catholic Church and Martin Luther's ravings in the Middle Ages. Even the Nazis, the apogee of anti-Semitism in our recent history, didn't extend themselves in such an unprecedented and unfettered way.
If Islam, and the 1.2 billion followers of this so-called "religion" are ready, at a moment's notice, to slaughter fellow human beings on the basis of a simple drawing, then there is no more to be said for their barbaric theology.
What has apparently so far escaped the notice of ALL commentators on this controversy is the fact that while Islam does, indeed, forbid the characterization of "Allah" and Mohammed, this stricture applies SOLELY to those who worship Mohammed. Any Mohammedan who portrays either "Allah" or Mohammed can be fairly said to have invited the wrath of his co-religionists and brought down the results of his folly on his own head.
But NO non-Mohammedan is either under the restraint of this stricture or SUBJECT TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF VIOLATING IT ! ! !
If we accept the rational of the Mohammedans, then the West, and particularly each and every Jew and Christian would have a perfect, and fully justified right, to slaughter any Mohammedan they found on the grounds that Islam routinely insults, slanders, demonizes and in every other way offends their religions on a daily, if not hourly basis.
Somewhere, sometime, the line has to be drawn in the sand to say, 'Enough is enough!". . . and, in our opinion, that time is now, and that place is here !
Here is a video related to the above cartoons:
Friday, August 3, 2007
What Does the Koran Say?
Israel has survived the oppression and persecution of the Greeks, the Romans, the Catholic Church's cancerous theology, the Ottoman Empire, the Nazis, the English and will definitley outlast and overcome the barbarity of Islam.
The first law of any conflict is: "Know your enemy". In "Mein Kampf" Hitler laid out, in minute detail what he intended to do when he came into power. Over 30 million people, 6 million of whom were Jews, died because they didn't take his blueprint for world domination seriously.
It is an absolute necessity for every person who values freedom and tolerance to READ THE KORAN!
This is the Mohammedans' blueprint for exactly the same path to world domination as the Nazis. Each day brings us new and ever increasing reports of Islamic terrorism and oppression and their VERY serious threats to Western culture and values.
If you think Islam isn't serious, there are 1.2 billion Mohammedans who believe:
Sura 8:12 - I am with you; so support those who believed. I will strike terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved. You may strike them above the necks, and you may strike even every finger.
It even promotes terrorism in the Koran.
Sura 2:216 - Fighting is prescribed for you, and you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and that you love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.
Sura 3:151 - Soon shall we cast TERROR into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority.
Sura 3:151 speaks directly of killing ALL non-Mohammedans.
Sura 9:5 - Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the non-believers wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.
Surah 2: 98 – Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers.
Surah 2: 191-193 – KILL them [unbelievers] wherever you find them….Fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be ONLY FOR ALLAH.
Surah 3: 19 – Surely the true religion with Allah is Islam…and whoever disbelieves in the communications of Allah then surely Allah is quick in reckoning.
Surah 4: 104 – Be not weak in pursuit of the enemy.
Surah 5: 51 – “O you who believe! DO NOT TAKE THE JEWS AND THE CHRISTIANS FOR FRIENDS; they are friends of each other; and whosoever among you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.
Surah 8: 15-17 – “O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve marching for war, turn not your backs to them. Whoever shall turn his back to them on that day – unless he turn aside for the sake of fighting or withdraws to a company – then he, indeed, becomes deserving of Allah’s wrath, and his abode is hell… So you did not slay them, but it was Allah who slew them…that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is Hearing, Knowing.
Surah 9: 29 – Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth… until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a STATE OF SUBJECTION.
Surah 9:33 – “[Allah] it is who sent His Apostle with guidance and the religion of truth, that He might cause it to PREVAIL OVER ALL RELIGIONS, though polytheists may be averse.
===================================================================
Mohammedans should keep very, very quiet when talking about "peace" and being "peacemakers" . . .
Islam is, today, the most violent and barbaric religion on the planet and the fact that there has been no "Million Mohammedan March" to condemn terrorism speaks volumes in terms of the average Mohammedan's view of terror.
There is NO tolerance in Islam . . . when Mohammedans are in power.
Never forget . . . . . "KNOW YOUR ENEMY!"
READ THE KORAN ! ! ! . . . forewarned is forearmed !
Thursday, August 2, 2007
Just another reminder of the "Monster Unchained !"
This is the naked face of Islam . . . a religion born in the vast and arid deserts of the Middle East by a nomadic tribal chief whose entire world view was one of violence, oppression, deception and hate. In the video above you are witnessing the unashamed and incandescent hatred that the followers of this "religion" have for anyone who stands in their way of world domination.
Unlike the cancer of anti-Semitism which is based on the millenium-old lies, blood libels and propoganda of the Catholic Church, the ground swell of anti-Islamic sentiment sweeping the world today is based solidly on the reactions of moral and G-d fearing individuals around the planet to the terrorist atrocities we witness with our own eyes each and every day.
To even consider the idea of Islam as a "religion of peace" is obscene beyond belief and an insult to the memories of the victims, both past, present AND FUTURE, of this scourge of the world community.
G-d gave dominion over the wealth of the earth to the Christians, most notably the Catholic Church, for almost two thousand years and they squandered it on internecine wars and colonial adventures. Now that Church and its Protestant offspring are in tatters.
G-d has now given the Mohammedans the keys to the riches of this world in the form of oil, the cornerstone of progress for all modern societies. They have, over the past one hundred years used that unimaginable wealth to foster hatred, terror and oppression across every land they have conquered and are now turning their attention, and spreading their evil, to the West.
Watch this video and you will see what is in store for you . . . .
Israel . . . an Apartheid State?
Oddly enough, the one place in the world where Jews, Christians and Mohammedans live in relative harmony is Israel.
Israeli Arabs (Mohammedans OR Christians) aren't fleeing Israel to get into the Palestinian territories, Israeli Christians are flourishing as never before and Christians from abroad are making pilgrimages in record numbers.
It's interesting that no Israeli Arab Mohammedans are committing terrorist acts like Mohammedans are in the States, Britain, Australia, Iraq (against even their own co-religionists), Europe, Asia, India, etc.
They are free to practice their religion without the restrictions that are being laid on Mohammedans in the U.S, Britain, etc. today. Mohammedan women can't drive or leave the house alone in Saudi Arabia, but they can in Israel. There are fewer "honor killings" in Israel among the Mohammedan community than in any other community of similar size.
If you're looking for internal "tolerance" and "peaceful co-existence", Israel's a pretty good example to follow. . . . That's one of the reasons why Israel's neighbours are so virulently opposed to her existence . . . it shows up their own intolerance so glaringly.
Simply look at the chaos and bloodshed in Gaza today . . . a Gaza without an Israeli presence. It's purely an internecine conflict between the Mohammedans themselves.
If you want to put things in perspective, if you want to condemn apartheid, just ask yourself how many Mohammedans live in Israel and how many Jews live in Mohammedan countries . . . like Saudi Arabia?
Israeli Arabs (Mohammedans OR Christians) aren't fleeing Israel to get into the Palestinian territories, Israeli Christians are flourishing as never before and Christians from abroad are making pilgrimages in record numbers.
It's interesting that no Israeli Arab Mohammedans are committing terrorist acts like Mohammedans are in the States, Britain, Australia, Iraq (against even their own co-religionists), Europe, Asia, India, etc.
They are free to practice their religion without the restrictions that are being laid on Mohammedans in the U.S, Britain, etc. today. Mohammedan women can't drive or leave the house alone in Saudi Arabia, but they can in Israel. There are fewer "honor killings" in Israel among the Mohammedan community than in any other community of similar size.
If you're looking for internal "tolerance" and "peaceful co-existence", Israel's a pretty good example to follow. . . . That's one of the reasons why Israel's neighbours are so virulently opposed to her existence . . . it shows up their own intolerance so glaringly.
Simply look at the chaos and bloodshed in Gaza today . . . a Gaza without an Israeli presence. It's purely an internecine conflict between the Mohammedans themselves.
If you want to put things in perspective, if you want to condemn apartheid, just ask yourself how many Mohammedans live in Israel and how many Jews live in Mohammedan countries . . . like Saudi Arabia?
Does Israel have reserved roads where only Jews are allowed to travel?
The only roads where "restrictions" apply are those bordering Arab Mohammedan villages from which both RPG (rocket propelled grenades) and small arms fire have consistently been directed at Israeli civilian traffic. That civilian traffic includes Arab Israeli and Palestinian workers trying to reach their jobs in Israel as well as Israeli civilians.Barriers have been erected between specific villages and the roads to eliminate these attacks.The government has setup check-posts to allow only those Palestinians and Israelis with legitimate permits to use these routes in order to reduce the incident of terrorist fatalities.
Why is there this bizarre myth that before Israel, Muslims preached 'tolerance' to Jews?
Straight frrom the horse's mouth (so to speak . . .) as the Koran clearly and unequivocally states:Surah V: 51 – “O you who believe! DO NOT TAKE THE JEWS AND THE CHRISTIANS FOR FRIENDS; they are friends of each other; and whosoever among you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people.” Islam . . . the religion that loves to hate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
