Western Civilization at the Crossroad . . . !

There have been many times when the fate of Western civilization has reached a critical crossroad and, whether through chance, choice or compulsion, has taken a direction which has had irreversible and incalculable effects on the future development of mankind.

When, in 490 B.C.E., the Persian monarch Darius I made his first concerted attempt at a land invasion to conquer the Greek city-states, his force of approximately 50,000+ Persian troops were met by a smaller force of 8,000+ Greek and allied troops under the command of Militiades, Callimachus and Arimestus on the plain of Marathon. Against all odds, the Greeks won a decisive victory and ensured the continued existence and development of Greek culture that would shape the future of Western Civilization.

Ten years later, in 480 B.C.E., the Athenian commander Themistocles won, against all odds and a Persian force more than twice the size of his own, a naval victory in the Straits of Salamis that led to the defeat of the Persian navy and the eventual crumbling of the Persian Empire.

That fate was sealed at the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 B.C.E. when Alexander the Great, with his 40,000 troops, faced the overwhelming might of Darius III and his estimated 200,000 Persian and allied forces. Alexander's brillant and tactically stunning generalship swept the field leaving over 50,000 Persian casualties while sustaining losses of less than 4,000 of his own troops.

During the Middle Ages, battles were fought by Crusaders and Mohammedans that determined the fate, not only of the Holy Land, but of European civilization itself. In 1187 the forces of Saladin overwhelmed and defeated the knights of Guy de Lusignon at the Battle of Hattin near Tiberius, opening the way for the Mohammedans' further conquests that eventually led to the expulsion of the Crusaders from the Middle East as both a political and religious influence and placed Israel under the iron heel of Islamic oppression for almost 750 years.

The most recent historical threat to civilized societies was the rise of the National Socialist Party in Germany prior to and during the Second World War. When Adolph Hitler wrote "Mein Kampf" while in Landsberg prison in 1924, he outlined in the most meticulous detail each and every policy he intended to follow should he ever gain political power in Germany.

For those of you who have never read this magnum opus of Hitler's, it contains, in stark black and white, the blueprint for his extermination of the Jews and all other "untermenchen", or sub-humans, such as the Slavs, Gypsies, Russians, etc. as well as an unabashed determination to acquire "lebensraum", or "living space", for the German nation which would be taken from the Russians.

In my personal opinion, "Mein Kampf" and "The Koran" should be required reading in every school and college Political Science class, to be read and analysed as the supreme examples of the roots of fascist and totalitarian political/religious philosophies throughout the civilized world.
Forewarned is forearmed . . . ! !

These goals and the methods by which Hitler intended to achieve them were there for all the world to see nine years before his Nazi Party gained seats in the German Reichstag and twelve years before he became Chancellor of the German nation.

And yet the world did nothing . . . . .

Ah, I apologize . . . the world did do something . . . it appeased Hitler.

The Western Powers waffled and wavered. They hemmed and hawed. They sacrificed the Danzig Corridor, they abandoned the Sudetenland, they watched in self-imposed impotency as Austria fell to the Wehrmacht and the Gestapo began its reign of terror.

Neville Chamberlain, to Britain's everlasting shame, licked Hitler's boots and brought home a piece of paper "guaranteeing peace in our times". That piece of paper cost Europe and Russia over 70 million dead and uncounted maimed, wounded and disabled. Over half of those were Russians.

Now, at this critical crossroads in the history of the world, we are faced with a greater threat than that of the Nazi juggernaut that cut such a brutal swathe through the nations of Eurpope and Africa.

That threat is Islam.

In the Koran, as in "Mein Kampf", the aims and methods of Islam to dominate the world and to lay waste Western Civilization are laid out in meticulous detail. There is no need to invent a plagarized "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" to incriminate the Mohammedan in his clearly stated intent. There is no need to invent a spurious "international conspiracy" as the anti-Semites have lodged against the Jews.

The Koran itself lays out in precise and exhaustive detail, as Hitler did in "Mein Kampf" for the Nazis, the ambition and intent of Islam to conquer, enslave or exterminate the "infidel" wherever he may be found.

Here, below, are Koranic verses, the "holy scriptures" of Islam itself, nothing added, nothing omitted.

This is Islam's detailed blueprint for your fate should they ever gain the upper hand. . . as we see so blatantly illustrated on a daily basis in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Malaysia, Syria, etc. :

=====================================================================

Bukhari:V4B52N260 -"The Prophet said, ‘If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him!’"

Sura ( 5:51) - "Believers, take not Jews and Christians for your friends."

Sura (8:12) - "I am with you; so support those who believed. I will strike terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved. You may strike them above the necks, and you may strike even every finger."

Sura (2:216) - Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.

Sura (3:151) - Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority.

Sura (9:5) Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the non-believers wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush.

Sura (2: 98) – "Allah is the enemy of the unbelievers."

Sura (2: 191-193) – "Kill them [unbelievers] wherever you find them….Fight with them until there is no persecution, and religion should be only for Allah."

Sura (2: 216) – "Fighting is enjoined on you, and it is an object of dislike to you; and it may be that you dislike a thing while it is good for you, and it may be that you love a thing while it is evil for you, and Allah knows, while you do not know."

Sura (3: 19) – "Surely the true religion with Allah is Islam…and whoever disbelieves in the communications of Allah then surely Allah is quick in reckoning."

Sura (4: 104) – "Be not weak in pursuit of the enemy."

Sura (5: 51) – "O you who believe! Do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whosoever among you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people."

Sura (8: 12) – "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."

Sura (8: 15-17 ) – "O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve marching for war, turn not your backs to them. Whoever shall turn his back to them on that day – unless he turn aside for the sake of fighting or withdraws to a company – then he, indeed, becomes deserving of Allah’s wrath, and his abode is hell… So you did not slay them, but it was Allah who slew them…that He might confer upon the believers a good gift from Himself; surely Allah is Hearing, Knowing."

Sura (9: 29) – "Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth… until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection."

(N.B.: The "tax" referred to here is the "Dhimmi" tax which requires each non-Mohammedan to pay an exorbitant tax for the "privilege" of living relatively unmolested under Islam rule.)

Sura (9 :33 ) – "[Allah] it is who sent His Apostle with guidance and the religion of truth, that He might cause it to prevail over all religions, though polytheists may be averse."

Sura ( 8:60 ) - "Infidels (non-Muslims) should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them."

Bukhari [4:52:177]: Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him !"

Bukhari, V1B4N234: "The prophet advised them to drink the urine of the camels. Later on when they killed the prophet's shepherd, the prophet seized them, gouged out their eyes, cut their hands and legs, and left them thirsty in the desert to die."

Source(s):

Some other sources, many from EX-MOHAMMEDANS THEMSELVES can be found at:
http://camera.org/
http://www.islamwatch.org/ExMuslims/Hon...
http://www.americancongressfortruth.com/
http://www.jpost.com/
http://www.honestreporting.com/
http://www.arabsforisrael.com/
http://www.memri.org/
http://www.memritv.org/
http://www.answering-islam.org/
http://news.spirithit.com/index/asia/mor...
http://www.faithfreedom.org/gallery/26.h...
http://smoothstone.blogspot.com/2004/08/...
http://middleeastfacts.com/yashiko
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

====================================================================

Who among our readers are prepared to resist this new Nazism ?

Are you going to go down on your knees in the face of Islamic terrorism and hope that by appeasing this ravenous monster with "small sacrifices" ( . . . like Israeli Jews ) as the Allied nations did to Hitler in sacrificing the Danzig Corridor, the Sudetenland and Austria . . . hoping his hunger would be appeased by these dainty morsels?

Your only choices now, as in 1939, are resistance . . . . or enslavement and death !

And, as we've witnessed time after time in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Yemen, Palestine, Oman, Iran, Iraq, etc., if you're a woman, of the latter, death, would be by far the more preferable of the two . . .