Truth or Consequences . . . .?

Since we've been expanding the breadth and depth of our articles on Islam and its on-going threat to modern civilization, we've been getting excellent responses to our position . . . from both sides of the fence.

What we've found interesting is that the responses have taken on a pattern that's impossible to explain other than as a clear-cut conflict between good and evil.

Those who support our views, including both practicing and ex-Mohammedans, have condemned the examples of Islamic oppression and terror we have detailed and, along with the non-Mohammedans who read our blog, have concurred that Islam is today, indeed, an "unchained monster". This "monster", if left unopposed. will spread a far more deadly cancer of violence and barbarity than the Nazis of the Second World War could have ever imagined in their wildest dreams.

Those who oppose our views have uniformly ignored or, at best, minimized the continuing outrages of Islamic terror worldwide and have either riposted with hysterical rants about how Israel, the Jews, the U.S. the "Zionists', the West, the Christians, etc. are all responsible for the actions of the terrorists. More often, they have just stooped to slinging labels like "racist", "zionist", "hate-monger" and the like, rather than addressing the issues we've presented.

Islam is a religion that refuses to accept responsibility for its own actions.

While the world watches the daily beheadings, the bombings, the beatings, the rapes, the lynchings and other examples of Islamic "tolerance", the Mohammedans themselves seem to pride themselves on having a pathological condition of "blind-eye" to the most basic moral and ethical standards. They go on, endlessly, about how Islam is a "religion of peace and tolerance" while at the same justifying and applauding the atrocities commited by their co-religionists in the U.S., Britain, Canada, Israel, Turkey, Europe, South America, Indonesia, Egypt, Jordan and on and on.

The internecine slaughter between the Mohammedan communities in Gaza, Iraq, Lebanon, Indonesia, etc. today can't be blamed on the "Zionists", the "infidels", the "Great Satan" or any other outside influence.

These are Mohammedans slaughtering Mohammedans . . . period.

Just how blind or stupid they believe the rest of the world to be is anyone's guess, but the rising groundswell of global popular revulsion to Islam is due solely to the actions of the Mohammedans themselves.

That is not "racism", it's not "bigotry", it's not "Islamophobia" . . . it's simply a healthy universal moral revulsion toward the barbarism of Islam and its followers..

NO ONE ever "forced" a Mohammedan to become a terrorist. NO ONE ever "forced" a Mohammedan to slaughter the innocents in the name of Jihad. These are acts of their own choosing, their own free will and their own primitive culture.

Other people, other nations, other cultures have suffered far worse than the Mohammedans and overcome their oppressors without resorting to the atrocities that Mohammedans feel to be their unique right to commit.

The Jews suffered untold horrors at the hands of both Christians and Mohammedans for two thousand years . . . without raising a hand against their oppressors. Since the re-birth of the Nation of Israel, at the behest of a world shamed by the Nazis, they have defended themselves against the combined armies of the Islamic world and continue to be the ONLY nation on the face of the globe that actively and effectively combats Islamic terror.

As for opposing opinions, we welcome any rational, reasoned debate on our position, but when the epithet "racist" is used against us for our opinions expressed in this forum, we immediately know we've won the argument. As soon as the epithets begin to fly, the facts are being ignored.

And we base this forum on FACTS . . . not blind prejudice

There is no such thing as "the Islamic race". Islam is a religion embracing all races.

What we are standing up against is the spread of a violent religious movement that has ravaged the world for the past one hundred years. The violence is getting worse, the extremes to which Mohammedans will go are rapidly expanding and there is no doubt whatsoever that if Islam is left unopposed, the Western world will see itself destroyed from within by its own tolerance of the barbarians who have no tolerance for others.

In 1924, Adolph Hitler published his magnum opus, "Mein Kampf" and in it he detailed graphically exactly what he intended to do should he ever come into power. The world didn't take him seriously until it was far too late for the 40+million who died victims of, or in opposing, the Nazis.

The Quran was written 1400 years ago and it details as well exactly what the Mohammedans have in store for all non-Mohammedans should Islam gain ascendancy in this world. The daily evidence of this is there for all to see, even in a "politically correct" media that has bent over backwards to accommodate Mohammedan "sensitivities".

We have been criticized for using the term "Mohammedan" when referring to the followers of Islam, but we use that term purposely. In our book, if a Mohammedan is willing, even eager, to take the life of someone NOT OF HIS FAITH for drawing a cartoon of Mohammed, then Mohammed is no longer a man, but becomes a "God" to whom and through whom all prayers are directed and flow.

As one who worships Christ is called a "Christian", one who worships Buddha is a "Buddhist", so one who worships Mohammed is, logically, a "Mohammedan". There is no disapprobation attached to the term. It is simply a fact.

Jesus stands in the same relation to G-d that Mohammed holds with "Allah", but to my knowledge, NO ONE, Jew, Christian, Mohammedan or anyone else, has been slaughtered for portraying Jesus or any other Biblical figure either reverently or vulgarly.

That particular religious abberation is the unique province of the Mohammedans.

If you thought the death camps of the Nazis were an affront to humanity, wait till you see what Islam provides for the "infidels" around the world . . . if Islam is allowed to obtain supremecy.

But then, if you do see it . . . . it will be far too late for you.

There were those who resisted the Nazis and, in doing so, saved thousands of lives and shortened the war . . . thereby saving countless thousands of others.

But there were also those, like Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984), who wrote the poem "First They Came . . ." reminding us that silence makes one an accomplice of the terrorists


Original:

Als die Nazis die Kommunisten holten,habe ich geschwiegen;ich war ja kein Kommunist.
Als sie die Sozialdemokraten einsperrten,habe ich geschwiegen;ich war ja kein Sozialdemokrat.
Als sie die Gewerkschafter holten,habe ich nicht protestiert;ich war ja kein Gewerkschafter.
Als sie mich holten,gab es keinen mehr, der protestieren konnte.

Translation:

When the Nazis came for the communists,I remained silent;I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,I remained silent;I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,I did not speak out;I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for me,there was no one left to speak out.

It wouldn't take much editing to change "Nazis" to "Mohammedans" and that poem would be expressly applicable today.


"When the Mohammedans came . . ."

When the Mohammedans killed the Jews, I remained silent; I was not a Jew.
When they killed the Buddhists, I remained silent; I was not a Buddhist.
When they killed the Hindus, I did not speak out; I was not a Hindu.
When they came for me, there was no one left to speak out.



So, are you going to submit . . . or resist?

The choice is yours . . . .